Advertisement

Max Weber's conception of the state

  • Karl Dusza
Ethics, Power and Political Formations: Three Studies

Keywords

Social Psychology Political Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. (1983).Negative Dialectics. Translated by E. B. Ashton New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Andreski, Stanislav. (1964). Method and Substantive Theory in Max Weber.British Journal of Sociology 15:1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, Adolf. (1953).Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  4. Beyer, Bruno. (1931). “Zur Frage der Enstehung der Staaten.”Zeitschrift fuer die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 69:1–50.Google Scholar
  5. Brunner, Otto. (1965).Land und Herrschaft. 5th ed. Vienna: Rohrer.Google Scholar
  6. Carre de Malberg, Raymod. (1920).Contribution a la theorie generale de l'Etat, vol. 1. Paris: Tennin.Google Scholar
  7. Dowdall, H. C. (1923). “The Word ‘State’”.Law Quarterly Review 39:98–125.Google Scholar
  8. Elias, Norbert. (1982).The Civilizing Process, vol. 2,Power and Civility. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, Rupert. (1928).State and Sovereignty in Modern Germany, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. d'Entreves, Alexander Passerin. (1967).The Notion of the State. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  11. Esmein, Adhemar. (1927).Elements de droit constitutionnel francais et compare, vol. 1, 8th ed. Revised by Henry Nezard. Paris: Societe anonyme du Recueil SireyGoogle Scholar
  12. Eulau, Heinz. (1963).The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol, eds., (1985).Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Freund, Julien. (168). “Der Staat und das Politische.”Studium Generale 21:675–691.Google Scholar
  15. Gierke, Otto von. (1954).Das Deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht, vol. 2Geschichte des Deutschen Koerperschaftsbegriffs. Graz: Akademische Druck- un Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
  16. —. (1934).Natural Law and the Theory of Society, 1500–1800 Translated with an Introduction by Ernest Barker. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
  17. — (1958).Political Theories of the Middle Age. Translated with Introduction by F. W. Maitland. Cambridge. The University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guilleaume, Emil. (1967). “Das Kabinettssystem.” Pp. 426–438 inStrukturwandel der Modernen Regierung, edited by Theo Stammen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, Juergen. (1983).Strukturwandel der Oeffentlichkeit. 14th Ed. Darmstadt und Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  20. Haefelin, Ulrich. (1959).Die Rechtspersoenlichkeit des Staates, vol. 1,Dogmengeschichtliche Darstellung. Tuebingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  21. Heintschel, D. E. (1956).The Medieval Concept of an Ecclesiastical Office. Washington: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
  22. Heller, Hermann. (1931). “Political Power.” Pp. 300–305 inEncyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. — (1931) “Staat.” Pp. 609–616 inHandwoerterbuch der Soziologie, edited by Alfred Vierkandt. Stuttgart, Emke.Google Scholar
  24. — (1963).Staatslehre. 3d ed. Edited by Gerhart Niemayer. Leiden: Sijthoff.Google Scholar
  25. Hintze, Otto. (1962).Staat und Verfassung. 2d., enl. ed. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  26. Jellinek, Georg. (1905).Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Haering.Google Scholar
  27. — (1901).The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens. A Contribution to Modern Constitutional History. Translated by Max Max Farrand. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  28. Jessop, Bob. (1982).The Capitalist State. Marxist Theories and Methods. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kelsen, Hans. (1961).General Theory of Law and the State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
  30. Kern, Ernst. (1949).Moderner Staat und Staatsbegriff. Hamburg: Rechts- und Staatswissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
  31. Krasner, Stephen D. (1984). “Approaches to the State. Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamism.Comparative Politics 16:223–246.Google Scholar
  32. Krueger, Herbert. (1964)Allgemeine Staatslehre. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  33. Loewenstein, Karl. (1957).Political Power and the Governmental Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. —. (1961). “Verfassungsrecht und Verfassungsrealitaet.” Pp. 430–480 in Karl Loewenstein,Beitraege zur Staatssoziologie, Tuebingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  35. Mager, Wolfgang. (1968).Zur Enstehung des modernen Staatsbegriffs. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.Google Scholar
  36. Mansfield, Jr., Harvey C. (1983). “On the Impersonality of the Modern State. A Comment on Machiavelli's Use of Stato.”American Political Science Review 77:849–857.Google Scholar
  37. Meisner, Heinrich Otto. (1962).Verfassung Verwaltung, Regierung in neuerer Zeit. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, Arnold O. (1950). “Zur Geschichte des Wortes Staates.”Welt as Geschichte 10:229–239.Google Scholar
  39. Miliband, Ralph. (1969).The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Mommsen, Wolfgang. (1974).The Age of Bureaucracy. Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  41. Oakeshott, Michael. (1975). “The Vocabulary of a Modern European State.”Political Studies, 23:319–341, 410–414.Google Scholar
  42. Poulantzas, Nicos. (1975).Political Power and Social Classes. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  43. Quaritsch, Helmut. (1970).Staat und Souveraenitaet, vol. 1,Die Grundlagen. Frankfurt: Athenaeum.Google Scholar
  44. Poggi, Gianfranco. (1978).The Development of the Modern State. Stanford: The University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Redslob, Robert. (1918).Die parliamentarische Regierung. Tuebingen: MohrGoogle Scholar
  46. Riedel, Manfred. (1975). “Gesellschaft, buergerliche.” Pp. 718–800 inGeschichtliche Grundbegriffe, vol. 2. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
  47. Ross, Alf. (1961). “On the Concepts ‘State’ and ‘State Organs’ in Constitutional Law.”Scandinavian Studies in Law 5:111–129.Google Scholar
  48. Roth, Guenther. (1968). “Introduction.” Pp. xxvii-civ in Max Weber,Economy and Society, New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
  49. Salter, Arthur. (1952).Parliament—A Survey. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  50. Schmitt, Carl. (1976).The Concept of the Political. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Skalweit, Stephan. (1975).Der ‘moderne Staat.’ Ein historischer Begriff und seine Problematik. Opladen: Westdeutscher.Google Scholar
  52. Skocpol, Theda. (1985). “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” Pp. 3–37 inBringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Ruschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: The University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stammen, Theo, ed. (1967).Strukturwandel der modernen Regierung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  54. Thoma, Richard. (1926). “Staat (Allgemeine Staatslehre).” Pp. 724–756 inHandwoerterbuch der Staatswissenschaften, vol. 7, 4th ed. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
  55. Tilly, Charles, ed. (1975).The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Truman, David B. (1955). “The Impact on Political Science of the Revolution in the Behavioral Sciences.” Pp. 202–231 inResearch Frontiers in Politics and Government. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
  57. Weber, Max. (1949)The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Translated and Edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. —. (1958a).Gesammelte Politische Schriften. 2d ed., enl., Edited by Johannes Winckelmann. Tuebingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  59. —. (1958b). “Politics as a Vocation.” Pp. 77–128 inFrom Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited and translated by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press. (HereafterEssays)Google Scholar
  60. Weber, Max. (1958c). “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” Pp. 267–301 inEssays.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, Max. (1958d). “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” Pp. 323–359 inEssays.Google Scholar
  62. —. (1958e). “The Tree Types of Legitimate Rule.” Translated by Hans H. Gerth.Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions 4:1–11.Google Scholar
  63. —. (1968).Economy and Society. Edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. New York: Bedminster.Google Scholar
  64. —. (1976a).The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations. Translated by R. I. Frank. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  65. —. (1976b).The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
  66. —. (1980). “The National State and Economic Policy.” Translated by Keith Tribe.Economy and Society 9:420–449.Google Scholar
  67. —. (1981). “Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology.” Translated by Edith Graber.Sociological Quarterly 22: 145–180.Google Scholar
  68. Wheare, K. C. (1956).Modern Constitutions. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Winckelmann, Johannes. (1964). “Max Webers historische und soziologische Verwaltungsforschung.”Annali della Fondazione Italiana per la Storia Amministrativa 1 27–67.Google Scholar
  70. —. (1965). “Max Weber-Das Soziologische Werk.”Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 17:743–790.Google Scholar
  71. —. (1966) “Max Webers Verstaendnis von Mensch und Gesellschaft.” Pp. 195–243 inMax Weber, Gedaechtnisschrift, edited by Karl Engisch, Bernhard Pfister, Johannes Winckelmann. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  72. Wolff, Hans J. (1933)Organschaft und Juristische Person. 2 vols. Berlin: Heymanns.Google Scholar
  73. — (1970).Verwaltungsrecht, vol. 2,Organizations- und Dienstrecht. 3d ed., rev. and enl. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  74. Wolff, Kurt H. ed., (1950).The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Dusza

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations