Ergebnisse der Mammographie beim Mammacarcinom

Bauer, K. H.: Das Krebsproblem, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1963.Google Scholar

Dobretsberger, W.: Krebsarzt7, 289 (1961).Google Scholar

Fischedick, O., u.H. Haage: Chirurg9, 402 (1964).Google Scholar

Gage, R. P.: Surg. Gynec. Obstet.103, 559 (1956).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Gershon-Cohen, J., andA. E. Colcher: J. Amer. med. Ass.108, 867 (1937).Google Scholar

—, andH. Ingleby: Radiology59, 77 (1952); Surg. Gynec. Obstet.95, 497 (1952); Surg. Gynec. Obstet.94, 91 (1952);97, 483 (1953); Radiology60, 87 (1953); Amer. J. Roentgenol.77, 132 (1957);79, 122 (1958); J. Amer. med. Ass.166, 869 (1958); Surgery43, 408 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Gros, Ch. M., u.R. Sigrist: Fortschr. Röntgenstr.80, 50 (1954).Google Scholar

Isac, Y., Olch: Acta Univ. internationalis contra cancerum Louvain15, 1145 (1959).Google Scholar

Kratochvil, K.: Fortschr. Röntgenstr.81, 6, 727 (1954); Zbl. Chir.2, 50 (1957); Ärztl. Forsch.11, 543 (1960); Zbl. Chir.33, 1816 (1961); Krebsarzt8/9, 362 (1961); Zbl. Chir.45, 1753 (1963).Google Scholar

Munrean, E.: Fortschr. Röntgenstr.81, 201 (1954);94, 509 (1961).Google Scholar

Philipp, R., B. Heymer undH. J. Maurer: Chirurg.9, 398 (1964).Google Scholar

Pierce, E. H., O. Th. Clagett, J. R. Mc Donald, andR. P. Gage: Surg. Gynec. Obset.103, 559 (1956).Google Scholar

Widow, W., u.G. Marx: Chirurg33, 9 (1962).PubMedGoogle Scholar