Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 48–63 | Cite as

Biodiversity and modern crop varieties: Sharpening the debate

  • Robert Tripp


Debates about the relationship between agricultural technology and the conservation of crop genetic diversity are often hampered by unclear vocabulary and imprecise data. Various interpretations of the terms “modern variety,” “local variety,” “hybrid,” and “green revolution” are first explored, and then evidence is examined regarding the effect of modern varieties on intra- and intercrop diversity, risk, input use, and farmer decision-making. The objective is to urge a more reasoned debate about the future of plant genetic resources.


Genetic Diversity Veterinary Medicine Local Variety Genetic Resource Agricultural Economic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altieri, M. 1987.Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. and P. Hazell. 1989. “Synthesis and Needs in Agricultural Research and Policy.” InVariability in Grain Yields: Implications for Agricultural Research and Policy in Developing Countries, eds. J. Anderson and P. Hazell. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. and P. Hazell. 1994. “Risk Considerations in the Design and Transfer of Agricultural Technology.” InAgricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community, ed. J. Anderson. Wallingford: CAB.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, J. A. 1982. “Technology and Ecology: Implication for Innovation Research in Peasant Agriculture.”Rural Sociology 47 (2): 234–250.Google Scholar
  5. Bellon, M. R. and S. B. Brush. 1994. “Keepers of Maize in Chiapas, Mexico.”Economic Botany 48 (2): 196–209.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, T., A. Bjoernstad, C. Fowler, and T. Kroeppa. 1991. “Technology Options and the Gene Struggle.”NORAGRIC Occasional Papers Series C.; Development and Environment No. 8. As: Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, S. 1993.No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison, WI: U. Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brass, T. 1994. “Introduction: The New Farmers' Movements in India.”Journal of Peasant Studies 21: 3–26.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, F. 1986.The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, J. and D. Byerlee. 1991. “The Rate of Crop Varietal Replacement on Farms: Measures and Empirical Results for Wheat.”Plant Varieties and Seeds 4: 99–106.Google Scholar
  11. Browne, W., J. Skees, L. Swanson, P. Thompson, and L. Unnevehr. 1992.Sacred Cows and Hot Potatoes: Agrarian Myths in Agricultural Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Brush, S. 1991. “A Farmer-Based Approach to Conserving Crop Germplasm.”Economic Botany 45 (2): 153–165.Google Scholar
  13. Brush, S. 1992. “Reconsidering the Green Revolution: Diversity and Stability in Cradle Areas of Crop Domestication.”Human Ecology 20: 145–167.Google Scholar
  14. Brush, S. 1993. “In Situ Conservation of Landraces in Centers of Crop Diversity.” Paper presented for the Symposium on Global Implications of Germplasm Conservation and Utilization at the 85th Annual Meetings of the American Society of Agronomy, Cincinnati, 8 November, 1993.Google Scholar
  15. Byerlee, D. 1994.Modern Varieties, Productivity, and Sustainability: Recent Experience and Emerging Challenges. Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  16. Byerlee, D. and M. Lopez-Pereira. 1994. “Technical Change in Maize Production: A Global Perspective.” CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 94-02. Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  17. Ceccarelli, S. 1989. “Wide Adaptation: How Wide?”Euphytica 40: 197–205.Google Scholar
  18. Ceccarelli, S. 1994. “Breeding for Sustainable Development of Marginal Environments.” International Course on Applied Plant Breeding, International Agricultural Centre, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  19. Chandler, R. 1973. “The Scientific Basis for the Increased Yield Capacity of Rice and Wheat, and Its Present and Potential Impact on Food Production in the Developing Countries.” InFood, Population, and Employment: The Impact of the Green Revolution, eds. T. Poleman and D. Freebairn. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Chibnik, M. 1981. “Small Farmer Risk Aversion: Peasant Reality or Policymakers' Rationalization?”Culture and Agriculture. 10: 1–5.Google Scholar
  21. CIMMYT. 1994.1994 CIMMYT World Maize Facts and Trends. Mexico D.F.: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  22. Clawson D. L. and D. R. Hoy. 1979. “Nealtican, Mexico: A Peasant Community that Rejected the Green Revolution.”American Journal of Economics and Sociology 38 (4): 371–387.Google Scholar
  23. Cleveland, D., D. Soleri, and S. Smith. 1994. “Do Folk Crop Varieties Have a Role in Sustainable Agriculture?”BioScience 44: 740–751.Google Scholar
  24. Cowen, M. and R. Shenton. 1996.Doctrines of Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cox, T., J. Murphy, and M. Goodman. 1988. “The Contribution of Exotic Germplasm to American Agriculture.” InSeeds and Sovereignty ed. J. Kloppenburg. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Crucible Group. 1994.People, Plants, and Patents. Ottawa: IDRC.Google Scholar
  27. Cummings, R. 1978. “Agricultural Change in Vietnam's Floating Rice Region.”Human Organization 37: 235–245.Google Scholar
  28. de Boef, W., K. Amanor, K. Wellard, with A. Bebbington. 1993.Cultivating Knowledge. Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  29. de Jager, A. 1991. “Towards Self-Experimenting Village Groups.” InJoining Farmers' Experiments, eds. B. Haverkort, J. van den Kamp, and A. Waters-Bayer. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Dempsey, G. 1992. “Diversity and Crop Defense: The Roles of Farmer and Breeder.”Biotechnology and Development Monitor 13: 13–15.Google Scholar
  31. den Biggelaar, C. 1994. “Differentiating the Nature of Agroforestry Systems and Agroforestry Knowledge among Farmers in Southern Rwanda.”Culture and Agriculture 50: 5–11.Google Scholar
  32. Dennis, J. V. Jr. 1987. “Farmer Management of Rice Diversity in Northern Thailand.” Ph.D. Thesis. USA: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  33. Dewey, K. 1981. “Nutritional Consequences of the Transformation From Subsistence to Commercial Agriculture in Tabasco, Mexico.”Human Ecology 9: 151–187.Google Scholar
  34. Eisenstadt, S. 1976. “The Changing Vision of Modernization and Development.” InCommunication and Change eds. W. Schramm and D. Lerner. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  35. Francis, C. 1986.Multiple Cropping Systems. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Francks, P. 1984.Technology and Agricultural Development in Pre-War Japan. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Frankel, O. 1988. “Genetic Resources: Evolutionary and Social Responsibilities.” InSeeds and Sovereignty ed. J. Kloppenburg. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Frankena, W. 1963.Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Freebairn, D. 1995. “Did the Green Revolution Concentrate Incomes? A Quantitative Study of Research Reports.”World Development 23: 265–279.Google Scholar
  40. Gebrekidan, B. and Y. Kebede. 1979. “The Traditional Culture and Yield Potentials of the Ethiopian High Lysine Sorghums.”Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science 1: 29–40.Google Scholar
  41. Goody, J. 1980. “Rice-burning and the Green Revolution in Northern Ghana.”Journal of Development Studies 16: 136–155.Google Scholar
  42. Groosman, T., A. Linnemann, and H. Wierema. 1991.Seed Industry Development in a North-South Perspective. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Pudoc.Google Scholar
  43. Haugerud, A. and M. Collinson. 1990. “Plants, Genes and People: Improving the Relevance of Plant Breeding in Africa.”Experimental Agriculture 26: 341–362.Google Scholar
  44. Hazell, P. and C. Ramasamy. 1991.The Green Revolution Reconsidered: The Impact of High Yielding Rice Varieties in South India. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jefferson, R. 1994. “Apomixis: A Social Revolution for Agriculture?”Biotechnology and Development Monitor 19: 14–16.Google Scholar
  46. Jennings, P. and J. Cock. 1977. “Centres of Origin of Crops and Their Productivity.”Economic Botany 31: 51–54.Google Scholar
  47. Keystone Center. 1991. “Global Initiative for the Security and Sustainable Use of Plant Genetic Resources: Final Consensus Report of the Keystone International Dialogue Series on Plant Genetic Resources, Third Plenary Session, 31 May – 4 June, 1991, Oslo, Norway.” Keystone, Colorado: The Keystone Center.Google Scholar
  48. Kirkby, R. A. 1990. “The Ecology of Traditional Agroecosystems in Africa.” InAgroecology and Small Farm Development, eds. M. A. Altieri and S. B. Hecht. Boston: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kloppenburg, Jr., J. 1988.First The Seed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kuhn, T. 1962.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lacy, W. 1994. “Biodiversity, Cultural Diversity, and Food Equity.”Agriculture and Human Values. XI (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
  52. Lanjouw, P. and N. Stern. 1993. “Agricultural Change and Inequality in Palanpur, 1957–84.” InThe Economics of Rural Organization: Theory, Practice, and Policy, ed. K. Hoff, A. Braverman, and J. Stiglitz. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Levins, R. and R. Lewontin. 1985.The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Lightfoot, C., K. Dear, and R. Mead. 1987. “Intercropping Sorghum with Cowpea in Dryland Farming Systems in Botswana. II. Comparative Stability of Alternative Cropping Systems.”Experimental Agriculture 23: 435–442.Google Scholar
  55. Lipton, M. 1977.Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lipton M. and R. Longhurst. 1989.New Seeds and Poor People. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  57. Marshall, D. 1977. “The Advantages and Hazards of Genetic Homogeneity.” InThe Genetic Basis of Epidemics in Agriculture, ed. P. Day. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  58. Maurya, D. M. 1989. “The Innovative Approach of Indian Farmers.” InFarmer First. Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, eds. R. Chambers, A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  59. McCloskey, D. 1994.Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mooney, P. 1992. “Towards a Folk Revolution.” InGrowing Diversity: Genetic Resources and Local Food Security, eds. D. Cooper, R Vellve, and H. Hobbelink. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Moore, H. and M. Vaughan. 1994.Cutting Down Trees. Gender, Nutrition, and Agricultural Change in the Northern Province of Zambia, 1890–1990. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
  62. NRC (National Research Council). 1992.Conserving Biodiversity. A Research Agenda for Development Agencies. Report of a Panel of the Board on Science and Technology for International Development. US National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  63. Osborn, T. 1992.Guide for Developing PVO/PC Seed Activities: The On-Farm Seed Project. Morrilton, Arkansas: Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.Google Scholar
  64. Otsuka, K., F. Gascon, and S. Asano. 1994. “‘Secondgeneration’ MVs and the Evolution of the Green Revolution: The Case of Central Luzon, 1966–90.”Agricultural Economics 10: 283–295.Google Scholar
  65. Pandey, B. 1994. “Hybrid Seed Controversy in India.”Biotechnology and Development Monitor 19: 9–11.Google Scholar
  66. Peet, R. 1975. “Relative Diversity Indices.”Ecology 56: 496–498.Google Scholar
  67. Pingali, P. 1994. “Technological Prospects for Reversing the Declining Trend in Asia's Rice Productivity.” InAgricultural Technology: Policy Issues for the International Community, ed. J. Anderson. Wallingford: CAB.Google Scholar
  68. Pray, C., S. Ribeiro, R. Mueller, and P. Rao. 1991. “Private Research and Public Benefit: The Private Seed Industry for Sorghum and Pearl Millet in India.”Research Policy 20: 315–324.Google Scholar
  69. Pretty, J. 1995.Regenerating Agriculture. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  70. Pushpamma, P., V. Vimala, and D. Prameela. 1981. “Consumption Patterns of Food Legumes in Andhra Pradesh, South India.”Ecology of Food and Nutrition 10: 179–185.Google Scholar
  71. Richards, P. 1986.Coping with Hunger: Hazard and Experiment in an African Rice Farming System. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  72. Rigg, J. 1989. “The New Rice Technology and Agrarian Change: Guilt by Association?”Progress in Human Geography 13: 374–399.Google Scholar
  73. Rogers, E. M. 1962.Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rola, A. and P. Pingali. 1993.Pesticides, Rice Productivity, and Farmers' Health. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  75. Rolston, H. 1988.Environmental Ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Ross, A. 1994.The Chicago Gangster Theory of Life: Nature's Debt to Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  77. Ryan, J. and M. Asokan. 1977. “Effect of Green Revolution in Wheat on Production of Pulses and Nutrients in India.” ICRISAT Economics Program Occasional Paper 18. Hyderabad: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
  78. Sachs, W. (ed.) 1992.The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  79. Salazar, R. 1992. “Community Plant Genetic Resources Management: Experiences in Southeast Asia.” InGrowing Diversity: Genetic Resources and Local Food Security, eds. D. Cooper, R. Vellve, and H. Hobbelink. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  80. Scobie, G, and R. Posada. 1978. “The Impact of Technical Change on Income Distribution: The Case of Rice in Colombia.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics 60: 85–92.Google Scholar
  81. Sen, S. 1975.Reaping the Green Revolution: Food and Jobs for All. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  82. Shiva, V. 1988.Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  83. Shiva, V. 1991. “The Green Revolution in the Punjab.”The Ecologist 21: 57–60.Google Scholar
  84. Shiva, V. 1993.Monocultures of the Mind. Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  85. Simmonds, N. 1979.Principles of Crop Improvement. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  86. Simmonds, N. 1991. “Selection for Local Adaptation in a Plant Breeding Programme.”Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 363–367.Google Scholar
  87. Smale, M. with Z. Kaunda, H. Makina, M. Mkandawire, M. Msowoya, D. Mwale, and P. Heisey. 1991. “Chimanga Cha Makolo, Hybrids, and Composites: An Analysis of Farmers' Adoption of Maize Technology in Malawi, 1988–91.” CIMMYT Economics Working Paper 91/04. Mexico: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  88. Souza, E., P. Fox, D. Byerlee, and B. Skovmand. 1994. “Spring Wheat Diversity in Irrigated Areas of Two Developing Countries.”Crop Science 34: 774–783.Google Scholar
  89. Sperling, L., M. E. Loevinsohn, and B. Ntambovura. 1993. “Rethinking the Farmer's Role in Plant Breeding: Local Bean Experts and On-Station Selection in Rwanda.”Experimental Agriculture 29: 509–519.Google Scholar
  90. Spitz, P. 1987. “The Green Revolution Re-examined in India.” InThe Green Revolution Revisited, ed. B. Glaeser. London: Allen Unwin.Google Scholar
  91. Thompson, M. 1993. “Good Science for Public Policy.”Journal of International Development 5: 669–679.Google Scholar
  92. Tribe, D. 1994.Feeding and Greening the World: The Role of International Agricultural Research. Wallingford: CAB.Google Scholar
  93. Vogel, J. 1994.Genes For Sale: Privatization as a Conservation Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wilken, G. 1987.Good Farmers: Traditional Agricultural Resource Management in Mexico and Central America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  95. Wilkes, G. 1994. “Germplasm Conservation and Agriculture.” InBiodiversity and Landscapes, eds. K. C. Kim and R. Weaver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wilson, E. 1992.The Diversity of Life. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  97. Woolley, J. and M. Smith. 1986. “Maize Plant Types Suitable for Present and Possible Bean Relay Systems in Central America.”Field Crops Research 15: 3–16.Google Scholar
  98. Yapa, L. 1993. “What Are Improved Seeds? An Epistemology of the Green Revolution.”Economic Geography 69: 254–273.Google Scholar
  99. Zeigler, R. 1986. “Application of a Systems Approach in a Commodity Research Programme: Evaluating Burundi Highland Maize.”Experimental Agriculture 22: 319–328.Google Scholar
  100. Zimmerer, K. S. 1991a. “Managing Diversity in Potato and Maize Fields of the Peruvian Andes.”Journal of Ethnobiology 11(1): 23–49.Google Scholar
  101. Zimmerer, K. S. 1991b. “Labor Shortages and Crop Diversity in the Southern Peruvian Sierra.”Geographical Review 81(4): 414–432.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Tripp

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations