Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 249–256 | Cite as

Justice and organizational citizenship: A commentary on the state of the science

  • Jerald Greenberg
Article

Abstract

The present article discusses the state of the science regarding the connection between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as reflected by the articles included in this issue. The research described in these articles reaches a conclusion in need of further elaboration—namely, that people will behave altruistically toward the oroganizations in which they work when they believe those organizations have treated them fairly. Various conceptual issues are discussed. These include: the willingness of people to express inequity distress by withholding OCB, the relative importance of procedural justice compared to distributive justice as a determinant of OCB (especially the social aspects of procedural justice), and the extent to which a reduction in OCB may reflect a desire to influence another individual, or the organization in general. A variety of methodological issues are also discussed. In this connection, it is suggested that correlational, questionnaire measures be supplemented by open-ended interview studies as well as laboratory investigations. Moreover, if questionnaires continue to be used, then it is recommended that attempts be made to improve the validity of both measures of justice and OCB.

Key Words

organizational justice organizational citizenship behavior fairness distributive justice procedural justice 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), 199–245. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (1982). The justice concept in social psychology. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 1–41. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Damon, W. (1977),The Social World of the Child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 3), 141–183. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  5. Furnham, A. (1990).The Protestant Work Ethic: The Psychology of Work Beliefs and Behaviors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.),Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, 79–103. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, J. (1990b). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561–568.Google Scholar
  9. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories.Academy of Management Review, 12, 9–22.Google Scholar
  10. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340–342.Google Scholar
  11. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 389–435. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Greenberg, J. (1979). Equity, equality, and the Protestant ethic: Allocating rewards following fair and unfair competition.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 217–226.Google Scholar
  13. Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.).Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 437–469. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (Ed.).Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, 211–267. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
  15. Krebs, D. (1982). Prosocial behavior, equity, and justice. In Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior, 261–308. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lemer, M. J. (1982). The justice motive in human relations and the economic model of man: A radical analysis of facts and fictions. In Derlega, V., & Grezlak, J. (Eds.),Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research, 42–65. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Piaget, J. (1965/1932).The Moral Judgment of the Child. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Podsakoff, P. M. & MacKenzie, S. B. (1989).A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished working paper, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  21. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness.Social Justice Research, 1, 161–176.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerald Greenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management and Human Resources, College of BusinessThe Ohio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations