Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 553–563 | Cite as

The basis of the abused abuser theory of pedophilia: A further elaboration on an earlier study

  • Kurt Freund
  • Michael Kuban
Article

Abstract

The connection between the retrospective self-report of sexual abuse in child-hood by an adult person, and (i) erotically preferred age bracket and (ii) type of offense, was investigated in 303 heterosexual males. This group consisted of 83 pedophilic sex offenders against female children, 52 sex offenders against female children who erotically preferred adult women, 34 sex offenders against adult women, and 134 volunteer controls. An earlier exploratory investigation with somewhat smaller numbers of individuals had rendered only ambiguous results. After regrouping of individuals and more precise analysis of results, the present study demonstrated that the self-report of having been sexually abused in childhood is mainly connected with pedophilia. Status as a sex offender in general was not related to childhood abuse.

Key words

sexual abuse pedophilia sex offenders phallometric method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, A., and Houston D. (1990). Legal, social, and biological definitions of pedophilia.Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 333–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Finkelhor, D. (1984).Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Freund, K. (1967). Diagnosing homo- or heterosexuality and erotic age-preference by means of a psychophysiological test.Behav. Res. Ther. 5; 209–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Freund, K. (1965).Erotic Preferences Examination Scheme. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Freund, K., and Watson, R. (1990). Mapping the boundaries of courtship disorder.J. Sex Res. 27: 589–606.Google Scholar
  6. Freund, K., and Watson, R. (1991). Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of a phallometric test: An update of “Phallometric Diagnosis of Pedophilia.”Psychol. Assess. 3: 254–260.Google Scholar
  7. Freund, K., Watson, R., and Dickey, R. (1990). Does sexual abuse in childhood cause pedophilia: An exploratory study.Arch. Sex. Behav. 19: 557–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garland, R., and Dougher, M. (1990). The abused/abuser hypothesis of child abuse: A critical review of theory and research. In Feierman, J. R. (ed.),Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 488–509.Google Scholar
  9. Gebhard, P., Gagnon, J., Pomeroy, W., and Christenson, C. (1965).Sex Offenders. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Groth, A. N., and Burgess, A. W. (1977). Motivational intent in the sexual assault on children.Crim. Justice Behav. 4: 253–264.Google Scholar
  11. Hindman, J. (1988). Research disputes assumptions about child molesters.NDAA Bull. 7: 1–3.Google Scholar
  12. Hollingshead, A. and Redlich, F. (1958).Social Class and Mental Illness: A Community Study, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Krafft-Ebing, R. (1965).Psychopathia Sexualis, Klaf, F. S. (trans.), Stein and Day, New York. (Original work published 1886)Google Scholar
  14. Mohr, J. W., Turner, R. E., and Jerry, M. B. (1964).Pedophilia and Exhibitionism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Freund
    • 1
  • Michael Kuban
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioural SexologyClarke Institute of PsychiatryTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations