Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 461–469 | Cite as

Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet, and gambling

  • Howard J. Shaffer
Articles

Abstract

This article describes how using new computer technology and the Internet for gambling can represent both the means and object of addiction. However, these technological factors do not represent the cause of addictive behavior. Given the widespread availability of computer technology and the remarkable expansion of the Internet, it is not surprising, however, that these technological advances have become associated with intemperate gambling activities. By discussing the concept of addiction and its associated social setting, neurochemistry, and gaming characteristics, this article suggests that addiction is the result of shifts in subjective experience and that new technology and the Internet can provide relatively reliable and potent contemporary vehicles for changing emotional states.

Keywords

Technological Advance Emotional State Computer Technology Subjective Experience Social Setting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benjamin, J., Lin, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B. D., Murphy, D. L., & Hammer, D. H. (1996). Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking.Nature Genetics, 12(January), 81–83.Google Scholar
  2. Bulkeley, W. M. (1995, August 16). Feeling Luck? Electronics is bringing gambling into homes, restaurants and planes.Wall Street Journal, pp. 1, A7.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, G. (1996). The Internet: Promise and peril in cyberspace. InMicrosoft Encarta96 Encyclopedia. Redmond, CA: Microsoft Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Courtwright, D. T. (1982).Dark paradise. Opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R., Priel, B., Osher, Y., Blaine, D., Bennett, E. R., Nemanov, L., Katz, M., & Belmaker, R. H. (1996). Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking.Nature Genetics, 12(January), 78–80.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, J. (1989). Confession of a low roller. In R. Atwan (Ed.),The best American essays 1989 (pp. 98–113). New York: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
  7. Hyman, S.E. (1994). Why does the brain prefer opium to broccoli?Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 2, 43–6.Google Scholar
  8. Hyman, S.E., & Nestler, E.J. (1993).The molecular foundations of psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jabs, C. (1996, May 21). Fatal distraction?HOMEPC, 3, 66–70, 76, 78.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, D. (1989). A general theory of addictions: rationale for and evidence supporting a new approach for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. In Shaffer, H.J., Stein, S., Gambino, B., & Cummings, T. N. (Eds.).Compulsive gambling: theory, research & practice, (pp. 36–64). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Marlatt, G.A. (1988). Matching clients to treatment: treatment models and stages of change. In Donovan, D.M. & Marlatt, G.A. (Eds.)Assessment of addictive behaviors, (pp. 474–484). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Marlatt, G.A., Baer, J.S., Dovovan, D.M., & Kivlahan, D.R. (1988). Addictive behaviors: Etiology and treatment.Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 223–252.Google Scholar
  13. Milkman, H.B., & Sunderwirth, S.G. (1987).Craving for ecstasy: the consciousness & chemistry of escape. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  14. Murray, B. (1996). Computer addictions entangle students.The APA Monitor, 27(6), 3839.Google Scholar
  15. National Association of Attorneys General. (1996, May/June). Executive summary of Internet gambling report.NAAG Gaming Developments Bulletin, 12.Google Scholar
  16. O'neill, M. (1995, March 8). The lure and addiction of life on line.The New York Times, pp. C1, C6.Google Scholar
  17. Reuters News Service. (1992, November 25). Cigarette shortage in Italy draws tobacconist protest.Boston Globe.Google Scholar
  18. Shaffer, H.J. (1996). Conceptual crises and the addictions: a philosophy of science perspective.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 3, 285–296.Google Scholar
  19. Shaffer, H.J. (1987). The assessment and diagnosis of addictive disorders: The use of clinical reflection and hypotheses testing.Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 4, 103–113.Google Scholar
  20. Shaffer, H.J. (1992). The psychology of stage change: the transition from addiction to recovery, in J.H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R.B. Millman (Eds.),Comprehensive Textbook of Substance Abuse-2nd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 100–105.Google Scholar
  21. Shaffer, H.J. (1993). Denial, ambivalence and countertransference hate, in J.D. Levin & R. Weiss (Eds.),Alcoholism: Dynamics and Treatment. Northdale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc., 421–437.Google Scholar
  22. Shaffer, H.J. (in press). The most important unresolved issue in the addictions: conceptual chaos.International Journal of the Addictions.Google Scholar
  23. Shaffer, H.J. & Burglass, M.E. (Eds.) (1981).Classic contributions in the addictions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  24. Shaffer, H.J., & Gambino, B. (1983). Addiction Paradigms III: From Theory-Research to Practice and Back.Advance in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 3, 135–152.Google Scholar
  25. Shaffer, H.J., & Robbins, M. (1991). Manufacturing multiple meanings of addiction: time-limited realities,Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 13(5), 387–404.Google Scholar
  26. Shaffer, H.J., & Robbins, M. (1995). Psychotherapy for Addictive Behaviors: A Stage Change Approach to Meaning Making, in A. M. Washton (Ed.),Psychotherapy and Substance Abuse: A Practitioner's Handbook. New York: Guilford Publications, 103–123.Google Scholar
  27. Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., Walsh, J.S., & Vander Bilt, J. (1995). The psychosocial consequences of gambling. In R. Tannenwald (Ed.),Casino development: How would casinos affect New England's economy. Special Report No. 2. Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 130–141.Google Scholar
  28. Wray, I., & Dickerson, M. (1981). Cessation of high frequency gambling and “withdrawal” symptoms.British Journal of Addiction, 76, 401–405.Google Scholar
  29. Zinberg, N.E. (1984).Drug, set, and setting: the basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zinberg, N. E., & Fraser, K. M. (1979). The role of the social setting in the prevention and treatment of alcoholism. In J. Mendelson & N. Mello (Eds.),The Diagnosis & Treatment of Alcoholism (pp. 359–385). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 1
  1. 1.Division on AddictionsHarvard Medical SchoolBoston

Personalised recommendations