Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 615–624 | Cite as

High-frequency induction by 5-azacytidine of proline independence in CHO-K1 cells

  • Morgan Harris
Article
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

Proline independence in CHO-K1 Chinese hamster cells has in previous studies been characterized as an auxotrophic gene mutation. In the absence of direct proof, an alternative model must be considered, based on suppression of proline synthesis by DNA methylation changes at one or more loci concerned. This concept receives strong support from the present study, in which we show that treatment of CHO-K1 cells with 5-azacytidine induces a 105–106 increase in background conversion to the proline-independent state. Revertants thus obtained, as well as those arising spontaneously or after treatment with ethyl methane sulfonate, are stable phenotypically in the presence or absence of proline. Proline independence in all variants examined was correlated with increased activity of pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase. Four of five variants induced with 5-azacytidine showed simultaneous increases in activity of ornithine aminotransferase as well. Our data suggest that epigenetic, rather than genetic changes, underlie the transitions between proline dependence and independence in CHO-K1 cells.

Keywords

Proline Alternative Model Strong Support Ornithine Genetic Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    Ham, R.G. (1963).Exp. Cell Res. 29:516–526.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kao, F., and Puck, T.T. (1967).Genetics 55:512–524.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kao, F., and Puck, T.T. (1974).Methods Cell Biol. 8:23–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siminovitch, L. (1976).Cell 7:1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Puck, T.T., and Kao, F. (1982).Annu. Rev. Genet. 16:225–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morrow, J. (1983).Eukaryotic Cell Genetics, (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meuth, M., L'Heureux-Huard, N., and Trudel, M. (1979).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:6605–6609.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kao, F., and Puck, T.T. (1968).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 60:1275–1281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baich, A. (1977).Somat. Cell Genet. 3:529–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kao, F., and Puck, T.T. (1969).J. Cell Physiol. 74:245–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor, S.M., and Jones, P.A. (1979).Cell 17:771–779.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, P.A., and Taylor, S.M. (1980).Cell 20:85–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Compere, S.J., and Palmiter, R.D. (1981).Cell 25:233–240.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clough, D.W., Kunkel, L.M., and Davidson, R.L. (1982).Science 216:70–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christy, B., and Scangos, G. (1982).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:6299–6303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, M. (1982).Cell 29:483–492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liteplo, R.G., Frost, P., and Kerbel, R.S. (1984).Exp. Cell Res. 150:499–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sugiyama, R.H., Arfin, S.M., and Harris, M. (1983).Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:1937–1942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris, M. (1984).Somat. Cell Mol. Genet. 10:275–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ivarie, R.D., and Morris, J.A. (1982).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:2967–2970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riggs, A.D., and Jones, P.A. (1983).Adv. Cancer Res. 40:1–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bradford, M. (1976).Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lodato, R.F., Smith, R.J., Valle, D., Phang, J.M., and Aoki, T.T. (1981).Metabolism 30:908–913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith, R.J., Downing, S.J., Phang, J.M., Lodato, R.F., and Aoki, T.T. (1980).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:5221–5225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, R.J., and Phang, J.M. (1979).J. Cell Physiol. 98:475–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eagle, H. (1965).J. Biol. Chem. 240:3944–3950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wasmuth, J.J., and Caskey, C.T. (1976).Cell 8:71–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Valle, D., Downing, S.J., Harris, S.C., and Phang, J.M. (1973).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 53:1130–1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Landolph, J.R., and Jones, P.A. (1982).Cancer Res. 42:817–823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilson, V.L., and Jones, P.A. (1983).Cell 32:239–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kastan, M.B., Gowans, B.J., and Lieberman, M.W. (1982).Cell 30:509–516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mohandas, T., Sparkes, R.S., and Shapiro, L.J. (1981).Science 211:393–396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graves, J.M. (1982).Exp. Cell Res. 141:99–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lester, S.C., Korn, N.J., and DeMars, R. (1982).Somat. Cell Genet. 8:265–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hors-Cayla, M.C., Heuertz, S., and Frezal, J. (1983).Somat. Cell Genet. 9:645–657.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morgan Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations