Accomplishment of programs of investigations of resistance to brittle fracture in the member countries of the council for mutual economic aid

N. A. Makhutov et al., “Collaboration of the member countries of the Council for Mutual Economic Aid in the area of methods of calculation and tests for strength,” Zavod. Lab., No. 11, 1297 (1978).Google Scholar

Krehký, Iom materialu a Konstrutcy, 1–2 Dil., 11–13 Kvetna 1978, Vråtná dolina, CSSR.Google Scholar

V. Cymposium “Verformung und Bruch,” Sept. 4–6, 1979, Magdeburg, Part 1-2, Technische Hochschule “Otto von Guericke,” Magdeburg, DDR.Google Scholar

M. Brumovski, K. Kalna, N. A. Makhutov, and P. F. Koshelev, “Investigations of the brittle fracture resistance of materials and structures,” Mashinovedenie, No. 3, 64–68 (1980).Google Scholar

N. A. Makhutov, A. I. Tananov, P. F. Koshelev, and V. D. Zatsarinnyi, “The development of methods of determination of the characteristics of brittle fracture in problem 1–35 (22K) of the Council for Mutual Economic Aid,” Zavod. Lab., No. 7, 67–71 (1981).Google Scholar

V. Safta, A. Bernat, and T. Moisa, “The relationship between the characteristics of dynamic fracture toughness,”ibid., No. 7, 72–76 (1981).Google Scholar

T. Ortmann and E. Shik, “An investigation of the fields of displacements and deformations in dynamic loading,”ibid., No. 7, 76–77 (1981).Google Scholar

I. Kuchera, I. Talpa, and I. Benesh, “A pendulum impact tester with a maximum available energy of 10,000 J with a dynamometer,”ibid., No. 7, 82–85 (1981).Google Scholar

M. Gol'tsman and I. Man, “The relationship between the experimental and calculated fracture toughness,” Mashinovedenie, No. 5, 70–74 (1980).Google Scholar

P. Kasalitski, “The parameters of fracture in two limiting conditions,”ibid., No. 3, 69–74 (1980).Google Scholar

Method Instructions. Calculations and Tests for Strength in Machine Building. Methods of Mechanical Tests of Metals. Determination of the Characteristics of Fracture Toughness (Crack Resistance) in Static Loading. RD-50-260-81 [in Russian], Standartov, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar

V. A. Volkov, A. M. Orestov, and G. G. Karzov, “An experimental evaluation of the applicability of the method instructions for determination of the characteristics of crack resistance of low-strength steels,” in: Standardization of Methods of Crack Resistance Testing of Metals [in Russian], No. 2, Standartov, Moscow (1982), pp. 10–30.Google Scholar

Ya. Zemankova, “Certain questions of the dynamics of fracture,” Probl. Prochn., No. 1, 26–29 (1985).Google Scholar

V. Lishchinski and I. Podgora, “Providing safety in the designs of high pressure vessels and chemical equipment tanks from the point of view of brittle fracture,”ibid., 30–34.Google Scholar

R. Yanda and V. Mentl, “A comparison of methods of determination of slow crack growth,” ibid., 37–41.Google Scholar

T. Ortmann and E. Shik, “The problem of determination of the start of stable crack growth in fracture mechanics,”ibid., 34–36.Google Scholar