Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 385–405 | Cite as

Undivided interest and the growth of talent: A longitudinal study of adolescents

  • Kevin Rathunde
  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi


Based on theoretical considerations drawn from John Dewey and others, and using the Experience Sampling Method to longitudinally investigate a group of talented high school students,undivided interest was operationalized as times when the students felt above average spontaneous interest (i.e., excitement, openness, and involvement) while also reporting above average goal-directed interest (i.e., that their task was important to their goals). Results showed that after adjusting for the effects of family background, scholastic aptitude, and other individual differences, undivided interest while doing talent-related activities was positively correlated with independent assessments of talent area performance three years later: the level of mastery students achieved as indicated by their school records, the ratings students received from their talent area teachers, and the students' assessments of their own level of engagement. Highly engaged students reported over twice as much undivided interest in comparison to a group of disengaged students, who reported more divided interest (i.e., more of what Dewey referred to as “fooling”—high spontaneous involvement with no goal direction; and more “drudgery”—low spontaneous involvement and high goal direction). These findings held regardless of whether the teenagers were talented in math, science, music, or art. The implications of the study are discussed in terms of contemporary theories of attention and cognitive development, as well as unproductive educational philosophies that pit these important dimensions of experience against each other.


High School Student Cognitive Development Family Background Rating Student Educational Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apter, M. J. (1989).Reversal Theory: Motivation, Emotion, and Personality. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  2. Berlyne, D. E. (1960).Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Block, J. (1982). Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development.Child Develop. 53: 281–295.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1990).Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Larson, R., and Prescott, S. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience.J. Youth Adolesc. 6: 281–294.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method.J. Nerv. Mental Dis. 175: 526–536.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rathunde, K. (in press). The measurement of flow in everyday life: Towards a theory of emergent motivation. In Jacobs, J. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 40: Developmental Perspectives on Motivation (pp. 57–98). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., and Whalen, S. (1993).Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1933).How We Think. D. C. Heath, Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Fiske, D. W., and Maddi, S. (1986).Functions of Varied Experience. Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Gendlin, E. (1962).Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Getzels, J. (1975). Creativity: Prospects and issues. In Taylor, I., and Getzels, J. W. (eds.),Perspectives in Creativity. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Hadamard, J. (1954).The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Izard, C. E. (1977).Human Emotions. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, D. (1984).Personality Research Form Manual. Research Psychologists Press, Port Huron, MI.Google Scholar
  17. James, W. (1917).Selected Papers on Philosophy. J. M. Dent & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  18. Piaget, J. (1962).Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Rathunde, K. (1988). Family context and optimal experience. In Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (eds.),Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Rathunde, K. (1989). The context of optimal experience: An exploratory model of the family.New Ideas Psychol. 7: 91–97.Google Scholar
  21. Rathunde, K. (1992). Playful and serious interest: Two faces of talent development in adolescence. In Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., and Ambroson, D. L. (eds.),Talent Development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. & Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Trillium Press, Unionville, NY.Google Scholar
  22. Rathunde, K. (in press). The experience of interest: A theoretical and empirical look at its role in adolescent talent development. In Pintrich, P., and Maehr, M. (eds.),Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 8). JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
  23. Rathunde, K., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Adolescent happiness and family interaction. Pillemer, K., and McCartney, K. (eds.),Parent-Child Relations Throughout Life. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. Rogoff, B. (1990).Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychol Rev. 84: 1–66.Google Scholar
  26. Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychol. Rev. 84: 127–190.Google Scholar
  27. Simonton, D. K. (1984).Genius, Creativity, and Leadership. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Stein, M. (1986).Gifted, Talented, and Creative Young People: A Guide to Theory and Research. Garland, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Rathunde
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer StudiesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UtahUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations