Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 138, Issue 7, pp 824–828 | Cite as

Is the outcome of traditional lumbar disc surgery related to the size of the exposure?

  • V. Graver
  • A. E. Ljunggren
  • B. Magnæs
  • M. Loeb
  • H. Lie
Clinical Articles

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether wide surgical exposures result in poorer outcome of lumbar disc surgery compared to smaller traditional exposures. The aim was also to assess if a dural tear has any impact on the postoperative clinical outcome. One hundred and twenty-two patients (56 women and 66 men, mean age 40.8 years) with herniated intervertebral lumbar disc and no previous back surgery, were included. Postoperatively they were grouped according to surgery as follows: surgery on one vs. two herniated discs (106 vs. 16 patients), partial vs. full laminectomy (93 vs. 29 patients), and the occurrence or not of a dural rent (8 vs. 114 patients). The outcome of surgery was evaluated one year postoperatively mainly by a composite clinical overall score (COS) and by its separate elements, which were: pain intensity in the lower-back or leg (VAS), neurological and clinical examination, functional capacity (Oswestry), and the need for analgesics. The results of the statistical regression analyses did not reveal significant differences in the postoperative outcome scores in the various groups of patients. The groups were comparable; no significant differences were seen in the pre-operative clinical overall scores.

Keywords

Traditional lumbar disc surgery dural tear outcome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui J, Bjørnsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3: 205–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benini A (1989) Lumbale Diskektomie ohne oder mit Spondylodese? Revival eines alten Dilemmas. Z Orthop (Stuttg) 127: 276–285Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bryce KA, Weir MD (1979) Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurg 50: 283–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bundschuh CV, Modic MT, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Bohlman H (1988) Epidural fibrosis and recurrent disc herniation in the lumbar spine: MR Imaging assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9: 169–178Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burton CV, Kirkaldy Willis WH, Yong-Hing K, Heithoff KB (1981) Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 157: 191–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll SE, Wiesel SW (1992) Neurologic complications and lumbar laminectomy. Clin Orthop 284: 14–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper RG, Mitchell WS, Illingworth KJ, Clair Forbes WST, Gillespie JE, Jayson MIV (1991) The role of epidural fibrosis and defective fibrinolysis in the persistence of postlaminectomy back pain. Spine 16: 1044–1048PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De la Porte C, Siegfried J (1983) Lumbosacral spinal fibrosis (Spinal arachnoiditis). Its diagnosis and treatment by spinal cord stimulation. Spine 8: 593–603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66: 271–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glickstein MF, Sussman SK (1991) Time-dependent scar enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine. Skeletal Radiol 20: 333–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graver V, Ljunggren AE, Malt UE, Loeb M, Haaland AK, Magnæs B, Lie H (1995) Can psychological traits predict the outcome of lumbar disc surgery when anamnestic and physiological risk factors are controlled for? Results of a prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Res: 39: 465–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagen R, Engesæter LB (1977) Unilateral and bilateral partial laminectomy in lumbar disc prolapse. A follow-up study of 156 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48: 41–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haaland AK, Graver V, Ljunggren AE, Loeb M, Lie H, Magnas B, Godal HC (1992) Fibrinolytic activity as a predictor of the outcome of prolapsed intervertebral lumbar disc surgery with reference to background variables: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine 17: 1022–1027PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR, Wilber RG, Bohlman HH, Steinberg PM, Delamarter RB (1988) Lumbar spine: postoperatives MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167: 817–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iida Y, Kataoka O, Sho T, Hirose T, Bessho Y, Kobayashi D (1990) Postoperative lumbar spinal instability occurring or progressing secondary to laminectomy. Spine 15: 1186–1189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jayson MIV (1987) Chronic inflammation and fibrosis in back pain syndrome. In: Jayson MIV (ed) The lumbar spine and back pain, 3rd Ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 411–418Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Markwalder TM, Battaglia M (1993) Failed back surgery syndrome. Part I: analysis of the clinical presentation and results of testing procedures for instability of the lumbar spine in 171 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 123: 46–51Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mixter WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. New Engl J Med 211: 210–215Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oppel U, Beyer HK, Fett H, Hedtmann A (1989) Magnetic resonance tomography studies with contrast media in post-discotomy syndrome. Orthopäde 18: 41–52Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pountain GD, Keegan AL, Jayson MIV (1987) Impaired fibrinolytic activity in defined chronic back pain syndromes. Spine 12: 83–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruggieri F, Specchia L, Sabalat S, Galli G, Ruggieri P, Arlecchini S (1988) Lumbar disc herniation: diagnoses, surgical treatment, recurrence. A review of 872 operated cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 14: 15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spangfort EV (1972) The lumbar disc herniation. A computeraided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand 142 [Suppl]: 1–95Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steiner H (1989) MR tomography following lumbar disk surgery: differential diagnostic potentials using Gd-DTPA. ROFO Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 151: 179–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tilscher H, Hanna M (1990) Causes of poor results of surgery in low back pain. J Manual Medicine 5: 110–114Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8: 131–140PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Graver
    • 1
  • A. E. Ljunggren
    • 2
  • B. Magnæs
    • 3
  • M. Loeb
    • 4
  • H. Lie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUllevaal University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Research ForumUllevaal University HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryUllevaal University HospitalOsloNorway
  4. 4.Medical Statistics InstituteUllevaal University HospitalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations