Colloid and Polymer Science

, Volume 264, Issue 12, pp 1005–1009 | Cite as

Zeta potential and surface charge density of polystyrene-latex; comparison with synaptic vesicle and brush border membrane vesicle

  • K. Ohsawa
  • M. Murata
  • H. Ohshima
Polymer Science

Abstract

The electrophoretic mobility of polystyrene — latex (PSL) of diameter 870 Å was determined using a Laser Zee System 3000. This instrument enables automatic measurement of the electrophoretic mobility of fine particles. Effect of pH and ionic strengthI on the PSL mobility was analyzed. It was found that the mobility as a function of pH has a minimum around pH 3–4 atI=0.1, showing no isoelectric point, and that the mobility decreases with increasing ionic strength up toI=0.1 but is almost constant forI=0.1–0.2 at pH=7.34. From the mobility date, we estimated the zeta potentialζ of PSL. We used an approximate mobility formula derived by Ohshima, Healy and White, which is considerably more accurate than Smolchowski's and Henry's formula and is applicable for fine particles with smallχ a (χ a≳10), whereχ is the Debye-Hückel parameter anda is the particle radius. Further, we calculated the surface charge densityσ of PSL using an approximateσζ relationship. It was found that there are 2000–4000 negative charges on the PSL surface at pH=7.34. Comparison is made with the results on synaptic vesicles (SV) from brain cerebrum cortex and brush-border-membrane vesicles (BBMV) from the small intestine.

Key words

Zeta potential surface charge density polystyrene latex synaptic vesicle brush border membrane 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Overbeek JThG, Bijsterbosch BH (1979) Righetti PG, Van Oss CJ, Vanderhoff JW (eds) Electrokinetic Separation Methods, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preece AW, Sabolovic D (eds) (1979) Cell Electrophoresis Clinical Application and Methodology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 364–461Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ohsawa K, Ohshima H, Ohki S (1981) Biochim Biophys Acta 648:206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ohsawa K, Ohshima H (1984) Electrophoresis 5:148Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohsawa K, Kano A, Hoshi T (1979) Life Sci 24:669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ohshima H, Healy TW, White LR (1983) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 2 79:1613Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohshima H, Healy TW, White LR (1982)JColl Interf Sci 90:17Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smoluchowski M von (1918) Z Phys Chem 92:129Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Henry DC (1931) Proc R Soc London Ser A 133:106Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CRC Handbook of Chem and Phys (1969) Chemical Rubber Co LtdGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaw JN (1969) J Polym Sic Part C 27:237Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brethers R, personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chibowski E (1979) J Coll Interf Sci 69:540Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steinkopff 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Ohsawa
    • 1
  • M. Murata
    • 2
  • H. Ohshima
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Central Scientific CommerceInc. TokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biophysical ScienceState University of New York at BuffaloNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations