The Soviet Journal of Atomic Energy

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 1027–1032 | Cite as

The definition of the roentgen in the “Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Units. 1953”

  • S. N. Ardashnikov
  • N. S. Chetverikov


The contradictions found in the definitions of the roentgen as a unit of X- and γ-radiation are expounded and criticized. The definition accepted in the USSR of the roentgen as the unit of physical dose\((\frac{{OST}}{{VKS}}7623)\) differs from those in the International Recommendations and of the Congresses (Stockholm 1928 and Chicago 1937), where the roentgen is considered as the unit of dose, and not the physical dose. This has occasioned much confusion as to the physical content of the phenomena which the roentgen was intended to measure. An attempt was made in the 1953 Recommendations to resolve these difficulties, but this cannot be considered successful. The basic fault in the definition of the roentgen, which is that it “measures the amount of X- or γ-radiation” is retained. The definition given in the Recommendations of the amount of radiation as the time-integral of the intensity leads to the concept of the amount of radiation as being a flux density at a point, i.e., it adds a third variant to the dose concept, which further confuses the issue. The paper presents the requirements which the definitions of the basic units for measuring ionizing radiations — the roentgen and its equivalents — must satisfy.


Incident Energy International Commission Physical Content State Tech Physical Dose 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. [1]
    D. E. Lea, Action of radiations on living cells, Cambridge, 1946, p. 6–7.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. A. Sena. Units for measuring physical quantities. State Tech. Press, 1948, p. 127.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. V. Beklemishev. Dimensions and inits of physical quantities. State Tech. Press, 1954, p, 235.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. K. Aglintsev. Dosimetry of ionizing radiations. State Medical Press, 1950, p. 213.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. K. Aglintsev. Fundamentals of ionizing radiation dosimetry. State Medical Press, 1954, p. 107.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Ya. L. Shekhtman. Dosimetry of radiations from radioisotopes. (Symposium on“Labelled atom methods in biology”, ed. A. M. Kuzin) Izd. MGU, 1955, p. 221.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ya. L. Shekhtman, Trans. Inst. Biophysics AN SSSR,1, 122–135, 1955.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. B. Keirim-Markus and U. Ya. Margulis. A brief outline of the physical bases of radiology. (Symp. “Biological actions of radiations and the pathology of radiation sickness”). State Med. Press, 1954, pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    I. V. Poroikov. Measurement of X-rays. State Tech. Press, 1950, p. 124.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. V. Mayneord, Acta of the International Union against Cancer II, No. 3, 271 (1937).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Units (London, 1950), Radiology 56, No. 1. 117–119 (1951).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Units (Revised at the Seventh International Congress of Radiology, Copenhagen, 1953), Radiology 62. No. 1, 106–109 (1954).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    L. D. Marinelli and L. S. Taylor. Radiation Biology, Ed. by A. Hollaender 1, 1954, p. 145.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Somerwil, Brit. J. Radiol. 27, No. 319, 412 (1954).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    L. H. Gray, Brit. J. Radiol. 29, No. 343, 355 (1956).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. F. Yudin, Measurement technique, 1, 18–19, 1956.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. F. Yudin, Measurement technique, 1, 31–36, 1956.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    P. M. Tikhodeev, Measurement technique, 1, 15, 1956.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    I. V. Poroikov, Measurement technique, 1, 20–23, 1956.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    E. H. Quimby and G. C. Laurence, Radiology 35, No. 2, 138–139 (1940).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    G. V. Gorshkov. The γ-rays from radioactive substances. Izd. LGU, 1956, p. 128.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. E. Roberts, Brit. J. Radiol. 28, No. 336, 682 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau, Inc. 1957

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Ardashnikov
  • N. S. Chetverikov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations