Advertisement

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 34, Issue 5, pp 677–680 | Cite as

Campylobacter pylori in alcoholic hemorrhagic “gastritis”

  • Loren Laine
  • Myriam Marin-Sorensen
  • Wilfred M. Weinstein
Original Articles

Abstract

Previously we have shown that alcohol- associated subepithelial hemorrhages histologically represent localized superficial mucosal hemorrhage, with edema in the surrounding mucosa. We studied the relationship between Campylobacter pylori (CP)and histology in gastric subepithelial hemorrhages from 20 actively drinking alcoholic patients. Biopsies of the hemorrhagic lesions and adjacent mucosa 1 and 3 cm away were taken with a “jumbo” forceps. Biopsy slides were coded and randomized before histologic scoring and examination for CP. CP was present in 15/20 (75%)biopsies of subepithelial hemorrhages and in 32/40 (80%)biopsies from surrounding mucosa. The mean hemorrhage score was not significantly different in biopsies of subepithelial hemorrhages with and without CP (2.7±0.4 vs 3.2±0.4)and the edema scores in adjacent, nonhemorrhagic mucosa were similar in specimens with and without CP (2.0±0.3 vs 1.6±0.5).The inflammatory cell density was significantly greater in CP-positive biopsies than in CP-negative specimens (2.0±0.2 vs 0.5±0.2, P<0.05)with the mononuclear cell and neutrophil scores contributing equally to the overall inflammatory cell score. Almost a quarter of CP-positive specimens (11/47)had no inflammation. The mean score for lining epithelial abnormalities was also significantly higher in biopsy specimens positive for CP (1.7±0.2 vs 0.5±0.3, P<0.05).In conclusion, CP is present in 75% of alcohol- associated subepithelial hemorrhages, but its prevalence is similar in adjacent, nonhemorrhagic mucosa. No relationship exists between the presence of CP and the characteristic histologic abnormalities of these subepithelial hemorrhages.

Key words

Campylobacter pylori alcohol hemorrhage gastritis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dooley CP, Cohen H: The clinical significance ofCampylobacter pylori. Ann Intern Med 108:70–79, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laine L, Weinstein WM: Histology of alcoholic hemorrhagic “gastritis”: A prospective evaluation. Gastroenterology 94: 1254–1262, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shepherd HA, Harvey J, Jackson A, Colin-Jones DG: Recurrent retching with gastric mucosal prolapse: A proposed prolapse gastropathy syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 29:121–128, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hazell SL, Hennessy WB, Borody TJ, Carrick J, Ralston M, Brady L, Lee A:Campylobacter pyloridis gastritis II: Distribution of bacteria and associated inflammation in the gastroduodenal environment. Am J Gastroenterol 82:297–301, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnston BJ, Reed PI, Ali MH: Incidence ofCampylobacter pyloridis within normal and inflammed gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 92:1456, 1987(abstract).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borsch G, Adamek R, Sandmann M, Wegener M, Schmidt G, Leverkus F, Reitmeyer E: Comparison of biopsy urease test and histologic examination for detection ofCampylobacter pylori in duodenal, antral and fundic biopsies. Hepatogastroenterology 34:236–241, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peterson WL, Lee E, Feldman M: Relationship betweenCampylobacter pylori and gastritis in healthy humans after administration of placebo or indomethacin. Gastroenterology 95:1185–1197, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wyatt JI, Rathbone BJ, Hentley RV: Local immune response to gastricCampylobacter in non-ulcer dyspepsia. J Clin Pathol 39:863–870, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marshall BJ, Warren JR: Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1:1311–1315, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen LP, Holck S, Povlsen CO, Elsborg L, Justesen T:Campylobacter pyloridis in peptic ulcer disease I. Gastric and duodenal infection caused byC. pyloridis: Histopathologic and microbiologic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol 22:219–224, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitehead R: Mucosal Biopsy of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1985Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Slomiany BL, Bilski J, Sarosiek J, Murty VLN, Dworkin B, VanHorn K, Zielenski J, Slomiany A:Campylobacter pyloridis degrades mucin and undermines gastric mucosal integrity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 144:307–314, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarosiek J, Slomiany A, VanHorn K, Zalesna G, Slomiany BL: Lipolytic activity ofCampylobacter pylori: Effect of sofalcone. Gastroenterology 96:A399, 1988(abstract)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O'Connor HJ, Wyatt JI, Ward DC, Dixon MF, Axon ATR, Dewar EP, Johnston D: Effect of duodenal ulcer surgery and enterogastric reflux onCampylobacter pyloridis.Lancet 2:1178–1181, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Connor HJ, Axon AT, Dixon MF:Campylobacter-like organisms unusual in type A (pernicious anemia) gastritis. Lancet 2:1091, 1984 (letter)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loren Laine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Myriam Marin-Sorensen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wilfred M. Weinstein
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Gastroenterology Sections, Departments of MedicineUSC and UCLA Schools of MedicineLos AngelesCalifornia
  2. 2.Center for Ulcer Research and EducationLos AngelesCalifornia

Personalised recommendations