Cross-national perspectives on the role of assessment in counselling: A preliminary report

  • Lorraine Wilgosh
  • Janice T. Gibson
Articles
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

This preliminary report examines the role of formal assessment in the counselling process from a cross-national perspective. Counsellors and counsellor-educators from twenty countries were surveyed to determine the extent to which they use formal assessment procedures in counselling and the types of assessment instruments being used. Results indicated that many, but not all, counsellors use assessment instruments. In non-North American countries, there is some tendency to use instruments developed in the North American context, with or without modifications to test content and norms. This preliminary study suggests a perceived need for development of culture-specific assessment tools, and the implications for counsellor training of developing counselling and assessment skills with cross-cultural relevance.

Keywords

Assessment Tool Preliminary Report Formal Assessment Assessment Instrument Assessment Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baine, D. (1988).Handicapped children in developing countries: Assessment, curriculum and instruction. Edmonton, AB: Vector.Google Scholar
  2. Chodzinski, R. & Samuda, R. (1985). A training model for implementing nonbiased assessment procedures. In: R. Samuda & A. Wolfgang (Eds.),Intercultural counselling and assessment: Global perspectives (pp. 343–353). Toronto, ON: C.J. Hogrefe, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Day, R., Nielsen, J., Korten, A., Ernberg, G., Dube, K., Gebhart, J., Jablensky, A., Leon, C., Marsella, A., Olatawura, M., Sartorius, N., Stromgren, E., Takahashi, R., Wig, N. & Wynne, L. (1987). Stressful life events preceding the acute onset of schizophrenia: A cross-national study from the World Health Organization.Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry 11: 123–205.Google Scholar
  4. Frijda, N. & Jahoda, G. (1966). On the scope and methods of cross-cultural research.International Journal of Psychology 1: 109–127.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson, J. & Chandler, L. (1988).Educational psychology: Mastering principles and applications. Needham, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Herr, E. (1985). International approaches to career counselling and guidance. In: P. Pedersen (Ed.),Handbook of cross-cultural counseling and therapy (pp. 3–9). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  7. Ibrahim, F. (1985). Effective cross-cultural counseling and psychotherapy: A framework.The Counseling Psychologist 13: 625–638.Google Scholar
  8. Irvine, S. (1985). What does research have to say about the testing of minorities. In: R. Samuda & A. Wolfgang (Eds.),Intercultural counselling and assessment: Global perspectives (pp. 165–176). Toronto, ON: C.J. Hogrefe, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Kuo, S. & Spees, E. (1983). Chinese-American student life styles: A comparative study.Journal of College Student Personnel 24: 111–117.Google Scholar
  10. Lonner, W. (1985). Issues in testing and assessment in cross-cultural counseling.The Counseling Psychologist 13: 599–614.Google Scholar
  11. Padilla, A. & Salgado de Snyder, N. (1985). Counseling Hispanics: Strategies for effective intervention. In: P. Pedersen (Ed.),Handbook of cross-cultural counseling and therapy (pp. 157–164). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  12. Pedersen, P. (1985). Intercultural criteria for mental-health training. In: P. Pedersen (Ed.),Handbook of cross-cultural counseling and therapy (pp. 315–321). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  13. Robins, L., Wing, J., Wittchen, H., Helzer, J., Babor, T., Burke, J., Farmer, A., Jablenski, A., Pickens, R., Reiger, D., Sartorius, N. & Towle, L. (1988). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview.Archives of General Psychiatry 45: 1069–1077.Google Scholar
  14. Saeki, C. & Borow, H. (1985). Counseling and psychotherapy: East and West. In: P. Pedersen (Ed.),Handbook of cross-cultural counseling and therapy (pp. 223–229). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  15. Samuda, R. (1985). Current methods in the assessment of minorities: A critique. In: R. Samuda & A. Wolfgang (Eds.),Intercultural counselling and assessment: Global perspectives (pp. 127–140). Toronto, ON: C.J. Hogrefe, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, K. (1987).The relationship between culture and stress: A comparison of Chinese, Saudi Arabian and American students' perceptions regarding problems in living, coping behavior and the effectiveness of coping. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  17. Sue, D. & Kirk, B. (1975). Asian-Americans: Use of counseling and psychiatric services on a college campus.Journal of Counseling Psychology 22: 84–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorraine Wilgosh
    • 1
  • Janice T. Gibson
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations