A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States
- 287 Downloads
Information concerning bowel habits was gathered from a representative sample of 14,407 United States adults in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 1971–1975 and approximately 10 years later among the same individuals. The prevalence of self-reported constipation, diarrhea, infrequent defecation (three or fewer bowel movements per week), and frequent defecation (two or more bowel movements per day) increased with aging. Women were more likely than men (P<0.05) to report constipation (20.8% compared to 8.0%) and infrequent defecation (9.1% compared to 3.2%). Blacks were more likely than whites to report infrequent defecation (P<0.05). Older respondents reporting constipation were more likely to use laxatives or stool softeners than younger respondents reporting constipation, but they were also less likely to have infrequent defecation. To evaluate factors predictive of impaired bowel function, case definitions were created using information concerning complaint of constipation, laxative use, frequency of defecation, and stool consistency. Female gender, black race, fewer years of education, low physical activity, and symptoms of depression were independent risk factors for impaired bowel function. This study provides national estimates of bowel complaints and their natural history and examines possible risk factors for constipation.
Key wordsconstipation diarrhea aging epidemiology prevalence laxatives
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Devroede G: Constipation.In Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, 4th ed. MH Sleisenger, JS Fordtran (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1989, pp 331–368Google Scholar
- 3.Miller HW: Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey, United States 1971–1973, part A— development, plan, and operation.In Vital and Health Statistics, Series 1, No. 10a. DHEW publication No. (HRA) 76-1310. Rockville, Maryland, National Center for Health Statistics, 1973, pp 1–46Google Scholar
- 4.Shah BV: SESUDAAN: Standard errors program for computing of standardized rates from sample survey data. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Research Triangle Institute, 1981, pp 1–33, RTI/5250/00-01SGoogle Scholar
- 5.Madans JH, Kleinman JC, Cox CS, Barbano H, Feldman JJ, Cohen B, Finucane FF, Lorroni-Huntley J: 10 years after NHANES I: Report of initial follow-up, 1982–84. Public Health Rep 101:465–473, 1986Google Scholar
- 7.Devins GM, Orme CM: Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale.In Test Critiques, Vol 2. DJ Keyser, RC Sweetland (eds). Kansas City, Montana, 1985, pp 144–160Google Scholar
- 8.Landis JR, Lepkowski JM, Eklund SA, Stenhouwer SA: A statistical methodology for analyzing data from a complex survey: The first national health and nutrition examination survey.In Vital and health statistics, Series 2, No. 92. DHHS publication No. (PHS)82-1366. Hyattsville, Maryland, National Center for Health Statistics, 1982, pp 1–52.Google Scholar
- 10.SAS Institute Inc: SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. The FREQ procedure. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc., 1985, pp 403–432Google Scholar
- 11.SAS Institute Inc: SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide, Version 5 Edition. The LOGIST Procedure. Cary, North Carolina, SAS Institute Inc., 1986, pp 269–294Google Scholar
- 16.Milne JS, Williamson J: Bowel habit in older people. Gerontol Clin 14:56–60, 1972Google Scholar
- 18.Hammond EC: Some preliminary findings on physical complaints from a prospective study of 1,064,004 men and women. Am J Public Health 54:11–23, 1964Google Scholar
- 21.Sandler RS, Jordan MC, Shelton BJ: Demographic and dietary determinants of constipation in the US population. Gastroenterology 94:A398, 1988Google Scholar