Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 595–615 | Cite as

Talking about sex: Common themes about sexuality in the prime-time television programs children and adolescents view most

  • L. Monique Ward


Although concern is often raised about television's role as a “teacher” about sexuality, little is known about the specific content of sexual messages on the programs children and adolescents view most. To explore this issue, a content analysis was conducted of the twelve prime-time television programs most preferred by children and adolescents. For three episodes of each program, all interactions between the characters were examined for the presence of verbal statements about sexual issues. Relevant statements extracted were coded using a list of 17 categories reflecting scripts about sexuality common in our culture. Findings indicated that discussions about sexuality were quite common on these programs. On average, 29% of the interactions on an individual episode contained verbal references to sexual issues, with the level surpassing 50% for some episodes. There were more messages about the male sexual role than about the female sexual role, and more that emphasized a recreational orientation toward sex than a procreational orientation. The most frequently occurring types of messages were those in which sexual relations were depicted as a competition, in which men commented on women's bodies and physical appearance, and in which masculinity was equated with being sexual. The importance of physical attractiveness as a key asset was emphasized for and by both sexes. Results are discussed concerning adolescents' potential uses of this input, and concerning directions for further study.


Content Analysis Common Theme Verbal Statement Physical Appearance Sexual Role 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (1983). The intimate relationship between gender roles and sexuality. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Bolton, F. G., and MacEachron, A. E. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality: A developmental perspective.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 259–273.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. D., Childers, K. W., and Waszak, C. S. (1990). Television and adolescent sexuality.J. Adoles. Health Care 11: 62–70.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.J. Personal. Social Psychol. 38: 217–230.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, W. A. (1983). Interpretation and inference in children's television viewing. In Bryant, J., Anderson, D. R. (eds.),Children's Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Colwill, N., and Lips, H. M. (1981). Power and sexuality. In Lips, H. (ed.),Women, Men, and the Psychology of Power. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality. Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
  8. DeLamater, J. (1989). The social control of human sexuality. In McKinney, K., and Sprecher, S. (eds.),Human Sexuality: The Societal and Interpersonal Context. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  9. Dorr, A. (1986).Television and Children: A Special Medium for a Special Audience. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandez-Collado, C., Greenberg, B. S., Korzenny, F., and Atkin, C. K. (1978). Sexual intimacy and drug use in TV series.J. Commun. 28: 30–37.Google Scholar
  11. Franzblau, S., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1977). Sex on TV: A content analysis.J. Commun. 27: 164–170.Google Scholar
  12. Gagnon, J., and Simon, W. (1973).Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., and Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In Bryant, J., Zillman, D. (eds.),Perspectives on Media Effects. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  14. Gerzon, M. (1983). Let's have some new heroes: Thoughts on sexuality and masculinity.Child. Telev. 6: 33–39.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, S. (1983). Straight talk: Teenage sex is a health hazard.Child Telev. 6: 13–18.Google Scholar
  16. Greenberg, B. S., Abelman, R., and Neuendorf, K. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Afternoon delight.J. Commun. 31: 83–89.Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, B. S., and D'Alessio, D. (1985). Quantity and quality of sex in the soaps.J. Broadcast. Elec. Media, 29: 309–321.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, B. S., Stanley, C., Siemicki, M., Heeter, C., Soderman, A., and Linsangan, R. (1993). Sex content on soaps and prime-time television series most viewed by adolescents. In Greenberg, B. S., Brown, J. D., and Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L. (eds.),Media, Sex, and the Adolescent. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. Hendrick, S. S., and Hendrick, C. (1993, February). Gender, sexuality, and close relationships. Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Klein, M. (1983). Teens, sexuality and prime time entertainment.Child. Telev. 6: 19–24.Google Scholar
  21. Lott, B. (1987). Sexuality: A feminist perspective. In Kelley, K. (ed.),Females, Males, and Sexuality: Theories and Research. State University of New York Press, Albany:Google Scholar
  22. Lowry, D., Love, G., and Kirby, M. (1981). Sex on the soap operas: Patterns of intimacy.J. Commun. 31: 90–96.Google Scholar
  23. Marsiglio, W. (1988). Adolescent male sexuality and heterosexual masculinity: A conceptual model and review.J. Adoles. Res. 3: 85–303.Google Scholar
  24. McCormick, N. B. (1987). Sexual scripts: Social and therapeutic implications.Sex. Marital Ther., 2: 3–27.Google Scholar
  25. McCormick, N. B., and Jesser, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounter. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Monush, B. (ed.). (1994).International Television and Video Almanac. Quigley Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, J. E. (1983). Sexual socialization and gender roles in childhood. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Peplau, L. A., Rubin, A., and Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships.J. Social Issues 33: 86–109.Google Scholar
  29. Reed, D., and Weinberg, M. S. (1984). Premarital coitus: Developing and established sexual scripts.Social Psychol. Quart. 47: 129–138.Google Scholar
  30. Roberts, E. (1980).Childhood Sexual Learning: The Unwritten Curriculum. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Roberts, E. (1983). Teens, sexuality and sex: Our mixed messages.Child. Telev. 6: 9–12.Google Scholar
  32. Rose, S. (1985). Is romance dysfunctional?M. J. Women's Studies. 8, 250–265.Google Scholar
  33. Sapolsky, B. S., and Tabarlet, J. O. (1991). Sex in primetime television: 1979 versus 1989.J. Broadcast. Elect. Media 35: 505–516.Google Scholar
  34. Sherman, B., and Dominick, J. (1986). Violence and sex in music videos: TV and rock ‘n’ roll.J. Commun. 36: 79–93.Google Scholar
  35. Silverman, L. T., Sprafkin, J. N., and Rubinstein, E. A. (1979). Physical contact and sexual behavior on prime-time TV.J. Commun. 29: 33–43.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, C. (1991). Sex and genre on prime time.J. Homosex. 12: 119–138.Google Scholar
  37. Sprafkin, J. N., and Silverman, L. T. (1981). Update: Physically intimate and sexual behavior on prime-time TV, 1978–1979.J. Commun. 31: 34–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sprecher, S., and McKinney, K. (1993).Sexual Dimensions of Close Relationships. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Truglio, R. T. (1993, March). Sex in the 90s: What are the lessons from prime-time TV? Poster presented at the 60th meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  40. Unger, R., and Crawford, M. (1992).Women and Gender: A Feminist Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Wattleton, F. (1983). Truth or consequences.Child. Telev, 6: 19–21.Google Scholar
  42. Zellman, G. L., and Goodchilds, J. D. (1983). Becoming sexual in adolescence. In Allgeier, E. R., and McCormick, N. B. (eds.),Changing Boundaries: Gender Roles and Sexual Behavior. Mayfield, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Monique Ward
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations