Journal of comparative physiology

, Volume 106, Issue 3, pp 223–252 | Cite as

A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents

I. The stability and lability of spontaneous frequency
  • Colin S. Pittendrigh
  • Serge Daan
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    The circadian pacemakers controlling activity rhythms in four species of rodents are compared, as freerunning systems in constant darkness. In analyzing their stability the distinction is made between (1) spontaneous day-to-day instability of frequency, and (2) a longer-term lability, some of which is traceable to identified causes.

     
  2. 2.

    Serial correlation analysis indicates that the precision (day-to-day stability) of the pacemaker's period is ca. twice as good (estimated s.d.=0.6% of\(\bar \tau \) inMus musculus) as the already remarkable precision of the activity rhythm it drives (average s.d.=1.2% of\(\bar \tau \)).

     
  3. 3.

    Identifiable causes of long-term lability include age and several features of prior entrainment by light. The period and photoperiod of a light cycle have a predictable influence on the subsequent freerunning period (τ) of the pacemaker; they cause “after-effects”. So do single light pulses causing a phase-shift in the freerunning system. Constant light also has an after-effect opposite in sign from the after-effect of long photoperiods.

     
  4. 4.

    After-effects of “skeleton” photoperiods support the hypothesis that the transitions of light to darkness vv. are involved in the entrainment process which leads to changes in τ.

     
  5. 5.

    Both day-to-day instability and long term lability are most pronounced in species (Peromyscus maniculatus, Mus musculus) whose\(\mathop \tau \limits^ = \) is considerably shorter than 24 h; they are least pronounced in hamsters whose\(\mathop \tau \limits^ = \) is indistinguishably close to 24 h.

     
  6. 6.

    The differences between the species in τ and its lability are paralleled by differences in pacemaker lability as measured in light-induced after-effects and in the extent of changes with age. The species evidently differ in the “tightness” with which τ is homeostatically conserved.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff, J.: Die 24-Stundenperiodik der Maus unter konstanten Umgebungsbedingungen. Naturwissenschaften38, 506–507 (1951)Google Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J.: Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.25, 11–28 (1960)Google Scholar
  3. Aschoff, J.: Spontane lokomotorische Aktivität. Handb. Zool.8, 11, 1–74 (1962)Google Scholar
  4. Aschoff, J.: Die Tagesperiodik licht- und dunkelaktiver Tiere. Rev. suisse Zool.71, 528–558 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. Aschoff, J., Gerecke, U., Kureck, A., Pohl, H., Rieger, P., von Saint Paul, U., Wever, R.: Interdependent parameters of circadian activity rhythms in birds and man. In: Biochronometry (ed. M. Menaker), pp. 3–29. Washington: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971Google Scholar
  6. Aschoff, J., Wever, R.: Beginn und Ende der täglichen Aktivität freilebender Vögel. J. Ornithol.103, 1–27 (1962)Google Scholar
  7. Burchard, J.E.: Re-setting a biological clock. Ph. D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1–16 (1958)Google Scholar
  8. Daan, S., Aschoff, J.: Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in captive birds and mammals: Their variations with season and latitude. Oecologia18, 269–316 (1975)Google Scholar
  9. Daan, S., Damassa, D., Pittendrigh, C. S., Smith, E.: An effect of castration and testosterone replacement on a circadian pacemaker in mice (Mus musculus). Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)72, 3744–3747 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. Daan, S., Pittendrigh, C. S.: A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. II. The variability of phase response curves. J. comp. Physiol.106, 253–266 (1976a)Google Scholar
  11. Daan, S., Pittendrigh, C. S.: A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. III. Heavy water and constant light: homeostasis of frequency? J. comp. Physiol.106, 267–290 (1976b)Google Scholar
  12. DeCoursey, P.J.: Effect of light on the circadian activity rhythm of the flying squirrel,Glaucomys volans. Z. vergl. Physiol.44, 331–354 (1961)Google Scholar
  13. DeCoursey, P.J.: Function of a light response rhythm in hamsters. J. cell. comp. Physiol.63, 189–196 (1964)Google Scholar
  14. Eskin, A.: Some properties of the system controlling the circadian activity rhythm of sparrows. In: Biochronometry (Ed. M. Menaker), pp. 55–80. Washington, D.C.: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971Google Scholar
  15. Gwinner, E.: Circadian and circannual rhythms in birds. In: Avian biology (eds. D. S. Farner, J. R. King) vol. V, pp. 221–285. New York and London: Acad. Press 1975Google Scholar
  16. Guyton, A.C.: Textbook of medical physiology. 4th ed., 1032pp. Philadelphia-London-Toronto: Saunders 1971Google Scholar
  17. Hudson, J.W., Kimzey, S.L.: Temperature regulation and metabolic rhythms in populations of the house sparrow,Passer domesticus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.17, 203–217 (1966)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, M.: Effect of continuous light on periodic spontaneous activity of white-footed mice (Peromyscus). J. exp. Zool.82, 315–318 (1939)Google Scholar
  19. Jones, D.C., Kimeldorf, D.J., Rubadeau, D.O., Castanera, T.: Relationships between volitional activity and age in the male rat. Amer. J. Physiol.172, 109 (1953)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Konopka, R., Benzer, S.: Clock mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)68, 2112–2116 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Kramm, K. R.: Circadian activity in the antelope ground squirrel,Ammospermophilus leucurus. Ph. D. Thesis, U. C. Irvine, i–xviii, 1–267 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. Lohmann, M.: Zur Bedeutung der lokomotorischen Aktivität in circadianen Systemen. Z. vergl. Physiol.55, 307–332 (1967)Google Scholar
  23. Menaker, M.: The freerunning period of the bat clock; seasonal variations at low body temperature. J. cell. comp. Physiol.57, 81–86 (1961)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pittendrigh, C. S.: Perspectives in the study of biological clocks. In: Symp. on perspectives in marine biology. (ed. A. A. Buzzati-Traverso), pp. 239–268. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press 1958Google Scholar
  25. Pittendrigh, C. S.: Circadian rhythms and the circadian organization of living systems. Cold. Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.25, 159–184 (1960)Google Scholar
  26. Pittendrigh, C. S.: Circadian rhythms, space research and manned space flight. In: Life sciences and space research V, pp. 122–134. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1967Google Scholar
  27. Pittendrigh, C. S.: Circadian oscillations in cells and the circadian organization of multicellular systems. In: The neurosciences: Third study program, Vol. 38 (eds. F.O. Schmitt, G.O. Worden), pp. 437–458. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1974Google Scholar
  28. Pittendrigh, C. S., Bruce, V. G., Kaus, P.: On the significance of transients in daily rhythms. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)44, 965–973 (1958)Google Scholar
  29. Pittendrigh, D. S., Caldarola, P. C.: General homeostasis of the frequency of circadian oscillations. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)70, 2697–2701 (1973)Google Scholar
  30. Pittendrigh, C. S., Daan, S.: Circadian oscillations in rodents: a systematic increase of their frequency with age. Science186, 548–550 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pittendrigh, C. S., Daan, S.: A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. IV. Entrainment: pacemaker as clock. J. comp. Physiol.106, 291–331 (1976a)Google Scholar
  32. Pittendrigh, C.S., Daan, S.: A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents. V. Pacemaker structure: A clock for all seasons. J. comp. Physiol.106, 333–355 (1976b)Google Scholar
  33. Pittendrigh, C. S., Minis, D. H.: The entrainment of circadian oscillations by light and their role as photoperiodic clocks. Amer. Nat.98, 261–294 (1964)Google Scholar
  34. Pohl, H.: Seasonal change in light sensitivity inCarduelis flammea. Naturwissenschaften59, 518 (1972)Google Scholar
  35. Richter, C. P.: A behaviouristic study of the activity of the rat. Comp. Physiol. Monogr.1, 1–55 (1922)Google Scholar
  36. Semon, R.: Das Problem der Vererbung „Erworbener Eigenschaften.“ Leipzig: Verlag Engelmann (1912)Google Scholar
  37. Thorpe, W. H.: Learning and instinct in animals, 2nd ed., pp. i-x, 1–558. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1966Google Scholar
  38. Wever, R.: Ein mathematisches Modell für biologische Schwingungen. Z. Tierpsychol.21, 359–372 (1964)Google Scholar
  39. Wever, R.: A mathematical model for circadian rhythms. In: Circadian clocks (ed. J. Aschoff), pp. 49–63. Amsterdam: North Holland 1965Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin S. Pittendrigh
    • 1
  • Serge Daan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations