Genetica

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 177–201 | Cite as

Chromosome configurations in trisomic oenotheras

  • D. G. Catcheside
Article
Received:

Keywords

Chromosome Configuration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Belling, J. andA. F. Blakeslee, 1925. — The configurations and sizes of the chromosomes in the trivalents of 25-chromosomeDaturas. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.10: 116–20.Google Scholar
  2. Blakeslee, A. F., 1930.—Extra chromosomes a source of variations in the Jimson Weed. Smithsonian Report for 1930, pp. 431–50.Google Scholar
  3. Catcheside, D. G., 1931a.—Meiosis in a triploidOenothera. J. Genet.,24: 145–63.Google Scholar
  4. Catcheside, D. G., 1931b.—Critical evidence of parasynapsis inOenothera. Proc. Roy. Soc. B.,109: 165–84.Google Scholar
  5. Catcheside, D. G., 1932.—The chromosomes of a new haploidOenothera. Cytologia,4: 68–113.Google Scholar
  6. Catcheside, D. G., 1933.—Chromosome catenation in some F1 Oenothera hybrids. J. Genet.,27: 45–69.Google Scholar
  7. Gates, R. R., 1923.—The trisomic mutations ofOenothera. Ann. Bot.,37: 543–63.Google Scholar
  8. Gates, R. R. andD. G. Catcheside 1932.—Gamolysis of various newOenotheras. J. Genet.,26: 143–78.Google Scholar
  9. Gates, R. R. andN. Thomas, 1914.—A cytological study ofOenothera mut.lata andO. mut.semilata in relation to mutation. Q. J. Micr. Sc.,59: 523–71.Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin, K. M., 1933.—A trisomicOenothera. Ann. Bot.,47: 89–100.Google Scholar
  11. Håkansson, A., 1926.—Über das Verhalten der Chromosomen bei der heterotypischen Teilung schwedischerOenothera Lamarckiana und ihrer Mutanten und Bastarden. Hereditas,8: 255–304.Google Scholar
  12. Håkansson, A., 1930.—Zur Zytologie trisomischer Mutanten ausOenothera Lamarckiana. Hereditas,14: 1–32.Google Scholar
  13. Haldane, J. B. S., 1931.—The cytological basis of genetical interference. Cytologia,3: 54–65.Google Scholar
  14. Hoeppener, E. andO. Renner, 1929.—Genetische und zytologische Oenotherenstudien. II. Zur Kenntnis vonOenothera rubrinervis, deserens, Lamarckiana gigas, biennis gigas, franciscana, Hookeri, suaveolens, lutescens. Botan. Abhandl.,15: 1–86.Google Scholar
  15. Newton, W. C. F. andC. D. Darlington, 1929.—Meiosis in polyploids. J. Genet.,21: 1–56.Google Scholar
  16. Sheffield, F. M. L., 1927.—Cytological studies of certain meiotic stages inOenothera. Ann. Bot.,41: 779–816.Google Scholar
  17. Verbrugge, M., 1933.—Meiosis and catenation in certain crosses ofOenothera rubricalyx. Ann. Bot. (in press).Google Scholar
  18. Vries, H. de, 1916.—New dimorphic mutants of theOenotheras. Bot. Gaz.,43: 249.Google Scholar
  19. Vries, H. de, 1919.—Oenothera rubrinervis, a half mutant. Bot. Gaz.,47: 1.Google Scholar
  20. Watkins, W. E., 1932.—Hybrid sterility and incompatibility. J. Genet.,25: 125–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff 1933

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Catcheside
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of BotanyUniversity of London King's CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations