Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 211–220 | Cite as

Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process

  • Mark A. Runco
  • Shawn M. Okuda
Article

Abstract

Previous empirical research suggests that problem discovery is an important step in the creative process. The present investigation was conducted to examine the role of problem discovery in the divergent thinking and creative performance of adolescents. Three divergent thinking tests were administered to a group of adolescents. Each test contained three presentedproblems and one discoveredproblem. The discovered problem allowed the adolescents to think of a problem and then to provide solutions. Comparisons indicated that the adolescents generated significantly more responses to the discovered problems than the presented problems. Most important was that the unique variance of the discovered problems (controlling the variance shared with scores from the presented problems) was reliable and significantly related to five indices of creative performance. These results support the componential theory of divergent thinking and creativity, and are consistent with the developmental view of problem finding.

Keywords

Health Psychology Empirical Research Unique Variance Creative Process Creative Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, R. S., and Runco, M. A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In Sternberg, R. J., and Davidson, J. E. (eds.).Conceptions of Giftedness. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A. (1983).Psychological Testing, 5th ed. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Arlin, P. K. (1975). Cognitive development in adulthood: A fifth stage?Develop. Psychol. 11: 602–606.Google Scholar
  4. Bransford, J. D., and Stein, B. S. (1984).The Ideal Problem Solver. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Getzels, J. W. (1970). Concern for discovery: An attitudinal component of creative production.J. Personal. 38: 91–105.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Getzels, J. W. (1971). Discovery-oriented behavior and the originality of creative products: A study with artists.J. Personal. and Social. Psychol. 19: 47–52.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, J. E., and Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness.Gifted Child Quart. 28: 58–64.Google Scholar
  9. Getzels, J. W. (1975). Problem-finding and the inventiveness of solutions.J. Creative Behav. 9: 12–18.Google Scholar
  10. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity.Intelligence 4: 25–40.Google Scholar
  11. Moore, M. T. (1985). The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem-discovery process: A study of creative and noncreative middle school students.Res. Teaching English 19: 84–95.Google Scholar
  12. Owen, S. V., and Baum, S. M. (1985). The validity of the measurement of originality.Educat. Psychol. Meas. 45: 939–944.Google Scholar
  13. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition.Phi Delta Kappan 60: 180–184.Google Scholar
  14. Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests.Percept. Motor Skills 59: 711–717.Google Scholar
  15. Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement.Percept. Motor Skills 61: 1075–1081.Google Scholar
  16. Runco, M. A. (1986a). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children.Psychol. Schools 23: 308–315.Google Scholar
  17. Runco, M. A. (1986b). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children.Educat. Psychol. Meas. 46: 375–384.Google Scholar
  18. Runco, M. A. (1986c). Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking.J. Psychol. 120: 345–352.Google Scholar
  19. Runco, M. A. (1986d). The discriminant validity of gifted children's divergent thinking test scores.Gifted Child Quart. 30: 78–82.Google Scholar
  20. Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creativity in gifted and nongifted children.Gifted Child Quart. 31: 121–125.Google Scholar
  21. Wakefield, J. F. (1985). Towards creativity: Problem finding in a divergent-thinking exercise.Child Study J. 15: 265–270.Google Scholar
  22. Wallach, M. A., and Kogan, N. (1965).Modes of Thinking in Young Children. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Wallach, M. A., and Wing, C. W., Jr. (1969).The Talented Student. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark A. Runco
    • 1
  • Shawn M. Okuda
    • 2
  1. 1.California State UniversityFullerton
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentClaremont Graduate SchoolClaremont

Personalised recommendations