Protoplasma

, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 51–65 | Cite as

Intercalary strip development and dividing cell morphogenesis in the euglenidCyclidiopsis acus

  • J. P. Mignot
  • G. Brugerolle
  • G. Bricheux
Article

Summary

Details of the development of the cortex and of its cytoskeletal components prior to cell division are described forCyclidiopsis acus. The description is based on transmission and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of semi-serial thin sections of cells at progressive stages of division.

Four microtubules (Mt) having precise positions, are associated with each cortical strip. In the interphase cell, however, only two microtubules are associated with each strip or reduced strip within the flagellar canal, the other two being evident only when the strips pass over the external surface of the body. There appear to be organizing centres in the form of dense material extending along the length of MT 2 and MT 3 of each band. The development of each new cortical strip begins as an outgrowth (the “ridge”) in the region of the organizing centres where MT 2 and MT 3 of the new cortical strip appear. The “hook” edge of the epiplasmic layer of each new strip forms first, then the strip extends tangentially to the cell surface, pushing itself between the old strips. The process begins at the anterior part of the cell and extend backwards. As this happens, the two other microtubules (MT 1 and MT 4) appear.

In the interphase cell the strips within the flagellar canal are of two sizes, 16 major strips alternating with 16 minor ones. The number of strips decreases progressively toward the base of the canal. Each strip has two microtubules, possibly corresponding to MT 2 and MT 4 of the cortical strips. During division, the number of canal microtubulepairs increases and doubles, each new strip receiving a pair of microtubules. The old minor strips grow to the same size as the major strips. The process of strip duplication leads to 32 major old strips and 32 minor new, intercalated strips.

Cell division begins with the formation of a cytoplasmic ridge between the two pairs of kinetosomes. The ridge grows to form a partitioning wall, making two reservoirs each containing a flagellar apparatus and three kinetosome associated microtubular rows. A pinching off takes place between the two dorsal rows of paired microtubules at the base of the canal. This zone, marked by additional microtubules, progresses toward the canal aperture and divides the canal in two. The cleavage furrow, which contains additional sets of microtubules, begins at the aperture and progresses posteriorly.

Strip duplication precedes cell division. Of the three sets of microtubular rows associated with the kinetosomes, two are clearly involved in cell division. The dorsal row, associated with the paired microtubules of the cortical folds in the flagellar pocket, extends to the outer cortex (MT 2 and MT 4). The ventral row is associated with the microtubular bands which develop in the partitioning wall at the base of the reservoir in dividing cells and then forms the cryptic cytopharynx. The intermediate row is probably involved in the formation of additional microtubules in the cleavage furrow of the flagellar canal and the cortex.

Keywords

Euglenida Cell morphogenesis Cytoskeleton Cell division 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aufderheide KJ, Frankel J, Williams NE (1977) Formation and positioning of surface-related structures in protozoa. Microbiol Rev 44: 252–302Google Scholar
  2. Beams HW, Kessel RG (1976) Cytokinesis: a comparative study of cytoplasmic division in animal cells. Am Sci 64: 279–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beisson J, Sonneborn TM (1965) Cytoplasm inheritance of the organization of the cell cortex inParamecium aurelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 53: 275–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blose SH (1979) Ten-nanometer filaments and mitosis: maintenance of structural continuity in dividing endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 3372–3376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourrelly P (1951) Note sur un Euglènien incolore:Cyclidiopsis acus. Korsh. Bull Soc Bot France 98: 202–205Google Scholar
  6. Bré MH, Lefort-Tran M (1978) Induction et réversibilité des évènements cuticulaires par carence et réalimentation en vitamine B 12 chezEuglena gracilis. J Ultrastruct Res 64: 362–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bricheux G, Brugerolle G (1986) The membrane cytoskeleton complex of Euglenids. I. Biochemical and immunological characterization of the epiplasmic proteins ofEuglena acus. Europ J Cell Biol 40: 150–159Google Scholar
  8. -Vigues B,Métivier C,Brugerolle G,Peck RK (1986) Parenté immunologique entrePseudomicrothorax dubius, Euglena acus etNoctiluca miliaris. Abstract XXVth Congrès GPLF, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  9. Brugerolle G (1985) Des Trichocystes chez les Bodonidés un caractère phylogénétique supplémentaire entre Kinetoplastida et Euglenida. Protistologica XXI: 339–348Google Scholar
  10. Buetow DE (1968) The biology ofEuglena. I. General biology and ultrastructure. Academic Press, New York London, pp 1–361Google Scholar
  11. Chaly N, Lord A, Lafontaine JG (1977) A lightand electron microscope study of nuclear structure throughout the cell cycle in the EuglenoidAstasia longa (Jahn). J Cell Sci 27: 23–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubreuil RR, Bouck GB (1985 a) The membrane skeleton of a unicellular organism consists of bridged, articulating strip. J Cell Biol 101: 1884–1896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. — — (1985 b) Reconstruction of the membrane skeleton in a unicellular organism. J Cell Biol 101: 287 aGoogle Scholar
  14. Dustin P (1984) Microtubules. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–482Google Scholar
  15. Gallo JM, Schrevel J (1982) Euglenoid movement inDistigma proteus. I. Cortical rotational motion. Biol Cell 44: 139–148Google Scholar
  16. —,Karsenti E, Bornens M, Delacourte A, Schrevel J (1982) Euglenoid movement inDistigma proteus. II. Presence and localization of an actin-like protein. Biol Cell 44: 149–156Google Scholar
  17. Gillot MA, Triemer RE (1978) The ultrastructure of cell division inEuglena gracilis. J Cell Sci 31: 25–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann C, Bouck BG (1976) Immunological and structural evidence for patterned intussusceptive surface growth in a unicellular organism. J Cell Biol 69: 693–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollande A, Valentin J (1969) Appareil de Golgi, pinocytose, lysosomes, mitochondries, bactéries symbiotiques, atractophores et pleuromitose chez les Hypermastigides du genreJoenia. Affinités entre Joenidés et Trichomonadines. Protistologica 5: 39–86Google Scholar
  20. James TW (1963) Cell division and growth studies on synchronized Flagellates. In:Harris RJC (ed) Cell growth and cell division. International Society for cell Biology, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 9–26Google Scholar
  21. Kirk JTO, Juniper BE (1964) The fine structure of the pellicle ofEuglena gracilis. J R Micr Soc 82: 205–210Google Scholar
  22. Kivic PA, Walne PL (1983) An evaluation of a possible phylogenetic relationship between theEuglenophyta andKinetoplastida. Origins of Life 13: 269–288Google Scholar
  23. Lachney CL, Lonergan TA (1985) Regulation of cell shape inEuglena gracilis. III. Involvement of stable microtubules. J Cell Sci 74: 219–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leedale GF (1967) Euglenoid flagellates. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs NJ, pp 1–242Google Scholar
  25. Lefort-Tran M, Bré MH, El Ferjani E (1981) Sequential protein dependent steps in the cell cycle. Initiation and completion of division in Vitamin B 12 replenishedEuglena gracilis. Protoplasma 108: 301–318Google Scholar
  26. — —,Ranck JL, Pouphile M (1980)Euglena plasma membrane during normal and vitamin B 12 starvation growth. J Cell Sci 41: 245–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lornergan TA (1985) Localization of actin, myosin and calmodulin. J Cell Sci 77: 197–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mabuchi I, Okuno M (1977) The effect of myosin antibody on the division of starfish blastomeres. J Cell Biol 74: 251–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mignot JP (1966) Structure et ultrastructure de quelques Euglènomonadines. Protistologica II: 51–117Google Scholar
  30. — (1979) Etude ultrastructurale de la pédogamie chezActinophrys sol (Heliozoaire). I. La division progamique. Protistologica XV: 387–406Google Scholar
  31. Murray JM (1981) Control of cell shape by calcium in theEuglenophyceae. J Cell Sci 49: 99–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. — (1983) Three dimensional structure of a membrane-microtubule complex. J Cell Biol 98: 283–295Google Scholar
  33. — (1984) Disasembly and reconstitution of a membranemicrotubule complex. J Cell Biol 98: 1481–1487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pochmann A (1953) Struktur, Wachstum und Teilung der Körperhülle bei den Eugleninen. Planta 42: 478–548Google Scholar
  35. Schliwa M (1986) The cytoskeleton (an introductory survey). In: Cell biology monographs. Springer, Wien New York, pp 1–326Google Scholar
  36. Schroeder TE (1973) Actin in dividing cells: contractile ring filaments bind heavy meromyosin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70: 1688–1692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sommer JR, Blum JJ (1964) Pellicular changes during division inAstasia longa. Exp Cell Res 35: 423–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Surek B, Melkonian M (1986) A cryptic cytostome is present inEuglena. Protoplasma 133: 39–49Google Scholar
  39. Suzaki T, Williamson RE (1985) Euglenoid movement inEuglena fusca. Evidence for sliding between pellicular strips. Protoplasma 124: 137–146Google Scholar
  40. — — (1986 a) Pellicular Ultrastructure and euglenoid movement inEuglena ehrenbergii Klebs andEuglena oxyuris Schmarda. J Protozool 33: 165–184Google Scholar
  41. — — (1986 b) Ultrastructure and sliding of pellicular structures during euglenoid movement inAstasia longa Pringsheim (Sarcomastigophora, Euglenida). J Protozool 33: 179–184Google Scholar
  42. Triemer RE (1985) Ultrastructural features of mitosis inAnisonema sp. (Euglenida). J Protozool 32: 683–690Google Scholar
  43. Willey RL, Wibel RG (1985 a) The reservoir cytoskeleton and a possible cytostomal homologue inColacium (Euglenophyceae). J Phycol 21: 570–577Google Scholar
  44. — — (1985 b) A cytostome/cytopharynx in green euglenoid flagellates (Euglenales) and its phylogentic implication. Biosystems 18: 369–376PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Mignot
    • 1
  • G. Brugerolle
    • 1
  • G. Bricheux
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Zoologie-Protistologie, Laboratoire CNRS 138Université de Clermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations