Advertisement

Journal of Religion and Health

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 198–206 | Cite as

Adult maturational processes and the facilitating environment

  • Marvin W. Acklin
Article

Abstract

The psychoanalytic theory of religion has been seriously limited in its development, largely owing to Freud's emphasis on religion's neurotic elements and an overemphasis on the infantile origins of religious development. This paper offers a conceptual framework and advances the thesis, based on contemporary psychoanalytic, developmental theory, that 1) Erikson's concept of epigenesis has applicability across the life span; 2) that beyond-the-self identity is constituent to human maturation and self-completion; 3) that successful adult maturation requires a mirroring-facilitating environment; and 4) that religious values, meanings, images, and communities play an essential role-as-elements of the facilitating environment of later life.

Keywords

Life Span Conceptual Framework Maturational Process Developmental Theory Psychoanalytic Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Erikson, E.,Identity and the Life-Cycle. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freud, S., “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality”. In Strachey, J., ed. and trans.,The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7). London, Hogarth Press, 1953, pp. 130–243.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Piaget, J.,Biology and Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erikson, E.,Childhood and Society. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1963.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federn, P.,Ego Psychology and the Psychoses. New York, Basic Books, 1952.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landis, G., “Ego Boundaries”,Psychological Issues, 1970,6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freud, A.; Nagera, H.; and Freud, E., “Metapsychological Assessment of the Adult Personality”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1965,29, 9; Gedo, J., and Goldberg, A.,Models of the Mind: A Psychoanalytic Theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973; Wolf, E., “On the Developmental Line of Self-Object Relations”. In Goldberg, A., ed.,Advances in Self Psychology, New York, International Universities Press, 1980, pp. 117–130.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Horowitz, M., “Body Image”,archives of General Psychiatry, 1966,14, 456–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisher, S., and Cleveland, S.,Body Image and Personality, Princeton, N.J., Van Nostrand, 1958; Fisher, S., “A Further Appraisal of the Body Boundary Concept”,J. Consulting Psychology, 1963,27, 62–74.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahler refers to the body boundary as the “rind of the body-self”. Mahler, M., “Perceptual De-differentiation and Psychotic Object Relationship”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1960,41, 548–553.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blatt, S., and Ritzler, B., “Thought Disorder and Boundary Disturbance in Psychosis”,J. Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974,42, 370–381; Blatt, S., and Wild, C.,Schizophrenia: A Developmental Analysis. New York, Academic Press, 1976; Quinlan, D., and Harrow, M. “Boundary Disturbances in Schizophrenia”,J. Abnormal Psychology, 1974,83, 533–541.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landis, “Ego Boundaries”,op. cit. Psychological Issues, 1970,6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sugarman, A.; Quinlan, D.; and Devenis, L., “Ego Boundary Disturbance in Anorexia Nervosa: Preliminary Findings”,J. Personality Assessment, 1982,46, 455–461.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kernberg, O.,Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York, Jason Aronson, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blatt, S.; Berman, W.; Bloom-Feshbach, S.; Sugarman, A.; Wilber, C.; and Kleber, H., “Psychological Assessment of Psychopathology in Opiate Addicts”,J. Nervous and Mental Disease, 1984,172, 156–165.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burnham, D.; Gladstone, A.; and Gibson, R.,Schizophrenia and the Need-Fear Dilemma. New York, International Universities Press, 1969; Kernberg,Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism, op. cit.;Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schulz, C., “The Contribution of the Concept of Self-Representation—Object Representation Differentiation to the Understanding of the Schizophrenias”. In Greenspan, S., and Pollock, G., eds.,The Course of Life: Psychoanalytic contributions toward Understanding Personality Development. Adelphi, Md., NIMH, 1980, pp. 543–570; Mahler, “Perceptual De-Differentiation and Psychotic Object Relationship”,; Searles. H.,The Nonhuman Environment in Normal Development and Schizophrenia. New York, International Universities Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kernberg,.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kohut, H.,The Analysis of the Self. New York, International Universities Press, 1971; Stolorow, R., “Toward a Functional Definition of Narcissism”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1975,56, 179–185; Kohut, H., and Wolf, E.S., “The Disorders of the Self and their Treatment”,International J. Psychoanalysis, 1978,59, 413–425.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blatt, S.J., and Lerner, H., “The Psychological Assessment of Object Representation”,J. Personality Assessment, 1983,47, 7–28; Quinlan and Harrow, “Boundary Disturbances in Schizophrenia”,.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winnicott, D., “The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship”, In Winnicott, D.,The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. New York, International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blos, P., “The Second Individuation Process of Adolescence”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1967,22, 162–186; Marcus, J., “The Experience of Separation-Individuation through the Course of Life: Adolescence and Maturity”,J. Amer. Psychoanalytic Association, 1973,21, 155–167; Tabin, J.K.,On the Way to Self: Ego and Early Oedipal Development. New York, Columbia University Press, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Erikson,Childhood and Society,.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freud; Nagera; and Freud, “Metapsychological Assessment of the Adult Personality”,.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    “Decentering” is a term borrowed from Piaget denoting a perspectival shift away from egocentric perception; where the domain of experience is increasingly contextual and objective, rather than self-centered. The decentering process optimally occurs at crucial transitions across the life-cycle. See Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B.,The Psychology of the Child. New York, Basic Books, 1969, p. 13.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kegan, R., “A Neo-Piagetian Approach to Object Relations”, In Lee, B., and Noam, G., eds.,Developmental Approaches to the Self. New York, Plenum Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gutmann, D., “Psychoanalysis and Aging: A Developmental View”. In Greenspan and Pollock, (eds.),.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brewer, E., “Everyday Life and Transcendence”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Religious Research Association, 1974.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Erikson, E., “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”. In Erikson, E.,Insight and Responsibility. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1964.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    —,The Life-Cycle Completed. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1982.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    —, “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”,.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    —,Childhood and Society,.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kernberg, O., “Boundaries and Structures in Love Relations”,J. Amer. Psychoanalytic Association, 1976,25, 81–114.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Erikson, “Human Strength and the Cycle of Generations”,.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    The nineteenth-century philosopher Frederich Schleiermacher understood religious experience as “the affective response to the relationships into which the whole of human nature is bound”. Niebuhr, R.,Schleiermacher on Christ and Religion. New York, Scribner's Son, 1964. From this perspective the fullest expression of religious development is mystical experience, that is, the felt identity with the whole. In this vein, Bellah defines religion as “the symbol system that serves to evoke...the felt-whole, that is, the totality that includes subject and object and provides the context in which life and action finally have meaning. ...” Bellah, R.,Beyond Belief. New York, Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Colarusso, C., and Nemiroff, R.,Adult Development: A New Dimension in Psychodynamic Theory and Practice. New York, Plenum Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Wolf, E., “On the Developmental Line of Self-Object Relations”, In Goldberg, ed..Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Campbell, J.,The Masks of God: Primitive Mythology. New York, Viking Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kohut, H., “Reflections onadvances in Self Psychology”. In Goldberg, ed.,.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
  42. 42.
    Lifton, R.,The Broken Connection. New York, Simon and Schuster, 1979.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hartmann, H.,Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation. New York, International Universities Press, 1939.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
  45. 45.
    Winnicott, D., “The Capacity to be Alone”. In Winnicott,. New York, International Universities Press, 1965, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Culture is the holding environment in an ultimate sense. Mediating structures bridge the gap between impersonal “megastructures” of society (e.g., the State) and the private life of the individual. These institutions—family, neighborhood, church or synagogue, and voluntary associations—function proximately as the facilitating matrix of development. Berger, P., and Neuhaus, R.J.,To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington D.C., American Enterprise Institute, 1977.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lasch, C.,The Culture of narcissism. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1979.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reich, A., “Pathological Forms of Self-Esteem Regulation”,The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1960,15, 214–232; Stolorow, R., and Lachmann, F., “Death Anxiety, Hypochondriasis, and Depersonalization”. InPsychoanalysis of Developmental Arrests. New York, International Universities Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Freud, S., “Obsessive actions and Religious Practices”. In Strachey, J., ed. and trans.,The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9). London, Hogarth Press, 1960, pp. 117–128;The Future of an Illusion. New York, W.W. Norton & Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gedo and Goldberg,. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Goldberg,.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Meissner, W.,Psychoanalysis and Religious Experience. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rizzuto, A.,The Birth of the Living God. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Buckley, P., “Mystical Experience and Schizophrenia”,Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1981,7, 516–521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Erikson, E., “Reflections on Dr. Borg's Life-cycle”,Daedalus, 1976,105, 1–28.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tansey, M., and Burke W., “Projective Identification and the Empathic Process”,Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 1985,1, 42–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institutes of Religion and Health 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marvin W. Acklin
    • 1
  1. 1.Loyola University of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations