Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 611–626 | Cite as

Homosexual foot fetishism

  • Martin S. Weinberg
  • Colin J. Williams
  • Cassandra Calhan
Article

Abstract

262 respondents from an organization for homosexual foot fetishists provide information from a broader sample than clinical cases and allow examination of the effects of sexual preference on fetishism. Data show a wide range of feet/footwear objects to be arousing. Such interests were often associated with particular types of men, yet interests were subject to change over time. Fetishistic arousal rested on both sensual and symbolic aspects of the fetish. Symbolically, it was the theme of “masculinity” that made male feet/footwear arousing, showing parallels to “femininity” evoked by female feet/footwear for male heterosexual fetishists. For many of the respondents, fetishism did not seem to be a substitute for living persons. Respondents had intimate relationships and were able to incorporate their fetish interests into stable relationships and less intimate ones. Considerable involvement in sadomasochistic practices was also found as was involvement in the gay world. Finally, nothing about a fetishistic interest seemed to preclude the development of subcultural forms around the practice.

Key words

fetishism homosexuality sexual relationships sadomasochism subcultures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R), 3rd ed., rev., APA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein, P., and Schwartz, P. (1983).American Couples, Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Diamond, M., and Karlen, A. (1980).Sexual Decisions, Little, Brown, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, H. (1920).Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Davis, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  5. Gebhard, P. (1969). Fetishism and sadomasochism.Sci. Psychoanal. 15: 71–80.Google Scholar
  6. Gosselin, C., and Wilson G. (1980).Sexual Variations: Fetishism, Sadomasochism and Transvestism, Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  7. Hirschfeld, M. (1975).Sex in Human Relationships, AMS Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Kelley, K., and Byrne, D. (1992).Exploring Human Sexuality, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, J. (1979). The social organization of sexual risk.Altern. Lifestyles. 21: 69–100.Google Scholar
  10. Lemert, E. (1951).Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior, MacGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Masters, W., Johnson, V., and Kolodny, R. (1992).Human Sexuality, Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Storr, A. (1964).Sexual Deviation, Penguin Books, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  13. Stoller, R. (1975).Perversion, Dell, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Weinberg, M., Williams C., and Calhan, C. (1993). If the Shoe Fits ⋯: Preferential and Pathological Models of Fetishism. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Weinberg, M., Williams, C., and Moser, C. (1984). The social constituents of sadomasochism.Soc. Probl. 31: 379–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin S. Weinberg
    • 1
  • Colin J. Williams
    • 2
  • Cassandra Calhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations