Zeitschrift für Operations Research

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 115–120 | Cite as

Note on an alternative solution of Kamien-Schwartz's limit pricing problem

  • Karl-Walter Küpper
  • Johann Walter
Articles
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The present authors found Kamien-Schwartz's (Ref. 1) theory of limit pricing with infinite planning horizon interesting mainly because of a certain disproportion between the rather simplelooking result, viz., constancy of the optimal price strategy, and its comparatively difficult proof, viz., use of Pontryagin's Maximum Principle (PMP) which in the infinite horizon case is encumbered by the additional difficulty of not leading to a uniquely solvable system of necessary conditions. Quite in consonance with Arrow's opinion referred to in Takayama (Ref. 2, p. 446) that sometimes “the infinite horizon formulation is more convenient and revealing” than the finite one, it turned out that in this special case the original optimization problem could be replaced by a much simpler one and, therefore, the use of PMP avoided.

Key words

Pontryagin's maximum principle infinite planning horizon transversality conditions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1971) Limit pricing and uncertain entry. Econometrica 39:441–455Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takayama A (1985) Mathematical economics, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Debreu G (1986) Theoretic models: Mathematical form and economic content. Frisch Memorial Lecture delivered at the Fifth World Congress of the Economic Society held at MIT 17-24 1985. Econometrica 54:1259–1270Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kamien MI, Muller E (1986) Characterization of constant policies in optimal control. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 48:315–324Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halkin H (1974) Necessary conditions for optimal control problems with infinite horizons. Econometrica 42:267–272Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamien MI, Schwartz NL (1981) Dynamic optimization. North Holland New York-OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kemp MC, Ohta H (1978) The optimal level of exports under threat of foreign import restriction. Canadian Journal of Economics 11:720–725Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dantzig GB (1984) Reminiscences about the origin of linear programming. In: Schlissel A (ed) Essays in the history of mathematics. Memoirs of the AMS Vol 48, Nr 298Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Küpper KW, Walter J (1988) Ein Modell der optimalen Preispolitik. Institut für Mathematik der RWTH AachenGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bluman GW, Cole JD (1974) Similarity methods for differential equations. Springer-Verlag New York Heidelberg TokyoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fershtman C (1987) Identification of classes of differential games for which the open loop is a degenerate feedback Nash equilibrium. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 55:217–231Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walter J (1994) Review of “Extrema of smooth functions. With examples from economic theory” by M. EL-Hodiri. ZOR 39:123–130Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl-Walter Küpper
    • 1
  • Johann Walter
    • 2
  1. 1.AachenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für MathematikRWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations