HEC Forum

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 73–84

Hospital Ethics Committees in practice: The case review function of four HECs in Connecticut

  • Inga G. van der Heide


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Griener GG, Storch JL. Hospital ethics committees: Problems in evaluation.HEC Forum. 1991; 4(1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreno JD. What means this consensus? Ethics committees and philosophical tradition.Journal of Clinical Ethics. 1990; 1(1): 38–43.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mahowald MB. Hospital ethics committees: Diverse and problematic.HEC Forum. 1989; 1(5): 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCormick RA. Ethics committees: Promise or peril?Law, Medicine, & Health Care. 1984: 12(4): 150–55.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melley CD.A philosophical investigation of health care ethics committees: Ethics consultation and the role of the philosopher in the health care setting. (doctoral dissertation) Saarbrucken, Germany; 1991.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ross JW. Why cases sometimes go wrong.Hastings Center Report. 1989; 19(1): 22–23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wolf SM. Ethics Committees and due process: Nesting rights in a community of caring.Maryland Law Review. 1991; 50(3): 798–858.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibson JM, Kushner TK. Will the "conscience of an institution" become society's servant?Hastings Center Report. 1986; 16(3): 9–12.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reich WT.Why hospital ethics committees? A moral assessment of the models by which they function. International Symposium on Ethics Committees in Hospitals. May, 1986 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tong R. The epistemology and ethics of consensus: Uses and misuses of "ethical" expertise.The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 1991; 16(4): 409–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inga G. van der Heide

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations