Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 193–218 | Cite as

A process model of writing development across the life span

  • Virginia W. Berninger
  • Frances Fuller
  • Dianne Whitaker
Article

Abstract

In this article, we provide an overview of writing development from a product perspective and from a process perspective. Then we discuss modifications of the most influential process model of skilled adult writing to explain beginning and developing writing, including a proposed developmental sequence of the emergence of cognitive processes in writing. Next we report the results of two recent dissertations by the second and third authors supervised by the first author aimed toward contrasting developmental issues: (a) specifying the algorithms or rules of thumb beginning and developing writers may use during on-line planning; and (b) investigating the further development of writing processes among skilled adult writers. In the first study, development was conceptualized as a linear process across age groups. In the second study, development was conceptualized as a horizontal process within skilled adult writers who expanded their expertise. Finally, we consider the developmental constraints and the instructional constraints on writing development and argue for a model of writing development in which endogenous and exogenous process variables interact to determine the outcome of the writing development process.

Key words

writing writing processes adult writers writing development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, R., and Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade students.J. Educ. Psychol. 85(3): 478–508.Google Scholar
  2. Beal, C. (1987). Repairing the message: Children's monitoring and revision skills.Child Devel. 58: 401–408.Google Scholar
  3. Beal, C. (1993). Contributions of developmental psychology to understanding revision: Implications for consultation with classroom teachers.School Psychol. Rev. XXII: 643–655.Google Scholar
  4. Berninger, V. (1994a).Reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective W. C. Brown and Benchmark, Madison, WI. Reprinted by Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Berninger, V. (1994b). Future directions for research on writing disabilities: Integrating endogenous and exogenous variables. In Lyon, G. R. (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. New Views on Measurement Issues Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, (pp. 419–439).Google Scholar
  6. Berninger, V., and Abbott, R. (1995). Modeling developmental and individual variability in reading and writing acquisition: A developmental neuropsychological perspective. In Kirk, U., and Molfese, D. (eds.),Development Variations in Language and Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (to appear).Google Scholar
  7. Berninger, V., and Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for diagnosis of writing disabilities in primary grade children.J. School Psychol. 30: 363–382.Google Scholar
  8. Berninger, V., and Swanson, H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower's model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
  9. Berninger V., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., and Abbott, R. (1992). Lowerlevel developmental skills in beginning writing.Reading Writing: Interdisc. J. 4: 257–280.Google Scholar
  10. Berninger, V., Cartwright, A., Yates, C., Swanson, H., and Abbott, R. (1994a). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades.Reading Writing: Interdisc. J. 6: 161–196.Google Scholar
  11. Berninger, V., Mizokawa, D., Bragg, R., Cartwright, A., and Yates, C. (1994b). Intraindividual differences in levels of written language.Reading Writing Quart. 10: 259–275.Google Scholar
  12. Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., and Nolen, S. (1995). Integrating low-level and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities.Learn. Disab. Quart. 18: 293–309.Google Scholar
  13. Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, L., and Abbott, R. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers.J. School Psychol. 34: 23–52.Google Scholar
  14. Bloom, L., and Lahey, M. (1978),Language Development and Language Disorders, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Burtis, P., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., and Tetroe, J. (1983). The development of planning in writing. In Wells, C. G. and Kroll (eds.),Explorations of Children's Development in Writing, Wiley, Chichester, England, pp. 153–174.Google Scholar
  16. Butterfield, E., Hacker, D., and Plumb, C. (1994). Topic knowledge, linguistic knowledge, and revision skill as determinator of text revision. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 83–141.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing.Rev. Educ. Res. 57: 481–506.Google Scholar
  18. Fuller, F. (1995).Development of Topic-Comment Algorithms and Text Structures in Written Compositions of Students in Grades One Through Nine. Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Garvey, C. (1979). On Responding. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  20. Gibson, E., and Levin, H. (1975).The Psychology of Reading, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses.Lang. Soc. 5: 257–313.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, S., and Winetraub, H. (in press). Review of handwriting research: Progress and prospect from 1980 to 1994.Educ. Psychol. Rev. Google Scholar
  23. Graham, S., Harris, K., MacArthur, C., and Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program.Learn. Disab. Quart. 14: 89–114.Google Scholar
  24. Graves, D. (1975). An examination of the writing processes of seven year old children.Res. Teach. Eng. 9: 227–241.Google Scholar
  25. Graves, D. (1983).Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NJ.Google Scholar
  26. Gruber, J. (1967). Topicalization in child language.Found. Lang. 3: 37–65.Google Scholar
  27. Grundy, D. (1985). Writing anxiety.Arts Psychother. 12(3): 151–156.Google Scholar
  28. Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1992).Helping Young Writers Master the Craft: Strategy Instruction and Self-Regulation in the Writing Process, Brookline Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1994). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration.J. Spec. Educ. 28: 233–247.Google Scholar
  30. Hayes, J., and Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of the writing process. In Gregg, W., and Steinberg, E. R. (eds.),Cognitive Processes in Writing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  31. Henderson, E. H. (1992). The interface of lexical competence and knowledge of written words. In Templeton, S., and Bear, D. (eds.),Development of Orthographic Knowledge and the Foundations of Literacy, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  32. Hidi, S., and Hildyard, A. (1983). The comparison of oral and written productions of two discourse types.Disc. Proc. 6: 91–105.Google Scholar
  33. Hillocks, G. (November 1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies.Am. J. Educ. 133–170.Google Scholar
  34. Hooper, S., Montgomery, J., Swartz, C., Reed, M., Sandler, A., Levine, M., Watson, T., and Wasileski, T. (1994). Measurement of written language expression. In Lyon, G. R., (ed.),Frames of Reference for the Assessment of Learning Disabilities. New Views on Measurement Issues, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, pp. 375–417.Google Scholar
  35. Hudgins, A., and Schultz, J. (1978). On observing: The use of Carkhuff HRD model in writing psychological reports.J. School Psychol. 16: 56–63.Google Scholar
  36. Kicklighter, R., and Bailey-Richardson, B. (1984). Psychological assessments: Tasks and time.School Psychol. Rev. 13: 499–502.Google Scholar
  37. Langer, J. (1986).Children Reading and Writing: Structures and Strategies, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
  38. Lavine, L. O. (1972). The Development of Perception of Writing in Pre-reading Children: A Cross-Cultural Study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Human Development, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  39. MacArthur, C., and Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing.J. Spec. Educ. 21: 22–42.Google Scholar
  40. MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., and Graham, S. (1991). Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms.Learn. Disab. Res. Pract. 6: 201–210.Google Scholar
  41. MacArthur, C., Harris, K., and Graham, S. (1994). Helping students with learning disabilities plan compositions: Instruction in cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 173–198.Google Scholar
  42. McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing ability.J. Mem. Lang. 25: 431–444.Google Scholar
  43. McCutchen, D. (1987). Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing.Disc. Proc. 10: 267–286.Google Scholar
  44. McCutchen, D. (1994). The magical number three, plus or minus two: Working memory in writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  45. McCutchen, D., and Perfetti, C. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production.Text 2: 113–139.Google Scholar
  46. Perfetti, C., and McCutchen, D. (1982). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In Rosenberg, S. (ed.),Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics (Vol. 2), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 105–141.Google Scholar
  47. Sattler, J. (1988).Assessment of Children (3rd Ed.), Jerome M. Sattler, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C. (1987).The Psychology of Written Compositions, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  49. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., and Goleman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In Nystrand, M. (ed.),What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 175–210.Google Scholar
  50. Shellenberger (1982). Presentation and interpretation of psychological data in educational settings. In Reynolds, C. R., and Guthrie, T. B. (eds.),The Handbook of School Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 51–81.Google Scholar
  51. Swanson, H. L., and Berninger, V. (1994). Working memory as a source of individual differences in children's writing. In Butterfield, E. (ed.),Children's Writing: Toward a Process Theory of the Development of Skilled Writing, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 31–56.Google Scholar
  52. Traweek, D., Cartwright, A., and Berninger, V. (in press). A comparison study of beginning literacy programs: Alternatives paths to the same learning outcome.Learn. Disab. Quart. Google Scholar
  53. Vonnegut, K. (1981).Palm Sunday, Dell, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and development psychology.Harvard Educ. Rev. 7: 353–368.Google Scholar
  55. Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In Harris, D. B. (ed.),The Concept of Development: An Issue in the Study of Human Behavior, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 125–148.Google Scholar
  56. Whitaker, D. (1994).How School Psychology Trainees Learn to Communicate Through the School Psychological Report. Dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  57. Whitaker, D. (1995). Developmental Changes and Individual Differences in Processes Underlying School Psychological Report Writing (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  58. Whitaker, D., Berninger, V., Johnston, J., and Swanson, H. L. (1994). Intraindividual differences in levels of written language in intermediate grade writers: Implications for the translation process.Learn. Ind. Diff. 6: 107–130.Google Scholar
  59. Zins, J., and Barnett, D. (1983). Report writing: Legislative, ethical, and professional challenges.J. School Psychol. 21(3): 219–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virginia W. Berninger
    • 1
  • Frances Fuller
    • 1
  • Dianne Whitaker
    • 2
  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations