Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 129, Issue 1–2, pp 11–14 | Cite as

Role of skull radiography in the initial evaluation of minor head injury: A retrospective study

  • W. R. Murshid
Clinical Articles

Summary

The use of skull radiography in the initial evaluation of minor head injured patients is controversial. In an attempt to evaluate its benefits, a retrospective study of 566 cases subjected to skull radiography following close minor head trauma (Glasgow Coma Scale 13–15), is presented.

A skull fracture (linear vault, depressed or base of skull) was present in 64 (11%) cases. Only three (5%) who were found to have a skull fracture on skull radiography developed an intracranial injury which required surgery.

Intracranial injuries developed in 19 (3%) cases and were followed by surgery in six (32%). All, except for one case, had a decreased level of consciousness and a Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15, few had focal neurological deficits. Management had not been altered by the results of skull radiography in any of the cases.

We concluded that skull radiographs are unnecessary for the decision process in closed minor head injury because management decisions are based primarily on a careful neurological examination. When intracranial injuries are a concern, a CT scan should be obtained.

Keywords

Head injury skull fracture skull radiography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Briggs M, Clarke P, Crockard A,et al (1984) Guidelines for initial management after head injury in adults. Suggestions from a group of neurosurgeons. BMJ 288: 983–985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell RS, Loop JW (1971) The utility and futility of radiographic skull examination for trauma. N Engl J Med 284: 236–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper PR, Ho V (1983) Role of emergency skull X-ray films in the evaluation of the head-injured patient: a retrospective study. Neurosurgery 13: 136–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dacey RG, Alives WM, Rimel RW, Winn R, Jane JA (1986) Neurosurgical complications after apparently minor head injury. J Neurosurgery 65: 203–210Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feuerman T, Wackym PA, Gade GF, Becker DP (1988) Value of skull radiography, head computed tomographic scanning, and admission for observation in cases of minor head injury. Neurosurgery 22: 449–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jennett B (1980) Skull X-rays after recent head injury. Clin Radiol 31: 463–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendelow AD, Campbell DA, Jeffrey RR, Miller JD, Hessett C, Bryden J, Jennett B (1982) Admission after mild head injury: Benefits and costs. BMJ 285: 1530–1532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Masters SJ, McClean PM, Arcarese JS,et al (1987) Skull X-ray examinations after head trauma. N Engl J Med 316: 84–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Royal College of Radiologists (eds) (1981) Costs and benefits of skull radiography for head injury. A national study. Lancet ii: 791–795Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Royal College of Radiologists (eds) (1983) Patient selection for skull radiography in uncomplicated head injury. A national study. Lancet i: 115–118Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips LA (1979) Emergency services utilization of skull radiography. Neurosurgery 4: 580–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenthal BW, Bergman I (1989) Intracranial injury after moderate head trauma in children. J Pediatr 115: 346–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vollmer DG, Dacey RG (1991) The management of mild and moderate head injuries. Neurosurg Clin North Am 2: 437–455Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Gennarelli T (1978) Computed tomography of shearing injuries of the cerebral white matter. Radiology 127: 393–396PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. R. Murshid
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgery Division, Department of SurgeryKing Khalid University HospitalRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations