Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 117, Issue 3–4, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Clinical outcome and cognitive impairment in patients with severe head injuries treated with barbiturate coma

  • W. Schalén
  • B. Sonesson
  • K. Messeter
  • G. Nordström
  • C. -H. Nordström
Clinical Articles

Summary

This study reports on clinical outcome in 38 patients with severe head injuries (posttraumatic coma for 6 hours or more) treated with barbiturate coma because of intracranial hypertension. Eighteen patients died, 4 patients remained in a severely disabled or a chronic vegetative state, and 16 patients reached the levels good recovery/ moderate disability. Six of these patients returned to work or school full time, 4 for half time and 3 were in a rehabilitation program. Fourteen patients were subjected to a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. All patients except one exhibited varying degrees of cognitive dysfunction and 6 patients had signs of personality change. The quality of life for the majority of surviving patients was relatively good but the positive effects of barbiturate coma therapy in the age groups over 40 years appeared to be limited.

Keywords

Head injury barbiturate therapy outcome cognitive impairment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benton AL (1974) The revised visual retention test: clinical and experimental applications, 4th Ed. Psychological Corp., New York, pp 1–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bond MR, Brooks DN (1976) Understanding the process of recovery as a basis for the investigation of rehabilitation for the brain injured. Scand J Rehabil Med 8: 127–133Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowers SA, Marshall LF (1980) Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury in San Diego County: a praspective analysis. Neurosurgery 6: 237–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlsson C-A, von Essen C, Löfgren J (1968) Factors effecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. Part 1: Influence of biological factors. Part 2: Significance of posttraumatic coma. J Neurosurg 69: 242–251Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cronholm B, Molander L (1957) Memory disturbances after electroconvulsive therapy. 1. Conditions 6 hours after electroshock treatment. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand 32: 280–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Desantis A, Laiacona M, Barbarotto R, Basso A, Villani R, Spagnoli D, Capitani E (1989) Neuropsychological outcome of patients operated upon for an intracranial aneurysm: analysis of general prognostic factors and of the effects of the location of the aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 1135–1140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dureman I, Kebbon L, Österberg E (1971) A manual to the DS-battery. Psykologiförbundet AB, Stockholm, pp 1–104Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, Marshall LF, Walker MD (1988) High dose barbiturate control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 69: 15–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graham FK, Kendall BS (1960) Memory-for-Design: revised general manual. Percept Mot Skills 11: 147–188Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heiskanen O, Sipponen P (1970) Prognosis of severe brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand 46: 343–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1: 480–484PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jennett B, Teasdale G, Galbraith S, Pickard J, Grant H, Braakman R, Avezaat C, Maas A, Minderhoud J, Vecht CJ, Heiden J, Small R, Caton W, Kurze T (1977) Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40: 291–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levin HS, Goldstein FC, High WM, Eisenberg HM (1988) Disproportionately severe memory deficit in relation to normal intellectual functioning after closed head injury. J Neurol Psychiatry 51: 1294–1301Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, Sullivan HG, Adams WE, Rosner MJ (1977) Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 47: 503–516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narayan RK, Kishore PRS, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP, Da Silva AD, Lipper MH, Choi SC, Mayhall CG, Lutz HA, Young HF (1982) Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? J Neurosurg 56: 650–659PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nordström C-H, Messeter K, Sundbärg G, Wåhlander S (1989) Severe traumatic brain lesions in Sweden. Part 1: Aspects on management in non-neurosurgical clinics. Brain Inj 3: 247–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nordström C-H, Sundbärg G, Messeter K, Schalén W (1989) Severe traumatic brain lesions in Sweden. Part 2: Impact of aggressive neurosurgical intensive care. Brain Inj 3: 267–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D (1985) Social adjustment after closed head injury: a further follow-up seven years after injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 564–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reitan RM (1966) Diagnostic interference of brain lesions based on psychological results. Can Psychol 7: 368–383Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ropper AH, Zervas NT (1984) Outcome 1 year after SAH from cerebral aneurysm. Management morbidity, mortality and functional status in 112 consecutive good-risk patients. J Neurosurg 60: 909–915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schalén W, Messeter K, Nordström C-H (1992) Complications and side effects during thiopentone therapy in patients with severe head injuries. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:369–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shallert T, Hernandez TD, Barth TM (1986) Recovery of function after brain damage: severe and chronic disruption by diazepam. Brain Res 379: 104–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sundbärg G, Norlund A, Nordström C-H, Messeter K (1989) Severe traumatic brain lesions in Sweden. Part 3: Economic aspects of aggressive neurosurgical intensive care. Brain Inj 3: 283–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tabaddor K, Mattis S, Zazula T (1984) Cognitive sequelae and recovery course after moderate and severe head injury. Neurosurgery 14: 701–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tate RL, Lulham JM, Broe GA, Strettles B, Pfaff A (1989) Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury. The results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 52: 1128–1134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomsen IV (1974) The patient with severe head injury and his family. Scand J Rehabil Med 6: 180–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thomsen IV (1984) Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma. A 10–15 year second follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47: 260–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watson CW, Kennard MA (1945) The effect of anticonvulsant drugs on recovery of function following cerebral cortical lesions. J Neurophysiol 8: 221–231Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wechsler D (1958) The measurements and appraisal of adult intelligence. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vilkki J, Holst P, Öhman J, Servo A, Heiskanen O (1989) Cognitive deficits related to computed tomographic findings after surgery for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery 25: 166–172PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Schalén
    • 1
  • B. Sonesson
    • 2
    • 1
  • K. Messeter
    • 3
    • 1
  • G. Nordström
    • 2
    • 1
  • C. -H. Nordström
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of NeurosurgeryUniversity HospitalLundSweden
  2. 2.Departments of PsychiatryUniversity HospitalLundSweden
  3. 3.Departments of AnaesthesiologyUniversity HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations