Numerische Mathematik

, Volume 56, Issue 2–3, pp 157–177

# Algebraic multilevel preconditioning methods. I

• O. Axclsson
• P. S. Vassilevski
Article

## Summary

A recursive way of constructing preconditioning matrices for the stiffness matrix in the discretization of selfadjoint second order elliptic boundary value problems is proposed. It is based on a sequence of nested finite element spaces with the usual nodal basis functions. Using a nodeordering corresponding to the nested meshes, the finite element stiffness matrix is recursively split up into two-level block structures and is factored approximately in such a way that any successive Schur complement is replaced (approximated) by a matrix defined recursively and thereform only implicitely given. To solve a system with this matrix we need to perform a fixed number (v) of iterations on the preceding level using as an iteration matrix the preconditioning matrix already defined on that level. It is shown that by a proper choice of iteration parameters it suffices to use$$v > \left( {1 - \gamma ^2 } \right)^{ - \tfrac{1}{2}}$$ iterations for the so constructedv-foldV-cycle (wherev=2 corresponds to aW-cycle) preconditioning matrices to be spectrally equivalent to the stiffness matrix. The conditions involve only the constant λ in the strengthened C.-B.-S. inequality for the corresponding two-level hierarchical basis function spaces and are therefore independent of the regularity of the solution for instance. If we use successive uniform refinements of the meshes the method is of optimal order of computational complexity, if$$\gamma ^2< \tfrac{8}{9}$$. Under reasonable assumptions of the finite element mesh, the condition numbers turn out to be so small that there are in practice few reasons to use an accelerated iterative method like the conjugate gradient method, for instance.

### Subject Classifications

AMS(MOS): 65F10 65N20 65N30 CR: G1.3

## Preview

### References

1. 1.
Axelsson, O., Barker, V.A.: Finite element solution of boundary value problems. 1st Ed. New York: Academic Press 1984Google Scholar
2. 2.
Axelsson, O., Gustafsson, I.: Preconditioning and two-level multigrid methods of arbitrary degree of approximation. Math. Comput.40, 219–242 (1983)Google Scholar
3. 3.
Axelsson, O.: On multigrid methods of the two-level type. In: Hackbusch, W., Trottenberg, U. (eds.) Multigrid methods, Proceedings, Köln-Porz 1981, pp. 352–367. LNM 960, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1982Google Scholar
4. 4.
Bank, R., Dupont, T.: Analysis of a two-level scheme for solving finite element equations, Report CNA-159, Center for Numerical Analysis, The University of Texas at Austin 1980Google Scholar
5. 5.
Bank, R., Dupont, T.: An optimal order process for solving finite element equations. Math. Comput.36, 35–51 (1981)Google Scholar
6. 6.
Bank, R., Dupont, T., Yserentant, H.: The hierarchical basis multigrid method. Numer. Math.52, 427–458 (1988)Google Scholar
7. 7.
Braess, D.: The contraction number of a multigrid method for solving the Poisson equation. Numer. Math.37, 387–404 (1981)Google Scholar
8. 8.
Braess, D.: The convergence rate of a multigrid method with Gauss-Seidel relaxation for the Poisson equation. In: Hackbusch, W., Trottenberg, U. (eds.) Multigrid methods, Proceedings, Köln-Porz 1981, pp. 368–386. LNM 960, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1982Google Scholar
9. 9.
Braess, D., Hackbusch, W.: A new convergence proff for the multigrid method including theV-cycle. SIAM J. Numer. Anal20, 967–975 (1983)Google Scholar
10. 10.
George, A., Liu, J.W.: Computer solution of large sparse positive definite systems, 1st Ed. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall 1984Google Scholar
11. 11.
Kuznetsov, Y.A.: Multigrid domain decomposition methods for elliptic problems, talk presented at the conference on Numerical Linear Algebra and Parallel Computation, Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut, Oberwolfach, Febr. 28-March 5 (1988)Google Scholar
12. 12.
Maitre, J.F., Musy, F.: The contraction number of a class of two-level methods; an exact evaluation for some finite element subspaces and model problems. In: Hackbusch, W., Trottenberg, U. (eds.) Multigrid methods, Proceedings, Köln-Porz 1981, pp. 535–544. LNM 960, Springer, 1982Google Scholar
13. 13.
Vassilevski, P.: Nearly optimal iterative methods for solving finite element equations based on multilevel splitting of the matrix 1987 (submitted)Google Scholar
14. 14.
Yserentant, H.: On the multilevel splitting of finite element spaces. Numer. Math.49, 379–412 (1986)Google Scholar