Plant and Soil

, Volume 162, Issue 1, pp 135–146 | Cite as

Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem

  • Marianne K. Burke
  • Dudley J. Raynal
Article

Abstract

A large part of the nutrient flux in deciduous forests is through fine root turnover, yet this process is seldom measured. As part of a nutrient cycling study, fine root dynamics were studied for two years at Huntington Forest in the Adirondack Mountain region of New York, USA. Root growth phenology was characterized using field rhizotrons, three methods were used to estimate fine root production, two methods were used to estimate fine root mortality, and decomposition was estimated using the buried bag technique. During both 1986 and 1987, fine root elongation began in early April, peaked during July and August, and nearly ceased by mid-October. Mean fine root (≤ 3 mm diameter) biomass in the surface 28-cm was 2.5 t ha−1 and necromass was 2.9 t ha−1. Annual decomposition rates ranged from 17 to 30% beneath the litter and 27 to 52% at a depth of 10 cm. Depending on the method used for estimation, fine root production ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 t ha−1, mortality ranged from 1.8 to 3.7 t ha−1 yr−1, and decomposition was 0.9 t ha−1 yr−1. Thus, turnover ranged from 0.8 to 1.2 yr−1. The nutrients that cycled through fine roots annually were 4.5–6.1 kg Ca, 1.1–1.4 kg Mg, 0.3–0.4 kg K, 1.2–1.7 kg P, 20.3–27.3 kg N, and 1.8–2.4 kg S ha−1. Fine root turnover was less important than leaf litterfall in the cycling of Ca and Mg and was similar to leaf litterfall in the amount of N, P, K and S cycled.

Key words

fine roots northern hardwood forest nutrient cycling phenology production turnover 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber J D, Melillo J M, Nadelhoffer K J, McClaugherty C A and Pastor J 1985 Fine root turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to quantity and form of nitrogen availability: a comparison of two methods. Oecologia 66, 317–321.Google Scholar
  2. Aber J D, Melillo J, Nadelhoffer K J, Pastor J and Boone R D 1991 Factors controlling nitrogen cycling and nitrogen saturation in northern temperate forest ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 1, 305–315.Google Scholar
  3. Bickelhaupt D H, Davey C B and White E H 1983 Laboratory methods for forest tree nursery soil analysis. SUNY College of Environ. Sci. and For. Misc. Pub. No. 2 (ESF 83-004), Syracuse, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Böhm W 1979 Methods of studying root systems. Springer-Verlag, NY, USA 188 p.Google Scholar
  5. Burke M K and LeBlanc D C 1988 Rapid measurement of fine root length using photoelectronic image analysis. Ecology 69, 1286–1289.Google Scholar
  6. Cox T L, Harris W F, Ausmus B S and Edwards N T 1977 The role of roots in biogeochemical cycles in eastern deciduous forests.In The belowground Ecosystem: a Synthesis of Plant and associated Processes. Ed. J K Marshall. pp 321–326. Range Science Department Science Series No. 26, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Cox T L, Harris W F, Ausmus B S and Edwards N T 1978 The role of roots in biogeochemical cycles in an eastern deciduous forest. Pedobio. 18, 264–271.Google Scholar
  8. David M B, Mitchell M J, Aldcorn D and Harrison R B 1989 Analysis of sulfur in soil, plant and sediment materials: Sample handling and use of an automated analyzer. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21, 119–123.Google Scholar
  9. David M B, Mitchell M J and Scott T J 1987 Importance of biological processes in the sulfur budget of a northern hardwood ecosystem. Biol. Fert. Soils. 5, 258–264.Google Scholar
  10. Dustin D C and Raynal D J 1988 Effects of simulated acid rain on sugar maple seedling root growth. Environ. Exper. Bot. 28, 207–213.Google Scholar
  11. Edwards N T and Harris 1977 Carbon cycling in a mixed deciduous forest floor. Ecology 58, 431–437.Google Scholar
  12. Fahey T J, Hughes J W, Ou M and Arthur M A 1988 Root decomposition and nutrient flux following whole-tree harvest of northern hardwood forest. For. Sci. 34, 744–768.Google Scholar
  13. Gosz J R, Likens G E and Bormann F H 1973 Nutrient release from decomposing leaf and branch litter in the Hubbard Brook Forest, New Hampshire. Ecol. Monogr. 43, 173–191.Google Scholar
  14. Harley J L 1937 Ecological observations on the mycorrhiza of beech (preliminary note). J. Ecol. 25, 421–423.Google Scholar
  15. Harris W F, Kinerson R S and Edwards N T 1977 Comparison of belowground biomass of natural deciduous forest and loblolly pine plantations.In The belowground Ecosystem: A Synthesis of Plant-associated Processes. Ed. J K Marshall. pp 29–38 Range Science Department Science Series No. 26. Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Harris W F, Santantonio D and McGinty D 1979 The dynamic belowground ecosystem.In Forests: Fresh perspectives from ecosystem analysis. Ed. R H Waring, Proceedings of the 40th Ann. Biol. Colloq. 1979, Oregon State U. Press, Corvallis, OR, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Hendrick R L and Pregitzer K S 1993 Patterns of fine root mortality in two sugar maple forests. Nature 361, 59–61.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson D W and Lindberg S E 1992 Atmospheric deposition and forest nutrient cycling. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA. 707 p.Google Scholar
  19. Joslin J D and Henderson G S 1987 Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine root turnover in a white oak stand. For. Sci. 33, 330–346.Google Scholar
  20. Keyes M R and Grier C C 1981 Above- and belowground net production in 40-year-old Douglas-fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 599–605.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhns M R, Garre H E, Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1985 Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential, and leaf water potential. For. Sci. 31, 612–629.Google Scholar
  22. Kurz W A and Kimmins J P 1987 Analysis of some sources of error in methods used to determine fine root production in forest ecosystems: a simulation approach. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 909–912.Google Scholar
  23. Lauenroth W K, Hunt H W, Swift D M and Singh J S 1986 Reply to Vogt et al. Ecology 67, 580–582.Google Scholar
  24. McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1982 The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology 63, 1481–1490.Google Scholar
  25. McClaugherty C A, Aber J D and Melillo J M 1984 Decomposition dynamics of fine roots in forested ecosystems. Oikos 42, 378–386.Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell M J, Burke M K and Shepard J P 1992 Seasonal and spatial patterns of S, Ca, and N dynamics of a Northern Hardwood forest ecosystem. Biogeochemistry. 17, 165–189.Google Scholar
  27. Mollitor A W and Raynal D J 1982 Acid precipitation and ionic movement in Adirondack forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 137–141.Google Scholar
  28. Monk C D and Day Jr F P 1985 Vegetation analysis, primary production and selected nutrient budgets for a southern Appalachian oak forest: a synthesis of IBP studies at Coweeta. For. Ecol. Manage. 1087–113.Google Scholar
  29. Morrow R R 1950 Periodicity and growth of sugar maple surface layer roots. J. For. 48, 875–881.Google Scholar
  30. Nadelhoffer K J, Aber J D and Melillo JM 1985 Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377–1390.Google Scholar
  31. Nadelhoffer K J and Raich J W 1992 Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73, 1139–1147.Google Scholar
  32. Nambiar E K S 1987. Do nutrients retranslocate from fine roots? Can. J. For. Res. 17, 913–918.Google Scholar
  33. Ovington J D and Murray C 1968 Seasonal periodicity of root growth of birch trees.In Methods of productivity studies in Root Systems and Rhizosphere Organisms. Proceedings of the International Symposium, USSR. August 28–Sept 12, 1968. USSR Academy of Science. pp 146–154.Google Scholar
  34. Persson H 1980a Death and replacement of fine roots in a mature Scots pine stand.In Structure and Function of northern Coniferous forests - an ecosystem study. Ed. T Persson. Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 32, 251–260.Google Scholar
  35. Persson H 1980b Spatial distribution of fine-root growth, mortality and decomposition in a young Scots pine stand in Central Sweden. Oikos 34, 77–87.Google Scholar
  36. Raich J W and Nadelhoffer K J 1989 Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70, 1346–1354.Google Scholar
  37. Raynal D J, Raleigh F S and Mollitor A V 1983 Characterization of atmospheric deposition and ionic input at Huntington Forest, Adirondack Mountains, New York. ESF 83-003. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Institute of Environmental Program Affairs, Syracuse, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Richardson S D 1958 Bud dormancy and root development in Acer saccharinum.In The physiology of forest trees, Ed. K V Thimann. pp 409–425. Ronald Press, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Rutman S 1983 Seedling Population Dynamics of Northern Hardwoods in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. M.S. Thesis. State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Safford L O 1974 Effect of fertilization on biomass and nutrient content of fine roots in a beech-birch-maple stand. Plant and Soil 40, 349–363.Google Scholar
  41. Santantonio D, Hermann R K and Overton W S 1977 Root biomass studies in forest Ecosystems. Pedobiol. 17, 1–31.Google Scholar
  42. SAS Institute, Inc 1985a SAS/GRAPH user's guide, version 5 edition, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  43. SAS Institute, Inc 1985b SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edition. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  44. Singh J S, Lauenroth W K, Hunt H W and Swift D M 1984 Bias and random errors in estimators of net root production: a simulation approach. Ecology 65, 1760–1764.Google Scholar
  45. Somers R C 1986 Soil Classifcation, Genesis, Morphology, and Variability of Soils found within the Central Adirondack Region of New York. Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  46. Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.Google Scholar
  47. Teskey R O and Hinckley T M 1981 Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiol. Plant. 52, 363–369.Google Scholar
  48. Van Praag H J, Sougnez-remy S, Weissen F and Carletti G 1988 Root turnover in a beech and a spruce stand of the Belgian Ardennes. Plant and Soil 105, 87–103.Google Scholar
  49. Vogt K A and Bloomfield J 1991. Tree root turnover and senescence.In Plant Roots. Eds Y Waisel, A Eschel and K Uzi. pp 287–306. Dekker, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  50. Vogt K A, Grier CC, Bower S T, Sprugel D G and Vogt D J 1986a Overestimation of net root production: a real or imaginary problem? Ecology 67, 577–579.Google Scholar
  51. Vogt K A, Grier C C, and Vogt D J 1986b Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and below-ground detritus of world forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15, 303–377.Google Scholar
  52. Vogt K A and Persson H 1990 Measuring growth and development of roots.In Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology. Eds. J P Lassoie and T M Hinckley. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  53. Webb D P 1976 Root growth inAcer saccharum March. seedlings: effects of light intensity and photoperiod on root elongation rates. Bot. Gaz. 137, 211–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianne K. Burke
    • 1
  • Dudley J. Raynal
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Southeastern Forest Experiment StationUSDA Forest ServiceCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations