Strength of Materials

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 194–199 | Cite as

Formation of chipping fragments on a steel surface in contact impact

  • Yu. V. Kolesnikov
  • E. M. Morozov
  • G. M. Sorokin
Scientific-Technical Section
  • 22 Downloads

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The not earlier noted fact of formation in contact impact on the surface of hardened steel of prismatic and segment chipping fragments was established experimentally. The first are formed in intersection of median cracks and the second in intersection of median and circular cracks.

     
  2. 2.

    Simple models based on criteria of fracture mechanics and low-cycle fatigue making it possible to analyze the forms of failure considered are proposed. Using the calculation relationships it is possible to determine the order of magnitude of the separate fragment.

     

Keywords

Fatigue Simple Model Fracture Mechanic Steel Surface Circular Crack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    V. Z. Parton and E. M. Morozov, Elastoplastic Fracture Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. M. Morozov and Ya. B. Fridman, “The trajectories of brittle fracture cracks as geodesic lines on the surface of the body”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,139, No. 1, 87–90 (1961).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. S. Solntsev and E. M. Morozov, The Fracture of Glass [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1978).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. R. Lawn and T. R. Wilshaw, “Indentation fracture: principles and application”, J. Mater. Sci.,10, No. 6, 1049–1081 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. G. Pisarenko, S. P. Kovalev, and V. M. Chushko, “The fracture toughness of a piezoelectirc ceramic”, Probl. Prochn., No. 12, 29–33 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. N. Vinogradov, G. M. Sorokin, and A. Yu. Albagachiev, Wear in Impact [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. V. Ryzhov, Yu. V. Kolesnikov, and A. G. Suslov, The Contact of Hard Bodies under Static and Dynamic Loads [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Finnie, “Erosion of surface by solid particles”, Wear, No. 2, 87–103 (1960).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. B. Marshall, B. R. Lawn, and A. G. Evans, “Elastoplastic indentation damage in ceramics: the lateral crack system”, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,65, No. 10, 361–366 (1982).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. A. Galanov and O. N. Grigor'ev, “The deformation and fracture of superhard materials in concentrated loading”, Probl. Prochn., No. 10, 36–42 (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. M. Sorokin, “Basic features of impact-abrasive wear of steels and alloys”, Trenie Iznos,3, No. 5, 773–779 (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. M. Morozov, “Two-criteria approaches in fracture mechanics”, Probl. Prochn., No. 10, 103–108 (1985).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu. V. Kolesnikov, “The kinetics of deformation of materials in pulsating contact loading with different cyclic recurrences”, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Mashinostr., No. 10, 9–18 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A B. Ankudinov, N. D. Sobolev, and V. I. Egorov, “Evaluation of life in low-cycle fatigue,” in: The Strength of Materials and Structural Elements of Atomic Reactors. Proceedings of the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute [in Russian], Moscow (1985), pp. 91–95.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu. G. Matvienko, “The kinetics of damage in contact fatigue”, Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 3, 66–68 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. V. Kolesnikov
  • E. M. Morozov
  • G. M. Sorokin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations