Educational research in England and Wales

H. G. Armstrong: “A Comparison of the Performance of Summer and Atumn born Children at Eleven and Sixteen,”British Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 1966, pp. 72–76.Google Scholar

J. C. Barker-Lunn: “The Effects of Streaming and other Forms of Grouping in Junior Schools: Interim Report,”New Research in Education, 1. Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967A.Google Scholar

J. C. Barker-Lunn: “The Effects of Streaming and Non-Streaming in Junior Schools: Second Interim Report,”New Research in Education, 1. Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967B.Google Scholar

J. B. Biggs:Anxiety, Motivation and Primary School Mathematics, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1962.Google Scholar

J. B. Biggs:Methods of Teaching Mathematics in the Primary School, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967.Google Scholar

C. Burstall: “The French Project: An Interim Report,”New Research in Education, 1. Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967.Google Scholar

Crowther Report,15 to 18, Council for Education (England), London: H.M.S.O. 1959.Google Scholar

R. R. Dale:Down Stream — Failure in the Grammar School, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1964.Google Scholar

J. W. B. Douglas:The Home and the School. A study of ability and attainment in the primary schools, London: MacGibbon & Kee 1964.Google Scholar

J. A. Downing:The i.t.a. Reading Experiment, London: Evans Bros. 1964.Google Scholar

J. Downing andB. Jones: “Some Problems of Evaluating i.t.a. — A Second Experiment,Educational Research, 8, 1966, p. 100.Google Scholar

J. E. Floud andA. H. Halsey: “Intelligence Tests, Social Class and Selection for Secondary Schools,”British Journal of Sociology, 8, 1957, p. 33.Google Scholar

E. J. Goodacre:Reading in Infant Classes. A Survey of the Teaching Practice and Conditions in 100 Infant Schools and Departments, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967A.Google Scholar

E. J. Goodacre:Teachers and their Pupils' Home Background. An Investigation into Teachers' Attitudes and Expectations in Relation to their Estimates and Records of Pupils' Abilities, Attributes and Reading Attainment, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967B.Google Scholar

M. L. Kellmer Pringle andT. Cox: “The Influence of Schooling and Sex on Test and General Anxiety as Measured by Sarason's Scales,”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 4, 1963, pp. 157–165.Google Scholar

M. L. Kellmer Pringle andJ. B. Edwards: “Some Moral Concepts and Judgements of Junior School Children,”British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 1964, pp. 196–215.Google Scholar

M. L. Kellmer Pringle andI. R. McKenzie: “Teaching Method and Rigidity in Problem Solving,”British Journal of Educational Psychology, 35, 1965, pp. 50–59.Google Scholar

M. L. Kellmer Pringle andS. Gooch:Four Years On — A Follow-up Study at School Leaving Age of Children Formerly Attending a Traditional and Progressive Junior School, London: Longmans in ass. with the National Bureau for Co-operotion in Child Care, 1966.Google Scholar

M. L. Kellmer Pringle, N. R. Butler, R. Davie:11,000 Seven-Year Olds, London: Longmans in ass. with the National Bureau for Co-operation in Child Care, 1967.Google Scholar

J. M. Morris:Standards and Progress in Reading, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1966.Google Scholar

N.B.C.C.:Second Annual Report 1964–65, London: The National Bureau for Co-operation in Child Care, 1965.Google Scholar

Newsom Report,Half Our Future, A Report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England), London: H.M.S.O. 1963.Google Scholar

N.F.E.R.:Comprehensive Education — A Second List of References, Information Service, N.F.E.R. 1966A.Google Scholar

N.F.E.R.:Annual Report National Foundation for Educational Research. Slough: N.F.E.R. 1966B.Google Scholar

N.F.E.R.:The i.t.a. Symposium, Slough: N.F.E.R. 1967.Google Scholar

Nuffield Foundation:Report for the Year Ended 31st March 1966, Oxford: University Press 1966.Google Scholar

D. A. Pidgeon: “Date of Birth and Scholastic Performance,”Educational Research, 8, 1965, pp. 3–7.Google Scholar

Plowden Report,Children and Their Primary Schools, London: H.M.S.O. 1967.Google Scholar

Robbins Report,Higher Education, Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins, London: H.M.S.O. 1964.Google Scholar

Schools Council: “Raising the Schools Leaving Age — A Co-operative Programme of Research and Development,” Working Paper No. 2, London: H.M.S.O. 1965A.Google Scholar

Schools Council: “English — A Programme for Research and Development in English Teaching,” Working Paper No. 3, London: H. M.S.O. 1965B.Google Scholar

Schools Council: “Sixth Form Curricula and Examinations,” Working Paper No. 5, London: N.F.E.R. 1966A.Google Scholar

Schools Council: “The 1965 C.S.E. Monitoring Experiment — A Report to the Schools Council by the National Foundation for Educational Research,” Working Paper No. 6, Part 2, London: H.M.S.O. 1966B.Google Scholar

L.Skurnik and T.Kawwa: “After Examinations: A Report on the Educational and Occupational Plans of Pupils who Took C.S.E. or G.C.E. Examinations in 1965,”New Research in Education, 1, N.F.E.R. 1967.Google Scholar

V. Southgate: “Approaching i.t.a. Results with Caution,”Educational Research, 7, 1965, p. 2.Google Scholar

“Warblington Experiment in Closed-Circuit Television,” The final Report Winchester County Education Offices, 1965.Google Scholar

F. W. Warburton: “Construction of the New British Intelligence Scale: Progress Report,”Bulletin of the British Psychology Society, 19, 1966, pp. 65, 68–71.Google Scholar

L. J. Westwood: “Re-assessing the Role of the Head,”Education for Teaching, 71, 1967A, p. 65. London: A.T.C.D.E.Google Scholar

L. J.Westwood: “The Role of the Teacher,”Educational Research, 9, No. 2, 1967B.Google Scholar

J. Williams: “Some Problems Involved in the Experimental Comparison of Teaching Methods,”Educational Research, 8, 1965, p. 26.Google Scholar

J. Williams: “Method Reversion: The Problem of Sustaining Changes in Teacher Behaviour,”Educational Research, 8, 1966, p. 128.Google Scholar

S.Wiseman:Education and Environment, Manchester University Press 1964.Google Scholar

A. Yates andD. A. Pidgeon:Admission to Grammar Schools. Third Interim Report on the Allocation of Primary School Leavers to Courses of Secondary Education), London: Newnes 1957. (The first and second reports were published in 1950 and 1952).Google Scholar