Abstract
This paper examines the trend in absentee voting over the last 30 years in California. With the liberalization of absentee voting laws and practices, an increase in the numbers of absentee voters quickly followed. Absentee voters have already demonstrated their ability to influence the outcomes of local elections. An open question is what will become of absentee voters in the future. If they are the model for “voting at home,” and if technological advances allow such, then the behavior of current absentee voters may be indicative of the future electorate. The increasing trend of voters opting for absentee ballots is analyzed by using GLS on a random-effects time-series cross-section model with county-level data. The focus is on identifying structural factors such as changing voter demographics that have influenced the decision of voters to cast absentee ballots. Thirty-three recent statewide elections in California are the basis for this analysis, covering the statewide primary and general elections from November 1962 through November 1994. We find that the impact of demographics and time trends on absentee voting differ between general and primary elections. In addition, we find that a 1977 liberalization law in California had the effect of accelerating the usage of the absentee format. Finally, we conclude that absentee and precinct voting are substitutes in general elections but complements in primary elections.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bechtel, Gordon G. (1990). Share-ratio estimation of the nested multinomial logit modelJournal of Marketing Research 27: 232–237.
Berkson, J. (1955). Maximum likelihood and minimum chi-square estimations of the logistic function.Journal of the American Statistical Association 50: 130–161.
California Secreatary of State.Statement of Vote, November 1962 through November 1994 statewide elections.
Cook, Gale (1991). Mail-order voters tip the balance in close elections.California Journal 22: 101–103.
Donovan, Beth (1989). Parties aggressively court absentee-voter bloc.Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 47: 2894–2896.
Dresslar, Tom (1990). Absentee ballots give Lungren the edge.California Journal 21: 567–569.
Dubin, Jeffrey A., Graetz, Michael J., Udell, Michael A., and Wilde, Louis L. (1992). The demand for tax return preparation services.Review of Economics and Statistics 74: 75–82.
Dubin, Jeffrey A., and Kaslow, Gretchen A. (1994). Racial and ethnic differences in political, participation. Mimeo, California Institute of Technology.
Hamilton, Randy (1983). American all-mail balloting: A decade's experience.Public Administration Review 48: 860–866.
Maddala, G. S. (1971). The use of variance components models in pooling cross section and time series data.Econometrica 39: 341–358.
Maddala, G. S. (1983).Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Magleby, David B. (1987). Participation in mail ballot elections.Western Political Quarterly 40: 79–92.
McFadden, Daniel (1981). Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In Charles F. Manski and David McFadden (eds.),Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mueller, John E. (1969). Voting on the propositions: Ballot patterns and historical trends in California.American Political Science Review 63: 1197–1212.
Norrander, Barbara (1989). Ideological representativeness of presidential primary voters.American Journal of Political Science 33: 570–587.
Norrander, Barbara (1991). Explaining individual participation in presidential primaries.Western Political Quarterly 44: 640–655.
Nownes, Anthony J. (1992). Primaries, general elections, and voter turnout.American Politics Quarterly 20: 205–226.
Oliver, J. Eric (1993). Who votes at home?: The influence of state law and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 6, 1995. Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.
Passell, Peter (1994). Probability experts may decide vote in Pennsylvania.New York Times, April 11, 1994, Section A.
Patterson, Samuel C., and Caldeira, Gregory A. (1985). Mailing in the voter: Correlates and consequences of absentee voting.american Journal of Political Science 29: 766–788.
Quinn, Tony (1983). How Governor Deukmejian won in the mailbox, not the ballot box.California Journal 14: 148–150.
Stemmler, Hal (1983). Absentee ballots, a new frontier in California electoral politics.California Journal 14: 296–298.
Teixeira, Ruy (1992).The Disappearing American Voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Theil, H. (1969). A multinomial extension of the linear logit model.International Economic Review 10: 251–259.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census,county and City Databook, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1977, 1983, 1988, 1994.
Walrath-Riley, Martha (1984). New absentee and mail-in ballot campaigns: The winning edge.Campaigns and elections 5: 20–30.
Willis, Doug (1994). Absentee voting is increasing.Pasadena Star-News, October 17, Section B.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J. (1980).Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dubin, J.A., Kalsow, G.A. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: A view over time. Polit Behav 18, 369–392 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499094
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499094