Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 122, Issue 1–2, pp 102–104 | Cite as

Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery: Results in 130 cases

  • J. Fandiño
  • C. Botana
  • A. Viladrich
  • J. Gomez-Bueno
Clinical Articles


Out of a series of 1850 cases operated upon for lumbar disc herniation 130 underwent re-operation because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. Re-operation was successful in 62%. The prognosis of re-operation was not related to special clinical symptoms and signs but only to the operative findings.

Herniations at other levels and recurrences of lumbar disc herniations had the best results (excellent in 98% respectively 54%), but scar formations alone came out much less satisfactory (only 38% excellent results).

Computed tomography (CT) findings were less reliable in distinguishing between disc prolapse and fibrosis than magnet resonance imaging (MR). Therefore MR is the diagnostic method of choice in these conditions, and scar formations alone should be considered a contra-indication for re-operation.


Lumbar disc herniation re-operation recurrent disc herniation scar formation diagnostic methods outcome 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barr JC, Kubik CS, Molloy MK (1967) Evaluation of end results in treatment oof ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs with protrusion of nucleus pulposus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 125: 250–256Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper DF, Feuer H (1982) Lumbar microdiscectomy. J Indiana State Med Assoc 74: 674–675Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebeling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ (1986) Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review of 485 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81: 45–52Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebeling U, Kalbarcyk H, Reulen HJ (1989) Microsurgical reoperation following lumbar disc surgery. Timing, surgical findings, and outcome in 92 patients. J Neurosurg 70: 397–404Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fankhauser H, Mansouri B, de Tribolet N (1986) Ré-intervention apres cure de Hernie discale. Confrontation entre radiologie et constatation opératoire dans 18 cas. Neurochirurgie 32: 52–55Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Marvel JP, Nardini RJ, Rothman RH (1979) Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 61:1077–1082Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frocrain L, Duvauferrier R, Husson JL, Noël J, Ramée A, Pawlotsky Y (1989) Recurrent postoperative sciatica: evaluation with MR Imaging and enhanced CT. Radiology 170: 531–533Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goald HJ (1981) Microlumbar discectomy: follow-up of 477 patients. J Microsurg 2: 95–100Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greenwood J Jr, McGuire TH, Kimbell F (1952) Study of causes of failure in the herniation intervertebral disc operation: an analysis of sixty-seven reoperation cases. J Neurosurg 9: 15–20Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gurdjian ES, Ostrowski AZ, Hardy WG,et al (1961) Results of operative treatment of protruded and ruptured lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 18: 783–791Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS,et al (1988) Lumbar spine: Postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167: 817–824Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Law JD, Lehman RAW, Kirsch WM (1978) Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg 48: 259–263Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis PJ, Weir BKA, Broad RW,et al (1987) Long term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67: 49–53Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maroon JC, Abla AA (1985) Microlumbar discectomy. Clin Neurosurg 33: 407–47Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salenius P, Laurent LE (1977) Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A survey of 886 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48: 630–634Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schubiger O, Valavanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251–254Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomalske G, Galow W, Ploke G (1977) Critical comments on a comparison of two series (1000 patients each) of lumbar disc surgery. Adv Neurosurg 4: 22–27Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams RW (1978) Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 3: 175–182Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilson DH, Kenning J (1979) Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 42: 137–140Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiltse LL (1977) Surgery for intervertebral disk disease of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 129: 22–45Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wiltse LL (1975) Psychological testing predicting the success of low back surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 6: 317–318Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang PJ, Seeger JF, Dzioba RB (1986) Highdose IV contrast in CT scanning of the postoperative lumbar spine. AJNR 7: 703–707Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Fandiño
    • 1
  • C. Botana
    • 1
  • A. Viladrich
    • 1
  • J. Gomez-Bueno
    • 1
  1. 1.Servicio de Neurocirugía del Hospital General de VigoVigoEspaña

Personalised recommendations