Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 339–348 | Cite as

Acoustic and perceptual implications of the transsexual voice

  • Deborah Günzburger


Two experiments are described concerning voice characteristics of male-to-female transsexuals. In the speech production experiment isolated words and longer utterances were realized in a male and female mode by subjects. Speech samples were analyzed as to a number of acoustic parameters and compared intraindividually. It appeared that, in spite of anatomical constraints, subjects were able to realize a number of vocal characteristics that are known to add to a feminine voice quality in the female speaking mode. In the second experiment, consisting of a perceptual task, male and female versions of some speech samples were presented pairwise to a panel of listeners who were able to identify the intended speaker sex mode. Perceptual results thus corroborate the acoustic findings.

Key words

voice speech language transsexual 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addington, D. W. (1968). The relationship of selected vocal characteristics of personality perception.Speech Monogr. 35(4): 492–508.Google Scholar
  2. Anshen, F. (1969).Speech variation among Negroes in a small Southern community. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
  3. Aronovitch, C. D. (1976). The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker.J. Soc. Psychol. 99: 207–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman, R. O. (1983). Acoustic correlates of speaker sex identification: Implications for the transsexual voice.J. Sex Res. 19: 293–306.Google Scholar
  5. Edgerton, M. T. (1974). The surgical treatment of transsexuals.Clin. Plastic Surg. 1.Google Scholar
  6. Fant, G. (1960).Acoustic Theory of Speech Production Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Fant, G. (1968). Analysis and synthesis of speech processes. In Malmberg, B. (ed.),Manual of Phonetics North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 173–277.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, J. L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant.Word 14: 47–56.Google Scholar
  9. Günzburger, D. (1989). Voice adaptation by transsexuals.Clin. Linguist. Phonet. 3.2: 163–172.Google Scholar
  10. Günzburger, D. (1993). An acoustic analysis and some perceptual data concerning voice change in male-female transsexuals.Eur. J. Disorders of Communication 28.1: 13–21.Google Scholar
  11. Günzburger, D., Bresser, A., and ter Keurs, M. (1987). Voice identification of prepubertal boys and girls by normally sighted and visually handicapped subjects.Lang. Speech 30: 47–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlsson, I. (1992). Analysis and synthesis of different voices with emphasis on female speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  13. Key, M. R. (1975).Male/Female Language Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Labov, W. (1966).The Social Stratification of English in New York City Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. McConnell-Ginet, S. (1975). Intonation in the social context: Language and sex. Paper presented at the Ninth International Congress in Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  16. McConnell-Ginet, S. (1983). Intonation in a man's world. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., and Henley, N. (eds.),Language, Gender and Society. Google Scholar
  17. Meditch, A. (1975). The development of sex-specific speech patterns in young children.Anthropol. Linguist. 17(9): 421–465.Google Scholar
  18. Milroy, L. (1980).Language and Social Networks Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Ohala, J. J. (1984). Ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice.Phonetica 41: 1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sachs, J., Lieberman, P., and Erickson, D. (1973). Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. In Shuy, R. W., and Fasold, R. W. (eds.),Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, P. N. (1985).Language, the Sexes and Society Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Sundberg, J. (1974). Articulatory interpretation of the “singing formant.”J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55: 838–844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sundberg, J. (1975). Formant technique in a professional female singer.Acustica 32: 89–96.Google Scholar
  24. Tanner, D. (1990).You Just Don't Understand. Women and Men in Conversation Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Terrango, L. (1966). Pitch and duration characteristics of the oral reading of males on a masculinity-femininity dimension.J. Speech Hearing Res. 9: 590–595.Google Scholar
  26. Tielen, M. T. J. (1992). Male and female speech. An experimental study of sex-related voice and pronunciation characteristics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Thorne, B., and Henley, N. (eds.). (1975).Language and Sex Newbury House, Rowley, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., and Henley, B. (eds.). (1983).Language, Gender and Society Newbury House, Rowley, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfram, W. (1969).A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Günzburger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PhoneticsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations