Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 439–450 | Cite as

Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend

  • Kathryn A. Urberg


This study examined the relative influence of the best friends and social crowds of older adolescents on cigarette smoking. The data were examined to determine if there were differences in influence as a function of sex, conformity, or the mutuality of the friendship. This study used a longitudinal design that enabled the separation of the effects of peer influence from those of selective association. The results showed that social crowds differed in mean level of cigarette smoking, with burnouts smoking the most and jock/preps smoking the least. The majority of best friendships were homogeneous for social crowd. Best friend influence predicted change in cigarette smoking over a one-year period, while social crowd influence appeared to be minimal. Conformity was positively related to susceptibility to peer influence, although mutuality of the friendship and sex of the subject were not.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables.J. Exp. Social Psychol. 6: 466–487.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents.Develop. Psychol. 15: 608–616.Google Scholar
  4. Braucht, G. N. (1980). Psychosocial research on teenage drinking: Past and future. In Scarpetti, F. R., and Batesman, S. K. (eds.),Drugs and Youth Culture Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B. B. (1989). The role of peer groups in adolescents' adjustment to secondary school. In Berndt, T. J., and Ladd, G. W. (eds.),Peer Relationships in Child Development. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B., Clasen, D., & Niess, J. (1987, April). Smoke in the looking glass: Adoelscents' perceptions of their peer group status. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., and Petrie, S. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence.J. Adolesc. 9: 73–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clasen, D., & Brown, B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence.J. Youth Adolesc. 14: 451–468.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity.Sociol. Educat. 50: 227–241.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1983). Commentary: The relationship between friendship selection and peer influence. In Epstein, J. L., and Karweit, N. (eds.),Friends in School. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Cronbach, L., and Furby, L. (1970). How should we measure “change”—Or should we?Psychol. Bull. 74: 68–80.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, M., and Kandel, D. (1981). Parental and peer influences on adolescents' educational plans: some further evidence.Am. J. Sociol. 87: 363–387.Google Scholar
  13. Dunphy, D. C. (1963). The Social structure of urban adolescent peer groups.Sociometry 26: 230–246.Google Scholar
  14. Eagly, A. (1983). Gender and social influence.Am. Psychol. 38: 971–981.Google Scholar
  15. Eckert, P. (1989).Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, J. (1983). The selection of friends on achievement and affective outcomes. In Epstein, J., and Karweit, N. (eds.),Friends in School: Patterns of Selection and Influence. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Gollob, H., and Reichardt, C. (19877) Taking account of lime lags in causal models.Child Develop. 58: 80–92.Google Scholar
  18. Jones, E. and Sigal, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.Psychol. Bull. 76: 349–364.Google Scholar
  19. Kandel, D. (1978a). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs.J. Personal. Sociol. Psychol. 36: 306–312.Google Scholar
  20. Kandel, D. (1978b). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 427–436.Google Scholar
  21. Kandel, D. (1985). On processes of peer influences in adolescent drug use: A developmental perspective.Alcohol Substance Abuse Adolesc.Google Scholar
  22. Kandel, D., Kessler, R., and Margulies, R. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into stages of drug use: A developmental analysis.J. Youth Adolesc. 7: 13–40.Google Scholar
  23. Lanese, R., Banks, F., and Keller, M. (1972). Smoking behavior in a teenage population: A multivariate conceptual approach.Am. J. Public Health 62: 807–812.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mosbach, P., and Leventhal, H. (1988). Peer group identity and smoking: Implications for intervention.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 97: 238–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pechacek, T., Murray, D., Luepker, R., Mittelmark, M., Johnson, C., and Shultz, J. (1984). Measurement of adolescent smoking behavior: Rationale and methods.J. Behav. Med. 7: 12–29.Google Scholar
  26. Riester, A. E., and Zucker, R. A. (1968). Adolescent social structure and drinking behavior.Person. Guid. J. 23: 304–312.Google Scholar
  27. Rugosa, D., Brandt, D., and Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change.Psychol. Bull. 92: 726–748.Google Scholar
  28. Sherman, S. J., Presson, C. C., Chassin, L., Corty, E., and Olshavsky, R. (1983). The false consensus effect in estimates of smoking prevalence: Underlying mechanisms.Personal. Social Psychol. Bull. 9: 197–208.Google Scholar
  29. Shrum, W., & Cheek, N. (1987). Social structure during the school years: Onset of the degrouping process.Am. Sociol. Rev. 52: 218–223.Google Scholar
  30. Wilcox, S., and Udry, R. (1986). Autism and accuracy in adolescent perceptions of friends' sexual attitudes and behavior.J. Appl. Psychol. 16: 361–374.Google Scholar
  31. Urbert, K. A., and Deqirmencioglu, S. (1990). Peer influence on adolescent values. Paper presented at meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, 1989.Google Scholar
  32. Urberg, K. A., Shyu, S. J., and Liang, J. (1990). Peer influence in adolescent cigarette smoking.Addict. Behav. 115: 247–255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn A. Urberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentWayne State UniversityDetroit

Personalised recommendations