Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 159–168 | Cite as

The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the argentine ant

  • J. -L. Deneubourg
  • S. Aron
  • S. Goss
  • J. M. Pasteels
Article

Abstract

Workers of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis,start to explore a chemically unmarked territory randomly. As the exploratory front advances, other explorers are recruited and a trail extends from it to the nest. Whereas recruitment trails are generally constructed between two points, these exploratory trails have no fixed destination, and strongly resemble the foraging patterns of army ants. A minimal model shows how the exploratory pattern may be generated by the individual workers' simple trail-laying and -following behavior, illustrating how complex collective structures in insect colonies may be based on self-organization.

Key words

Iridomyrmex humilis Argentine ant exploration self-organization swarm pattern mathematical model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aron, S., and Pasteels, J. M. (1988). Spatial organisation in the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr).Acta Coll. Ins. Soc. 203–210.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, S., Pasteels, J. M., and Deneubourg, J. L. (1989). Trail-laying behaviour during exploratory recruitment in the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr).Biol. Behav 14: 207–217.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W. B., Ermoliev, Y. M., and Kaniovski, Y. M. (1986). Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure.Eur. J. Op. Res.30.Google Scholar
  4. Cavill, J. W. K., Robertson, P. C., and Davies, N. W. (1979). An Argentine ant aggregation factor.Experientia 35: 989–990.Google Scholar
  5. Deneubourg, J. L. (1977). Application de l'ordre par fluctuations à la description de certaines étapes de construction du nid chez les termites.Ins. Soc. 24: 117–130.Google Scholar
  6. Deneubourg, J. L., Goss, S., Pasteels, J. M., Fresneau, D., and Lachaud, J. P. (1987). Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (II). Learning to forage and division of labor. In Pasteels, J. M., and Deneubourg, J. L. (eds.),From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 177–196.Google Scholar
  7. Deneubourg, J. L., Goss, S., Franks, N., and Pasteeis, J. M. (1989). The blind leading the blind: Modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns.J. Insect Behav. 2: 719–725.Google Scholar
  8. Focardi, S., Deneubourg, J. L., and Chelazzi, G. (1985). How shore morphology and orientation mechanisms can affect the spatial organization of intertidal molluscs.J. Theor. Biol. 112: 771–782.Google Scholar
  9. Franks, N. R., and Fletcher, C. R. (1983). Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration:Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 261–270.Google Scholar
  10. Gordon, D. M. (1988). Group-level exploration tactics in fire ants.Behaviour 104: 162–175.Google Scholar
  11. Goss, S., and Deneubourg, J. L. (1988). Autocatalysis as a source of synchronised rhythmical activity in social insects.Soc. Ins. 35: 310–315.Google Scholar
  12. Goss, S., and Deneubourg, J. L. (1989). The self-organising clock pattern of Messor pergandei (Formicidae, Myrmicinae).Soc. Ins. 36: 339–346.Google Scholar
  13. Grassé, P. P, (1939). La reconstruction du nid et le travail collectif chez les termites supérieurs.J. Psychol. Pathol. Gén. 370–396.Google Scholar
  14. Grassé, P. P. (1959). La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chezBellicositermes natalensis etCubitermes sp. La théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation des termites constructeurs.Ins. Soc. 6: 41–83.Google Scholar
  15. Haken, H. (1983).Synergetics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Keller, E. F., and Segel, L. I. (1970). Initiation of slime-mould aggregation viewed as an instability.J. Theor. Biol. 26: 399–415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moffet, M. W. (1984). Swarm raiding in a myrmicine ant.Naturwissenschaften 71: 588–590.Google Scholar
  18. Moffet, M. W. (1988). Foraging dynamics in the group-hunting myrmicine ant,Pheidologeron diversus.J. Insect Behav. 71: 588–590.Google Scholar
  19. Nicolis, G., and Prigogine, I. (1977).Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O. (1978).Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  21. Pasteels, J. M. (1965). Polyéthisme chez les ouvrières deNasutitermes lujae (Termitidae Isoptères).Biol. Gabon. 1: 191–205.Google Scholar
  22. Pasteels, J. M., Deneubourg, J. L., and Goss, S. (1987). Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (I). Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In Pasteels, J. M., and Deneubourg, J. L. (eds.),From Individual to Collective Behavior in Social Insects, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
  23. Prigogine, I., and Stengers, I. (1984).Order Out of Chaos, Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Rettenmeyer, C. W. (1963). Behavioral studies of army ants.Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 44: 281–465.Google Scholar
  25. Rickli, M., and Leuthold, R. H. (1986). Spatial organisation during exploration and foraging in the harvester termite. Trinervitermes germinatus.Rev. Suisse Zool. 94: 545–551.Google Scholar
  26. Schieve, W. C., and Allen, P. (eds.) (1982).Self-Organization and Dissipative Structures, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  27. Schneirla, T. C. (1940). Further studies on the army ant behavior pattern.J. Comp. Psychol. 29: 401–461.Google Scholar
  28. Schneirla, T. C. (1971). In Topoff, H. R. (ed.),Army Ants: A Study in Social Organization, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  29. Topoff, H. R. (1972). The social behavior of army ants. In Eisner, T., and Wilson, E. O. (eds.), The Insects, Scientific American, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 247–262.Google Scholar
  30. Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 237: 37–72.Google Scholar
  31. Van Vorhis Key, S. E., and Baker, T. C. (1982). Trail-following responses of the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr), to a synthetic trail pheromone component and analogs.J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 3–14.Google Scholar
  32. Van Vorhis Key, S. E., and Baker, T. C. (1986). Observations on the trail deposition and recruitment behaviors of the Argentine ant.Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79: 283–288.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, E. O., and Hölldobler, B. (1988). Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies.Tree 3: 65–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. -L. Deneubourg
    • 1
  • S. Aron
    • 1
  • S. Goss
    • 1
  • J. M. Pasteels
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Behavioural EcologyUniversité Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations