Assessment of sheet-metal bending requirements using neural networks
- 90 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The springback behaviour of a sheet-metal is dependent on the properties of the metal and the bending conditions, namely the thickness of the sheet-metal, geometry of the tooling and the amount of force used for bending. Sheet-metal component manufacturing often requires near zero springback angle to obtain the correct shape of the product. An attempt has been made to model the non-linear relation between properties of the metal, the springback angle, geometry of the tooling and the bending force applied. Multilayer perceptron neural networks with a backpropagation learning algorithm were used to model the bending process. One set of data from bending experiments in a laboratory environment was used to train the networks. The networks were tested with the remaining set of experimental results. Then, the neural networks were used to predict the forces required for a number of bending experiments to achieve a zero springback angle. Validation of the neural network predictions was performed by trying to apply the predicted amounts of bending force in the physical experiments. The springback angles achieved were within ±1 degree, which is an acceptable range for the work. The research clearly demonstrates the applicability of neural networks to modelling the sheet-metal bending process.
Keywords
Automation Bending Forming Modelling Neural networks Sheet-metal Springback systemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Lange K. Handbook of Metal Forming. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985; 19.1–19.51Google Scholar
- 2.Ludwik P. Engineering Study of Sheet Bending. Technische Blatter, no. 35, Prag, Verlag des Deutschen Polytechnischen Vereins in Bohmen, 1903; 133–159 (in German)Google Scholar
- 3.Oehler G. Bending. Muchen, Hanser, 1963 (in German)Google Scholar
- 4.Gossard DC, Allison BT. Adaptive brake forming. Proc 8th North American Manufacturing Res Conf. Rolla, MO 1980; 252–256Google Scholar
- 5.Geiger M, Vollertsen F. The mechanisms of laser forming. CIRP Annals 1993; 42(1): 301–304Google Scholar
- 6.Vollertsen F. An analytical model for laser bending. Lasers in Eng 1994; 2: 261–276Google Scholar
- 7.Lippmann RP. An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag April 1987: 4–22Google Scholar
- 8.Winston PH. Arificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1992; 443–457Google Scholar
- 9.Roy R, Cave P, Parmee IC. Artificial neural networks and Taguchi's methodology to model a complex non-linear system. Pro ACEDC'94. 21–22 September 1994, Plymouth, UK; 114–116Google Scholar
- 10.Roy R, Balendra R. Neural networks to adapt shearing process control for material variance. Proc CAPE-10, Palermo, Italy, 1994; 23–29Google Scholar
- 11.Roy R, Chodnikiewicz K, Balendra R. Interpolation of forging preform shapes using neural networks. J Materials Processing Technology, 1994; 45: 695–702Google Scholar
- 12.Users' Manual, NeuralWorks Professional II Plus, Ver. 4.0, NeuralWare Inc., 1991Google Scholar