Idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis
- 94 Downloads
The cause of recurrent acute pancreatitis can be identified in the majority of patients. A small group of patients in whom an etiological association is not obvious is characterized as idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (IRP). During the last seven years, we used endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincter of Oddi (SO) manometric pressure studies to investigate 116 patients initially diagnosed as IRP. Forty-four of the 116 patients were found to have a demonstrable cause of their pancreatitis. Appropriate therapeutic intervention was carried out in 43 of these patients with a favorable outcome in the majority of patients noted during long-term follow-up.
Key wordsidiopathic recurrent pancreatitis ERCP
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Ransom JM: Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: A review. Am J Gastroenterol 77:633–863, 1983Google Scholar
- 2.Soergel KH: Acute pancreatitis.In Gastrointestinal Disease, 2nd ed. Sleisenger and Fortran (eds). Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1983, pp 1463–1985Google Scholar
- 3.Howard JM: Pancreatitis associated with gallstone.In Surgical Diseases of the Pancreas. JM Howard, GL Jordan (eds). Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1960; pp 169–189Google Scholar
- 6.O'Sullivan JN, Nobrega FT, Morlock CG, et al: Acute and chronic pancreatitis in Rochester, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 3:373–379, 1972Google Scholar
- 8.Geenen JE, Hogan WJ: Endoscopic access to the papilla of Vater. Endoscopy 12:47–59, 1980Google Scholar
- 9.Venu RP, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ et al: Idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (IRP): Diagnostic role of ERCP and sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gastrointest Endosc 31(2):153, 1985Google Scholar
- 19.Berk T, Friedman LS, Goldstein SD, et al: Relapsing acute pancreatitis as the presenting manifestation of an ampullary neoplasm in a patient with familial polyposis. Am J Gastroenterol 8:627–629, 1985Google Scholar
- 22.Opie EL: The etiology of acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 12:182, 1901Google Scholar