Genetica

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 315–324 | Cite as

Aspects of fruit and seed development which affect the breeding behaviour ofRubus species

  • D. L. Jennings
Article

Abstract

An attempt is made to collate studies on pollen germination, early and late fruit and seed development, seedling emergence and gene linkage, and to show how each of these affects the breeding behaviour of certainRubus species.

Keywords

Gene Linkage Seed Development Seedling Emergence Pollen Germination Breeding Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daubeny, H. A., P. C. Crandall &G. W. Eaton (1967). Crumbliness in the red raspherry with special reference to the Sumner variety.Horticulture 91: 224–30.Google Scholar
  2. Jennings, D. L. (1967a). Balanced lethals and polymorphism in Rubus idaeus.Heredity 22: 465–479.Google Scholar
  3. Jennings, D. L. (1967b). Observations on some instances of partial sterility in red raspberry cultivars.Hort. Res. 7: 116–122.Google Scholar
  4. Jennings, D. L. (1971a). Some genetic factors affecting fruit development in raspberries.New Phytol.70: 361–370.Google Scholar
  5. Jennings, D. L. (1971b). Some genetic factors affecting the development of endocarp, endosperm and embryo in raspberries.New Phytol.70: 885–895.Google Scholar
  6. Jennings, D. L. (1971c). Some genetic factors affecting seedling emergence in raspberries.New Phytol.70: 1103–1110.Google Scholar
  7. Jennings, D. L. (1972). Aberrant segregation of a gene in the raspberry and its association with effects on seed development.Heredity 29: 83–90.Google Scholar
  8. Jennings, D. L., D. L. Craig &P. B. Topham (1967). The role of the male parent in the reproduction of Rubus.Heredity 22: 43–55.Google Scholar
  9. Jennings, D. L. &P. B. Topham (1971). Some consequences of raspberry pollen dilution for its germination and for fruit development.New Phytol.70: 371–380.Google Scholar
  10. Keep, E. (1968). Incompatibility in Rubus with special reference to R. idaeus L.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10: 253–262.Google Scholar
  11. Rowlands, D. G. (1964). Self-incompatibility in sexually propagated cultivated plants.Euphytica 13: 157–162.Google Scholar
  12. Stephens, S. G. (1942). Colchicine-produced polyploids in Gossypium. I. An autotetraploid Asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with wild diploid species.J. Genet. 44: 272–295.Google Scholar
  13. Topham, P. B. (1967a). Fertility in crosses involving diploid and autotetraploid raspberries. I. The embryo.Ann. Bot. 31: 673–686.Google Scholar
  14. Topham, P. B. (1967b). Fertility in crosses involving diploid and autotetraploid raspberries. II. Fruit and seed development.Ann. Bot. 31: 687–697.Google Scholar
  15. Topham, P. B. (1970a). The histology of seed development in diploid and tetraploid raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.).Ann. Bot. 34: 123–135.Google Scholar
  16. Topham, P. B. (1970b). The histology of seed development following crosses between diploid and autotetraploid raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.).Ann. Bot. 34: 137–145.Google Scholar
  17. Topham, P. B. (1971). Some effects of gibberellin and synthetic auxins on the development of raspberry fruits and seeds.Hort. Res. 11: 18–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. Jennings
    • 1
  1. 1.Scottish Horticultural Research InstituteDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations