Digestive Diseases and Sciences

, Volume 33, Issue 9, pp 1175–1177

Adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps cannot be reliably distinguished by their appearance through the fiberoptic sigmoidoscope

  • Robert G. Norfleet
  • Michael E. Ryan
  • J. B. Wyman
Original Articles

Abstract

This prospective study is designed to determine if experienced sigmoidoscopists can, from gross appearance, differentiate adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Six hundred eleven polyps discovered at fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy were removed completely or biopsied for histologic examination. The polyp's size, distance from the anal verge, color, and the endoscopist's diagnosis were analyzed. Hyperplastic polyps were significantly smaller, of lighter color, and located closer to the anus than adenomas. The sensitivity of the endoscopic diagnosis for adenomas is 0.80 and the specificity 0.71. We conclude the endoscopic diagnosis of polyps 1.0 cm and smaller is not accurate enough for decision making, and these should be biopsied to guide management. Since 97% of polyps larger than 1.0 cm are adenomas, their removal can be advised without biopsy.

Key words

colorectum adenoma hyperplastic polyp endoscopy screening flexible sigmoidoscope 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC: The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36:2251–2270, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franzin G, Dina R, Zamboni G, Iannucci A, Scarpa A, Novelli P: Hyperplastic (metaplastic) polyps of the colon: A histologic and histochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 9:687–698, 1984Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waye JD, Frankel A, Braunfeld SF: The histolopathology of small colon polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 26:80, 1980Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tedesco FJ, Hendrix JC, Pickens CA, Brady PG, Mills LR: Diminutive polyps: Histopathology, spatial distribution, and clinical significance. Gastrointest Endosc 28:1–5, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Granqvist S, Gabrielsson N, Sundelin P: Diminutive colonic polyps—clinical significance and management. Endoscopy 1:36–42, 1979Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryan ME, Parent K, Wyman JB, Nunez JF, Kirchner JP, Rhodes RA, Norfleet RG: Significance of diminutive colorectal polyps in 3281 flexible sigmoidoscopic examinations. Gastrointest Endosc 31:149, 1985 (abstract)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kronberg O, Hage E: Hyperplasia or neoplasia: Macroscopic versus microscopic appearance of colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 20:512–515, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chapius PH, Dent OF, Goulston KJ: Clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible sigmoidoscope. Dis Colon Rectum 25:669–672, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neale AV, Demers RY, Budev H, Scott RO: Physician accuracy in diagnosing colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 30:247–250, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Norfleet RG: The early detection of colorectal neoplasms. Post Grad Med 79:121–124, 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper HS, Patchefsky AS, Marks G: Adenomatous and carcinomatous changes within hyperplastic colonic epithelium. Dis Colon Rectum 22:152–156, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert G. Norfleet
    • 1
  • Michael E. Ryan
    • 1
  • J. B. Wyman
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of GastroenterologyMarshfield Medical CenterMarshfield

Personalised recommendations