Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 265–278 | Cite as

Sensory reinforcement in the mentally handicapped and autistic child: A review

  • Glynis Murphy


Sensory reinforcement was first studied by learning theorists working with animals in the 1950s. Attempts to examine the phenomenon with children followed in the 1960s, and the studies demonstrated that sensory stimuli could act like any other reinforcers with normal young children. Similar work with the autistic and mentally handicapped child arose in relation to both the study of receptor development and more treatment-oriented research. It now seems that even profoundly handicapped children can learn to operate simple levers when reinforced by sensory stimuli, and some handicapped children have learned quite complex skills through sensory reinforcement. There also appears to be a close relationship between stereotyped behavior and sensory reinforcement. The clinical implications of the studies reviewed are discussed.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference notes

  1. 1.
    Friedlander, B. Z., & Knight, M. S.Systematic study of visual stimulus sensitivity in deaf-blind retarded children. Paper presented at the IVth International Conference on Deaf-Blind Children, Perkins School, Watertown, Massachusetts, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodall, E., & Corbett,J. Relationships between sensory stimulation and stereotyped behavior in severely retarded children. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, in press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, H. J. Personal communication, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogg,J. Sensory and social reinforcement of head-turning in a profoundly retarded multiply handicapped child. Unpublished report, Hester Adrian Research Centre, Manchester University, 1975.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Myrvang, G.Vibration as a stimulus and as a reinforcer with very profoundly retarded children. Unpublished report, 1973. (Obtainable from Niagara Therapy, Vauxhall Bridge Road, London.)Google Scholar


  1. 6.
    Antonitis, J. J., & Barnes, G. W. Group operant behavior: An extention of individual research methodology to real-life situation.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1961,98, 95–111.Google Scholar
  2. 7.
    Baer, D. M. Escape and avoidance response of pre-school children to two schedules of reinforcement withdrawal.Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 1960,3, 155–159.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Baer, D. M. Effect of withdrawal of positive reinforcement on an extinguishing response in young children.Child Development, 1961,32, 67–74.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Bailey, J., & Meyerson, L. Vibration as a reinforcer with a profoundly retarded child.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1969,2, 135–137.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Bailey, J., & Meyerson, L. Effect of vibratory stimulation on a retardate's self-injurious behaviour.Psychological Aspects of Disability, 1970,17 (3), 340.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Bartak, L., & Rutter, M. Differences between mentally retarded and normally intelligent autistic children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1976,6, 109–120.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Baumeister, A. A. Origins and control of stereotyped movements. In C. E. Meyers (Ed.),Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1978.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Baumeister, A. A., & Forehand, R. Stereotyped acts. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.),International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    Berkson, G. Abnormal stereotyped motor acts. In J. Zubin & H. F. Hunt (Eds.),Comparative psychopathology: Animal and human. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 15.
    Berkson, G., & Davenport, R. K. Stereotyped movements of mental defectives. I. Initial survey.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1962,66, 849–852.Google Scholar
  11. 16.
    Butler, R. A. Discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys to visual-exploration motivation.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1953,46, 95–98.Google Scholar
  12. 17.
    Butler, R. A., & Harlow, H. F. Persistence of visual exploration in monkeys.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1954,47, 258–263.Google Scholar
  13. 18.
    Butler, R. A., & Harlow, H. F. Discrimination learning and learning sets to visual exploration incentives.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957,57, 257–264.Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Byrne, D. Vibrator becomes a motivator for the multiply handicapped.Teaching and Training, 1979,17, 137–139.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    Byrne, D., & Stevens, C. Mentally handicapped children's responses to vibrotactile and other stimuli as evidence for the existence of a sensory hierarchy.Apex: Journal of the British Institute for Mental Handicap, 1980,8, 96–98.Google Scholar
  16. 21.
    Campbell, H. J. Peripheral self-stimulation as a reward in fish, reptile and mammal.Physiology and Behavior, 1971,8, 637–640.Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    Clarke, A. M., & Clarke, A. D. B.Mental deficiency: The Changing outlook. London: Methuen, 1974. Ch. 13.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    Clarke, A. M., & Clarke, A. D. B.Early experience: Myth and evidence. London: Open Books, 1976. Section II.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    Fineman, K. R. Shaping and increasing verbalization in an autistic child in response to visualcolor stimulation.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968,27, 1071–1074.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    Frankel, F., Freeman, B. J., Ritvo, E., Chikami, B., & Carr, E. Effects of frequency of photic stimulation upon autistic and retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976,81, 32–40.Google Scholar
  21. 26.
    Frankel, F., Freeman, B. J., Ritvo, E., & Pardo, R. The effect of environmental stimulation upon the stereotyped behavior of autistic children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 1978,8, 389–394.Google Scholar
  22. 27.
    Girdner, J. B. An experimental analysis of the behavioral effects of a perceptual consequence unrelated to organic drive states.American Psychologist, 1953,8, 345–355.Google Scholar
  23. 28.
    Hemsley, R., & Carr, J. Ways of increasing behaviour-Reinforcement. In W. Yule & J. Carr, (Eds.),Behaviour modification for the mentally handicapped. London: Croon Helm, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    Hollis, J. Analysis of rocking behavior. In C. E. Meyers (Ed.),Quality of life in severely and profoundly mentally retarded people: Research foundations for improvement. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    Hubel, D. H., & Weisel, T. N. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye-closure in kittens.Journal of Physiology, 1970,206, 419–436.Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    Hutt, C. Exploration and play in children. In P. A. Jewell & C. Loizos (Eds.),Play, exploration, and territory in mammals. London: Academic Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Hutt, C. Temporal effects on response decrement and stimulus satiation in exploration.British Journal of Psychology, 1967,58, 65–373.Google Scholar
  28. 33.
    Hutt, C., & Hutt, S. Effects of environmental complexity on stereotyped behaviour of children.Animal Behaviour, 1965,13, 1–4.Google Scholar
  29. 34.
    Johnson, D., Firth, H., & Davey, G. C. L. Vibration and praise as reinforcers for mentally handicapped people.Mental Retardation, 1978,16, 339–342.Google Scholar
  30. 35.
    Jones, C. The uses of mechanical vibration with the severely mentally handicapped. Part I: Clinical effects. Part II: Behavioral effects.Apex: Journal of the British Institute of Mental Handicap, 1980,7, 81–82; 112–114.Google Scholar
  31. 36.
    Kaufman, M. E., & Levitt, H. A study of three stereotyped behaviors in institutionalized mental defectives.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1965,69, 467–473.Google Scholar
  32. 37.
    Kish, G. B. Learning when onset of illumination is used as a reinforcing stimulus.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 1955,48, 261–264.Google Scholar
  33. 38.
    Kish, G. B. Sensory reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.),Operant behavior: Areas of research of application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. 39.
    Meyerson, L., Kerr, N., & Michael, J. Behavior modification in rehabilitation. In S. Bijou & D. Baer (Eds.),Child development: Readings in experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  35. 40.
    Ohwaki, S., Brahlek, J. A., & Stayton, S. E. Preference for vibratory and visual stimulation in mentally retarded children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973,77, 733–736.Google Scholar
  36. 41.
    Ohwaki, S., & Stayton, S. E. Preference by the retarded for vibratory and visual stimulation as a function of mental age and psychotic reaction.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1976,85, 516–522.Google Scholar
  37. 42.
    Rehagen, N. J., & Thelen, M. H. Vibration as positive reinforcement for retarded children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1972,80, 162–167.Google Scholar
  38. 43.
    Remington, R. F., Foxen, T., & Hogg, J. Auditory reinforcement in profoundly retarded multiply-handicapped children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977,82, 299–304.Google Scholar
  39. 44.
    Rheingold, H. L., Stanley, W. C., & Doyle, G. A. Visual and auditory reinforcement of a manipulatory response in the young child.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1964,1, 316–326.Google Scholar
  40. 45.
    Rice, H. K., & McDaniel, M. W. Operant behaviour in vegetative patients.Psychological Record, 1966,16, 279–281.Google Scholar
  41. 46.
    Rice, H. K., McDaniel, M. W., Stallings, V. D., & Gatz, M. J. Operant behaviour in vegetative patients, II.Psychological Record, 1967,17, 449–460.Google Scholar
  42. 47.
    Rincover, A. Sensory extinction: A procedure for eliminating self-stimulatory behavior in developmentally disabled children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1978,6, 299–310.Google Scholar
  43. 48.
    Rincover, A., Cook, R., Peoples, A., & Packard, D. Sensory extinction and sensory reinforce-principles for programming multiple adaptive behavior change.Journal of Applied Analysis, 1979,12, 221–233.Google Scholar
  44. 49.
    Rincover, A., Newson, C. D., Lovaas, O. I., & Koegel, R. L. Some motivational properties of sensory reinforcement with psychotic children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,24, 312–323.Google Scholar
  45. 50.
    Ryan, J., & Thomas, F.The politics of mental handicap. Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1980.Google Scholar
  46. 51.
    Schaeffer, H. H. Vibration as a reinforcer for infant children.Journal of Experimental Analytical Behaviour, 1960,3, 160.Google Scholar
  47. 52.
    Schopler, E. Visual versus tactual receptor preferences in normal and schizophrenic children.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966,71, 108–114.Google Scholar
  48. 53.
    Siqueland, E. R. Reinforcement patterns and extinction in human newborns.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1968,6, 431–442.Google Scholar
  49. 54.
    Stevenson, H. W., & Knights, R. M. Effect of visual reinforcement on the performance of normal and retarded children.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1961,13, 119–126.Google Scholar
  50. 55.
    Stevenson, H. W., & Odom, R. D. Effects of pre-training on the reinforcing value of visual stimuli.Child Development, 1961,32, 739–744.Google Scholar
  51. 56.
    Williams, C.An observational study of mannerisms in the deaf-blind child. Unpublished doc-doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, 1975.Google Scholar
  52. 57.
    Williams, C. Strategies of intervention with the profoundly retarded visually-handicapped child: A brief report of a study of stereotypy. Division of Education and Child Psychology, British Psychological Society: Occasional Papers II, No. II, 1978, pp. 68–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glynis Murphy
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychiatryLondon

Personalised recommendations