Nuclear fission in heavy elements by high-energy particles
- 37 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
The results of a radiochemical investigation of nuclear fission in uranium, thorium, and bismuth by protons with an energy of 680 Mev are presented. Using an interpolation method a complete chart of the fission residue products is obtained. It is noted that there is a predominance in the production of nuclei with excess neutrons (58–64%); it is also shown that isotopes with maximum yield lie mainly in the neutron-ex cess region. The probability for symmetric fission is largest in bismuth. The cross sections for fission in uranium and thorium are 55–60% of the geometric cross section; in bismuth it is 5%. The charge distribution of fragments in fission induced by high energy protons is constant and independent of the mass number of the fission fragments and the atomic number of the fissioning nucleus. An analysis of the main features of the fission process seems to indicate that fission in uranium and thorium is due to a combined barrier-emission mechanism.
Keywords
Uranium Bismuth Thorium Interpolation Method Mass NumberPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature cited
- [1]E. Kelly and C. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. 73, 1135 (1948).Google Scholar
- [2]V. Goldansky, E. Tarumov, and V. Penkina, Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 101, 1027 (1955); J. Exptl-Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.). 29, 778 (1955).Google Scholar
- [3]V. Dzhelepov, Doctoral Dissertation, Inst. Nuc. Prob. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. (1954).Google Scholar
- [4]N. Perfilov, N. Ivanova, O. Lozhkin, V. Ostroumov and V. Shamov, Conferenceon Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Acad. Sci U.S.S.R., Div. Chem. Sci. (1955) p. 79.Google Scholar
- [5]N. Perfilov and V. Ostroumov, Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 103, 227 (1955).Google Scholar
- [6]O. Lozhkin, N. Perfilov, and V. Shamov, Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 103, 407(1955).Google Scholar
- [7]V. Ostroumov, Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 103, 403(1955).Google Scholar
- [8]G. Seaborg, B. Cuningham, and H. Hopkins, Phys. Rev. 72, 740 (1947).Google Scholar
- [9]P. O'Connor and G. Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 74, 1189 (1948).Google Scholar
- [10]R. Wolfe and W. Ballon, Phys. Rev. 75, 527 (1949).Google Scholar
- [11]R. Folger, P. Stevenson, and G. Seaborg, Phys. Rev. 98, 107 (1955).Google Scholar
- [12]A. Newton, Phys. Rev. 75, 17 (1949).Google Scholar
- [13]R. Goeckermann and I. Perlman, Phys. Rev. 73, 1127 (1948); 76, 628 (1949).Google Scholar
- [14]A. Murin, B. Preobrazhensky, I. Yutlandov, and M. Yakimov, Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Div. Chem. Sci. (1955), p. 160.Google Scholar
- [15]A. Vinogradov, et al., Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Acad, Sci. U.S.S.R., Div. Chem. Sci. (1955), p. 97.Google Scholar
- [16]A. Lavrukhina, Doctoral Dissertation, Geochem. Inst., Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. (1955).Google Scholar
- [17]F. Pavlotskaya and A. Lavrukhina, J. Atomic Energy 1956, No. 5, 115 (T.p.791).Google Scholar
- [18]L. Glendenin, C. Coryell, and R. Edwards, Radiochemical Studies; the Fission Products 1, No. 4, 489 (1951).Google Scholar
- [19]A. Pappas, “The distribution of nuclear charge in low energy fission,” Report 881 presented by Norwegian delegation to International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Gerreva, 1955.Google Scholar
- [20]P. Kruger and N. Sugarman, Phys. Rev. 99, 1459 (1955).Google Scholar
- [21]L. Marquez, Nuovo cimento 12, 1 (1954).Google Scholar
- [22]V. Shamov, Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 103, 593 (1955).Google Scholar
- [23]E. Douthett and D. Templeton, Phys. Rev. 94, 128 (1954).Google Scholar
- [24]Y. Yamaguchi and Y. Fyjimoto, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Japan) 5, 787 (1950).Google Scholar
- [25]K. Le Couteur, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 63, 259 (1950); A 65, 718 (1952).Google Scholar