Identification of consistent responding to auditory stimuli by a functionally “deaf” autistic child

  • Robert L. Koegel
  • Laura Schreibman


Although the severity of autistic children's unresponsiveness to external stimulation has been frequently reported, little empirical work has been conducted to specifically describe the nature of their unresponsiveness. The child who participated in this experiment was at varying times reported to be deaf, hard of hearing, or functionally deaf; and at other times was reported to have normal hearing. In this experiment, we measured his responses to systematically presented auditory stimuli in order to determine if there was any pattern to his responding. Two types of auditory stimuli were used: (a) white noise, consisting of most of the frequencies within the human range of hearing, and (b) the sound of a candy machine delivering candy. The results showed the following. (1) There was consistent responding to both the white noise and the candy feeder. (2) The thresholds for responding to the white noise were always consistent on a given day, but varied from day to day. (3) Responding to the candy machine stimulus always occurred at sound levels which were well below the threshold for the white noise. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding autism, and in particular in terms of understanding the lack of speech development in mute autistic children.


White Noise Mute Auditory Stimulus Empirical Work Autistic Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anthony, J. An experimental approach to the psychopathology of childhood: Autism.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 1958,31, 211–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, J. P., & Lind, D. L. Experimental analysis of hysterical blindness.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1961,4, 331–339.Google Scholar
  3. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Holland, J. G. New directions in teaching machine research. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.),Programmed learning and computer based instruction. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. Kanner, L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact.The Nervous Child, 1943,3, 217–250.Google Scholar
  6. Kanner, L. Early infantile autism.Journal of Pediatrics, 1944,25, 211–217.Google Scholar
  7. Kelleher, R. T., & Gollub, L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962,5, 543–597.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Koegel, R. L., & Rincover, A. Some detrimental effects of using extra stimuli to guide learning in autistic and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1976,5, 59–71.Google Scholar
  9. Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. The role of stimulus variables in teaching autistic children. In O. I. Lovaas & B. B. Bucher (Eds.),Perspectives in behavior modification with deviant children. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Koegel, R. L., & Wilhelm, H. Selective responding to the components of multiple visual cues.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1973,15, 442–453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovaas, O. I., & Schreibman, L. Stimulus overselctivity of autistic children in a two stimulus situation.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1971,9, 305–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovaas, O. I., Schreibman, L., Koegel, R. L., & Rehm, R. Selective responding by autistic children to multiple sensory input.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971,77, 211–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ornitz, E. M., & Ritvo, E. R. Perceptual inconstancy in early infantile autism.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1968,18, 76–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reynolds, B. S., Newsom, C. D., & Lovaas, O. I. Auditory overselectivity in autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1974,2, 253–263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rimland, B.Infantile autism: The syndrome and its implications for a neural theory of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964.Google Scholar
  16. Rincover, A., & Koegel, R. L. Setting generality and stimulus control in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 235–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothenberg, M. The rebirth of Jonny.Harper's Magazine, 1960,220 (February), 57–66.Google Scholar
  18. Schopler, E. Early infantile autism and receptor processes.Archives of General Psychiatry, 1965,13, 327–335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schreibman, L. Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1975,8, 91–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schreibman, L., & Lovaas, O. I. Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1973,1, 152–168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Koegel
    • 2
  • Laura Schreibman
    • 1
  1. 1.Claremont Men's CollegeClaremont
  2. 2.Institute for Applied Behavioral ScienceUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraSanta Barbara

Personalised recommendations