Gender and attitudes toward work

  • Alicja Maurer
  • Barbara Oszustowicz
  • Ryszard Stocki


This paper presents some differences between men and women regarding their attitudes to work and the implications of those attitudes regarding counselling. The subjects were 300 Polish students (150 men and 150 women) and 306 German students. The study is part of a larger collaborative research program conducted in 43 countries by Lynn (1991). The results are presented against the background of Weber's (1929) Protestant work ethic, Schumpeter's (1934) theory of competitiveness, McClelland's (1976) theory of achievement motivation, and Wiener's (1981) theory of low valuation of business.

All of these theories seek to show the relationship and influence of the psychology of the individual, as that is manifested in attitude, on the economic growth of a nation. The results of the present study support Wiener's theory that the “social status” of business occupations play an important role in the growth of economies. They also reveal that men are generally more concerned than women, with the attitudes, and values, that are considered as a motive power of economic growth.


Economic Growth Research Program Social Status Collaborative Research Motive Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmed, S.U. (1985). N. Ach, risk-taking propensity, locus of control and entrepreneurship.Personality and Individual Differences 6: 781–782.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, O.F., Moore, D.G. & Unwalla, D.B. (1964).The Enterprising Man. East Lansing: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Furnham, A. (1984). Many sides of coin: the psychology of money usage.Personality and Individual Differences 5: 501–509.Google Scholar
  4. Lynn, R. (1969). An achievement motivation questionnaire.British Journal of Psychology 60: 526–534.Google Scholar
  5. Lynn, R. (1991).The secret of the miracle economy: Different national attitudes to competitiveness and money. The social Affairs Unit. Croley Esmonde Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. McClelland, D.C. (1976).The achieving society. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  7. Ray, J.J. (1979). A quick measure of achievement motivation — validation in Australian and reliable in Britain and South Africa.Australian Psychologist 14: 337–345.Google Scholar
  8. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934).The theory of economic development. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Spence, J.A. & Helmreich, R.L. (1983). Achievement related motives and behavior. In: J.T. Spence (ed)Achievement and Achievement Motives. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  10. Weber, M. (1929).The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  11. Wiener, M.J. (1981).English culture and the decline of the industrial sprit, 1985–1980. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Yamauclii, K.T, Templer, D.I. (1982). The development of money attitude scale.Journal of Personality Assessment 46: 522–528.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alicja Maurer
    • 1
  • Barbara Oszustowicz
    • 1
  • Ryszard Stocki
    • 2
  1. 1.Pedagogical UniversityCracowPoland
  2. 2.Jagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations