Fragmentation of12C nuclei in emulsion at 50 GeV/c
- 17 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
A total of 85212C-emulsion nucleus interactions at 4.2 GeV/c per incident nucleon was investigated. At least one charged projectile fragment was observed in 733 events, in which the multiplicity and angular distributions ofZ=1,2, and ≧3 projectile fragments were studied. Five events were observed in which12C projectile nuclei were fragmented into twoZ=3 fragments. Thus the cross section of this process is about 6×10−3 of the inelastic cross section. The angular distribution of projectile fragments becomes narrower as the fragment charge increases. At all values of fragment charges, a pronounced peak in the angular distribution can be observed at zero emission angle. In this paper, only the projectile-fragmentation events possessing no heavily ionizing particle (n h =0 events) have been investigated. Our sample contains 84 of these events, i.e., about 10% of the total inelastic events. The number of events withZmax, the charge of the emitted principal fragment, equal to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are 11, 52, 13, 4, and 4, respectively. Of these 84 events, 36 interactions have a total charge of emitted projectile fragmentsZ* equal to 6, i.e., as much as the beam chargeZ p . Of the 36 events, 17 produce no charged pions and of the 17 events, 10 only represent the dissociation of12C→3α, i.e., 1.2% of the total inelastic interactions. The number of events withZ*=5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 are 27, 14, 4, 2, and 1, respectively. The average number of produced charged pions per one interacting projectile nucleon was estimated to be 1.2±0.1. This value agrees with the corresponding one in elementary interaction at the same energy per nucleon, a result pertaining to the incoherent production model in collision of two nuclei. In this class of events,n h =0, the number of stars in which H, He, Li, Be, and B isotopes were detected are 59, 58, 13, 4, and 4, respectively. The projected angular distributions ofZ=1 and 2 projectile fragments are Gaussian shaped, narrow, consistent with isotropy, and depend on the fragment. These distributions are consistent with quantum mechanical calculations using the sudden approximation and shell-model functions. From the angular measurements ofα-particle tracks in the dissociation12C→3α events, the distribution ofα-particle transverse momentum inside the carbon projectile nucleus was deduced. It seems that the dissociation of12C→3α happens via an intermediate8Be state.
Keywords
Angular Distribution Transverse Momentum Quantum Mechanical Calculation Charged Pion Inelastic Cross SectionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Frier, P., Lofgren, E.J., Ney, E.P., Oppenheimer, F., Brandt, H.L., Peters, B.: Phys. Rev.74, 213 (1948)Google Scholar
- 2.Waddington, C.J.: Prog. Nucl. Phys.8, 1 (1960)Google Scholar
- 3.Lohrmann, E., Teucher, M.W.: Phys. Rev.115, 639 (1959)Google Scholar
- 4.Jain, P.L., Lohrmann, E., Teucher, M.W.: Phys. Rev.115, 643 (1959)Google Scholar
- 5.Rybicki, K.: Nuovo Cimento,28, 1437 (1963)Google Scholar
- 6.Rybicki, K.: Acta Phys. Polonica36, 69 (1969)Google Scholar
- 7.Wosiek, B.: Acta Phys. Polonica B9, 191 (1978)Google Scholar
- 8.Vernov, S.N., Grigorov, N.L., Chudakov, A.E.: Yad. Fiz.28, 1021 (1978)Google Scholar
- 9.Gaisser, T.K.: J. Franklin Inst.298, 271 (1974)Google Scholar
- 10.Grieder, P.K.F.: Riv. Nuovo Cimento,7, 1 (1977)Google Scholar
- 11.McCusker, C.B.A.: Phys. Rep.20C, 59 (1975)Google Scholar
- 12.El-Naghy, A., Toneev, V.D.: Z. Phys. A — Atoms and Nuclei298, 55 (1980)Google Scholar
- 13.El-Naghy, A.: Frascati Report LNF-81/3 (1981), submitted to Nuovo Cimento.Google Scholar
- 14.Heckman, H.H., Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Bieser, F.S.: Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 926 (1972)Google Scholar
- 15.Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Heckman, H.H., Cork, B., Bieser, F.S.: Phys. Rev. Letters35, 152 (1975)Google Scholar
- 16.Lindstrom, P.J., Greiner, D.E., Heckman, H.H., Cork, B., Bieser, F.S.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-3650 (1975)Google Scholar
- 17.Heckman, H.H., Greiner, D.E., Lindstrom, P.J., Shwe, H.: Phys. Rev. C17, 1735 (1978)Google Scholar
- 18.Bucharest-Dubna-Kosice-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Warsaw Collaboration: Dubna Preprint JINR, El-10838, (1977)Google Scholar
- 19.Bradt, H.L., Peters, B.: Phys. Rev.77, 54 (1950)Google Scholar
- 20.Karol, P.J.: Phys. Rev. C11, 1203 (1975)Google Scholar
- 21.Bucharest-Dubna-Kosice-Leningrad-Moscow-Tashkent-Warsaw Collaboration: Dubna Preprints JINR, Pl-6877, (1972); JINR, Pl-8313, (1974)Google Scholar
- 22.Chernov, G.M., Gulamov, K.G., Gulyamov, U.G., Nasyrov, S.Z., Svechnikova, L.N.: Nucl. Phys. A280, 478 (1977)Google Scholar
- 23.Bialas, A., Bleszynski, M., Czyz, W.: Nucl. Phys. B111, 461 (1976)Google Scholar
- 24.Lepore, J.V., Riddell, R.J.: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-3086, (1974)Google Scholar