Zeitschrift für Physik A Atoms and Nuclei

, Volume 302, Issue 3, pp 261–270 | Cite as

Fragmentation of12C nuclei in emulsion at 50 GeV/c

  • A. El-Naghy
Nuclei

Abstract

A total of 85212C-emulsion nucleus interactions at 4.2 GeV/c per incident nucleon was investigated. At least one charged projectile fragment was observed in 733 events, in which the multiplicity and angular distributions ofZ=1,2, and ≧3 projectile fragments were studied. Five events were observed in which12C projectile nuclei were fragmented into twoZ=3 fragments. Thus the cross section of this process is about 6×10−3 of the inelastic cross section. The angular distribution of projectile fragments becomes narrower as the fragment charge increases. At all values of fragment charges, a pronounced peak in the angular distribution can be observed at zero emission angle. In this paper, only the projectile-fragmentation events possessing no heavily ionizing particle (n h =0 events) have been investigated. Our sample contains 84 of these events, i.e., about 10% of the total inelastic events. The number of events withZmax, the charge of the emitted principal fragment, equal to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are 11, 52, 13, 4, and 4, respectively. Of these 84 events, 36 interactions have a total charge of emitted projectile fragmentsZ* equal to 6, i.e., as much as the beam chargeZ p . Of the 36 events, 17 produce no charged pions and of the 17 events, 10 only represent the dissociation of12C→3α, i.e., 1.2% of the total inelastic interactions. The number of events withZ*=5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 are 27, 14, 4, 2, and 1, respectively. The average number of produced charged pions per one interacting projectile nucleon was estimated to be 1.2±0.1. This value agrees with the corresponding one in elementary interaction at the same energy per nucleon, a result pertaining to the incoherent production model in collision of two nuclei. In this class of events,n h =0, the number of stars in which H, He, Li, Be, and B isotopes were detected are 59, 58, 13, 4, and 4, respectively. The projected angular distributions ofZ=1 and 2 projectile fragments are Gaussian shaped, narrow, consistent with isotropy, and depend on the fragment. These distributions are consistent with quantum mechanical calculations using the sudden approximation and shell-model functions. From the angular measurements ofα-particle tracks in the dissociation12C→3α events, the distribution ofα-particle transverse momentum inside the carbon projectile nucleus was deduced. It seems that the dissociation of12C→3α happens via an intermediate8Be state.

Keywords

Angular Distribution Transverse Momentum Quantum Mechanical Calculation Charged Pion Inelastic Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frier, P., Lofgren, E.J., Ney, E.P., Oppenheimer, F., Brandt, H.L., Peters, B.: Phys. Rev.74, 213 (1948)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waddington, C.J.: Prog. Nucl. Phys.8, 1 (1960)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lohrmann, E., Teucher, M.W.: Phys. Rev.115, 639 (1959)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jain, P.L., Lohrmann, E., Teucher, M.W.: Phys. Rev.115, 643 (1959)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rybicki, K.: Nuovo Cimento,28, 1437 (1963)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rybicki, K.: Acta Phys. Polonica36, 69 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wosiek, B.: Acta Phys. Polonica B9, 191 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vernov, S.N., Grigorov, N.L., Chudakov, A.E.: Yad. Fiz.28, 1021 (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaisser, T.K.: J. Franklin Inst.298, 271 (1974)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grieder, P.K.F.: Riv. Nuovo Cimento,7, 1 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCusker, C.B.A.: Phys. Rep.20C, 59 (1975)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Naghy, A., Toneev, V.D.: Z. Phys. A — Atoms and Nuclei298, 55 (1980)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    El-Naghy, A.: Frascati Report LNF-81/3 (1981), submitted to Nuovo Cimento.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heckman, H.H., Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Bieser, F.S.: Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 926 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Heckman, H.H., Cork, B., Bieser, F.S.: Phys. Rev. Letters35, 152 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lindstrom, P.J., Greiner, D.E., Heckman, H.H., Cork, B., Bieser, F.S.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-3650 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heckman, H.H., Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Shwe, H.: Phys. Rev. C17, 1735 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bucharest-Dubna-Kosice-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Warsaw Collaboration: Dubna Preprint JINR, El-10838, (1977)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bradt, H.L., Peters, B.: Phys. Rev.77, 54 (1950)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karol, P.J.: Phys. Rev. C11, 1203 (1975)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bucharest-Dubna-Kosice-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Warsaw Collaboration: Dubna Preprints JINR, Pl-6877, (1972); JINR, Pl-8313, (1974)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chernov, G.M., Gulamov, K.G., Gulyamov, U.G., Nasyrov, S.Z., Svechnikova, L.N.: Nucl. Phys. A280, 478 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bialas, A., Bleszynski, M., Czyz, W.: Nucl. Phys. B111, 461 (1976)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lepore, J.V., Riddell, R.J.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-3086, (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. El-Naghy
    • 1
  1. 1.INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di FrascatiItaly

Personalised recommendations