Advertisement

Clinical Rheumatology

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 511–514 | Cite as

Sensitivity of lateral view cervical spine radiographs taken in the neutral position in atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatic diseases

  • M. Kauppi
  • M. H. Neva
Original Article

Abstract

The value of lateral view cervical spine radiography in various positions of the neck was assessed in patients with rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). We wanted to find out how much information is lost if only neutral position radiographs are used. The series consisted of 65 rheumatoid patients with unstable AAS. Lateral view cervical spine radiographs were taken in the neutral position and during flexion and extension. Neutral position radiographs would have failed to confirm the diagnosis of AAS in 31 cases (48%) and would have failed to record its true severity in 43 cases (66%); their diagnostic sensitivity was 52%. The sensitivity of the neutral radiographs in showing the reversibility of AAS was 48%. Routine cervical spine radiography of rheumatoid patients should include lateral view radiographs taken during flexion and extension. The result may be applied to magnetic resonance imaging, which is usually performed in the neutral position.

Keywords

Atlantoaxial subluxation Cervical spine Radiography Rheumatoid arthritis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal AK, Peppelman WC Jr, Kraus DR, Eisenbeis CH Jr. The cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J 1993;306:79–80.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bland JH. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. J Rheumatol 1974;1:319–42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halla JT, Hardin JG, Vitec J, Alarcon GS. Involvement of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1989;32:652–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kauppi M, Hakala M. Prevalence of cervical spine subluxations and dislocations in a community-based rheumatoid arthritis population. Scand J Rheumatol 1994;23:133–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collacott RA. Atlantoaxial instability in Down's syndrome. Br Med J 1987;294:988–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Santavirta S, Slätis P, Sandelin J, Konttinen YT. Atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with seronegative spondylarthritis. Rheumatol Int 1987;7:43–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Komusi T, Munro T, Harth M. Radiological review: the rheumatoid cervical spine. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1985;14:187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weissman BNW, Aliabadi P, Weinfeld MS, Thomas WH, Sosman JL. Prognostic features of atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Radiology 1982;144:745–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winfield J, Cooke D, Brook AS, Corbett M. A prospective study of the radiological changes in the cervical spine in early rheumatoid disease. Ann Rheum Dis 1981;40:109–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kauppi M, Sakaguchi M, Konttinen YT, Hämäläinen M, Hakala M. Pathogenetic mechanism and prevalence of the stable atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1996;23:831–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oda T, Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Azuma B, Ochi T. Natural course of cervical spine lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine 1995;20:1128–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kauppi M, Sakaguchi M, Konttinen YT, Hämäläinen M. A new method of screening for vertical atlantoaxial dislocation. J Rheumatol 1990;17:167–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kauppi M, Anttila P. A stiff cervical collar in the treatment of rheumatoid atlantoaxial subluxation. Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:771–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kauppi M, Leppänen L, Heikkilä S, Lahtinen T, Kautiainen H. Active conservative treatment of atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1998;37:417–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White RH. Preoperative evaluation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1985;14:287–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bell GR, Stearns KL. Flexion-extension MRI of the upper rheumatoid cervical spine. Orthopedics 1991;9:969–74.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roca A, Bernreuter WK, Alarcon GS. Functional magnetic resonance imaging should be included in the evaluation of the cervical spine in patients with RA. J Rheumatol 1993;20:1485–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kauppi M. The effect of flexion-extension movement on vertical atlantoaxial subluxation measurements. J Rheumatol 1991; 18:1804–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kauppi M. A method for classification of the posterior atlantoaxial subluxation. Clin Rheumatol 1994;13:492–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Clinical Rheumatology 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RheumatologyFinland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryRheumatism Foundation HospitalHeinola
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of OuluFinland

Personalised recommendations