Agriculture and Human Values

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 2–9 | Cite as

Traditional knowledge and rationale for weaver ant husbandry in the Mekong delta of Vietnam

  • Marco S. Barzman
  • Nick J. Mills
  • Nguyen Thi Thu Cuc


The weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), has long been known as perhaps the first example of human manipulation of a natural predator population to enhance the natural biological control of insect pests. The practice of ant husbandry in Vietnamese citrus orchards and the knowledge associated with the use of weaver ants in the Mekong delta are described. In contrast to other regions of Asia, where weaver ants are noted for their role in the protection of citrus from insect damage, citrus farmers in the Mekong delta explain the benefits of ant husbandry in terms of an improvement in fruit quality, likened to the influence of fertilizers, that occurs in direct response to excretory products deposited by the weaver ants as they patrol the fruit. A series of tests, carried out in 1993–94, rated the external shine, sweetness, juiciness, and overall appeal, as characteristics of fruit quality, for paired comparisons of sweet orange, mandarin, and pummelo fruit that had been grown in the presence of weaver ants or from which ants had been excluded. The tests indicate a strong influence of the presence of the weaver ant on external shine, juiciness, and overall appeal for each of the citrus fruits, but particularly for mandarin. The significance of these results and ant husbandry practices in the Mekong delta are discussed in relation to the development of citrus production in Vietnam.


Insect Pest Fruit Quality Traditional Knowledge Citrus Fruit Sweet Orange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altieri, M. A. and C. R. Carroll. “Why study traditional agriculture?” InAgroecology, eds. C. R. Carroll, J. H. Vandermeer, and P. M. Rosset. New York: McGraw Hill, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, R. “Investment priorities for sustaining agricultural growth and rural development in Vietnam.”FAO Vietnam Mission Report (1993) no. TCP/VIE/2252.Google Scholar
  3. Beugnon, G. and A. Dejean. “Adaptive properties of the chemical trail system of the African weaver antOecophylla longinoda Latreille (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Formicinae).”Insectes Sociaux, 39 (1992): 341–346.Google Scholar
  4. Chareornsom, K. and S. Dittaporn. 1990.Natural Enemies of Fruit Pests and the Augmentation of Natural Enemies (in Thai). Bangkok: Kasetsart University Bangkok and Department of Agricultural Extension.Google Scholar
  5. Dejean, A. Laboratoire d'Ethologie Expérmentale et Comparé, Universitité Paris-Nord, Paris, France. Personeal communications, November 25, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1988. Report on agricultural and food production in Vietnam.Google Scholar
  7. Garcia, C. E. “The citrus rind borer and its control.”Philippine Journal of Agriculture, 10 (1939): 89–92.Google Scholar
  8. Holldobler, B. and E. O. Wilson. 1990.The Ants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Huang, H. T. and Y. Pei. “The ancient cultured citrus ant, a tropical ant is used to control insect pests in southern China.”Bioscience, 37 (1987): 665–671.Google Scholar
  10. Kalshoven, L. G. E. 1981.Pests of Indonesia. Djakarta: P. T. Ichtiar Baru-Van Hoeve.Google Scholar
  11. Keegans, S. J., J. Billen, and E. D. Morgan. “Volatile secretions of the green tree antOecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).”Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B, Comparative Biochemistry, 100 (1991): 681–685.Google Scholar
  12. Khoo, K. C., P. A. C. Ooi, and H. C. Tuck. 1991.Crop Pests and their Management in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Tropical Press Sdn. Bhd.Google Scholar
  13. Leela David, A. “Notes on the biology and habits of the red tree ant,Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius).”The Madras Agricultural Journal, 48 (1961): 54–57.Google Scholar
  14. Leston, D. “The ant mosaic-tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases.”Pest Articles and News Summaries, 19 (1973): 311–341.Google Scholar
  15. Letourneau, D. K. “Code of ant-plant mutualism broken by parasite.”Science, 248 (1990): 215–217.Google Scholar
  16. Peerzada, N., T. Pakkiyaretnam, and S. Renaud. “Volatile constituents of the green antOecophylla smaragdina.”Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 54 (1990): 3335–3336.Google Scholar
  17. Pei, Y., S. Chen, and J. S. Zheng. “The yellow citrus ant in Fujian.” (in Chinese),Natural Enemies of Insects, 5 (1983): 59–60.Google Scholar
  18. Pu Zhe Long. “Propagation and use of ants to control pests.” (in Chinese) inPrinciples and Methods of Biological Control of Pests, ed. Pu Zhe Long. Zhong Shan: Zhong Shan University Science Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  19. Rajput, C. B. S. and R. S. Haribabu. 1985.Citriculture. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Ratanadaros, A. “Characterization ofCitrus in Thailand.”Newsletter, IBPGR Regional Committee for Southeast Asia, Special Issue no. 93 (1987).Google Scholar
  21. Roistacher, C. N. and M. Bar-Joseph. “Aphid transmission of citrus tristeza virus: a review.”Phytophylactica 19 (1987): 163–167.Google Scholar
  22. Siegel, S. 1956.Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Thrupp, L. A. “Legitimizing local knowledge: from displacement to empowerment for third world people.”Agriculture and Human Values, 6, 3 (Summer, 1989): 13–24.Google Scholar
  24. Vo Tong Xuan. University of Can Tho, Can Tho, Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Personal communication, February 20, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Warren, D. M. “Using indigenous knowledge in agricultural development.”World Bank Discussion Papers, no. 127 (1991).Google Scholar
  26. Winer, B. J. 1971.Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco S. Barzman
  • Nick J. Mills
  • Nguyen Thi Thu Cuc

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations