Advertisement

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 283–307 | Cite as

Reactions to unjust dismissal and third-party dispute resolution: A justice framework

  • Stuart A. Youngblood
  • Linda Klebe Trevino
  • Monica Favia
Articles

Abstract

Little previous research has examined why dismissed workers view their discharge as unjust and how they respond to third-party dispute resolution interventions. This exploratory field study relied upon a justice framework to understand complainant motivations for filing unjust dismissal disputes and their reactions to a voluntary conciliation program. Analysis of archival and interview data suggested that procedural justice principles dominated both motivations for filing claims and reactions to third-party intervention. These findings were consistent with previous justice and labor relations research. Implications for future research, management practice, and third-party dispute resolution are discussed.

Key words

unjust dismissal dispute resolution employment-at-will justice labor relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 267–299, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, S. & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior.Social Justice Research, 1, 177–198.Google Scholar
  4. Aram, J. D., & Salipante, P. F. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict.Academy of Management Review, 6, 197–204.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 296–304.Google Scholar
  6. Balfour, A. (1984). Five types of non-union grievance systems.Personnel, 61, 67.Google Scholar
  7. Bellace, J. (1983). A right of fair dismissal: Enforcing a statutory guarantee.Journal of Law Reform, 16(2), 207–247.Google Scholar
  8. Berenbeim, R. (1980).Nonunion Complaint Systems: A Corporate Appraisal. New York: The Conference Board.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, B. L. (1989).Qualitative Research Methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Bierman, L., Ullman, J. C., & Youngblood, S. A. (1985). Making disputes over dismissals “win-win” situations.Harvard Business Review, January–February, 160–162.Google Scholar
  11. Bierman, L., & Youngblood, S. A. (1985). Employment-at-will and the South Carolina experiment.Industrial Relations Law Journal, 7, 28–59.Google Scholar
  12. Bies, R. J. (1986). Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting. In Bies, R. J. (Chair),Moving Beyond Equity Theory: New Directions on Justice in Organizations. Symposium at the Academy of Management, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, 290–318. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1 43–55. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgment: The influence of causal accounts.Social Justice Research, 1, 199–218.Google Scholar
  16. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.Google Scholar
  17. Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1989). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. (Ed.),Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings, 45–75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Brockner, J., Grover, S., Reed, T., DeWitt, R., & O'Malley, M. (1987). Survivors' reactions to layoffs: We get by with a little help for our friends.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 526–541.Google Scholar
  19. Chamberlain, N. W., & Kuhn, J. W. (1986).Collective Bargaining. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Chaney, W. H. (1981). The reinstatement remedy revisited.Labor Law Journal 32, 357–362.Google Scholar
  21. Coulson, R. (1983). Nature and significance of the problem: General discussion. In Stieber, J., & Blackburn, J. (Eds.),Protecting Unorganized Employees Against Unjust Discharge. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State School of Labor and Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  22. Deutsch, M. (1974). Awakening the sense of injustice. In Lerner, M., & Ross, M. (Eds.),The Quest for Justice: Myth, Reality, Ideal, 19–41, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  23. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–139.Google Scholar
  24. Deutsch, M. (1985).Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dickens, L., Hart, M., Jones, M., & Weekes, B. (1984). The British experience under a statute unfair dismissal.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, 497–514.Google Scholar
  26. Ewing, D. W. (1983).Do It My Way or You're Fired. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Ewing, D. W. (1989).Justice on the Job: Resolving Grievances in the Nonunion workplace. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Farh, J., Podsakoff, P., & Organ, D. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.Journal of Management, 16, 705–721.Google Scholar
  29. Feinberg, J. (1974). Noncomparative justice.The Philosophical Review, July, 297–338.Google Scholar
  30. Finchman, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man to scientists to man to lawyer. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3, 81–138. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 765 p. 2d 373 Cal. (1988).Google Scholar
  32. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108–119.Google Scholar
  33. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., & Greenberg, J. (Eds.),Justice in Social Relations, 145–162, New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  34. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, 141–183. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  35. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions.Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.Google Scholar
  36. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkan, L. (1979). Effects of “voice” and peer opinions on responses to inequity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253–2261.Google Scholar
  37. Gaertner, K. (1989). Winning and losing: Understanding managers reactions to strategic change.Human Relations, 42, 527–546.Google Scholar
  38. Geyelin, M. (1989). Fired managers winning more lawsuits.Wallstreet Journal, September 7, B1.Google Scholar
  39. Gordon, M. E., & Lee, B. A. (1990). Property rights in jobs: Work force, behavioral, and legal perspectives. In Ferris, G. R., & Rowland, K. M. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 8, 303–348. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gould, W. B., IV (1987). Stemming the wrongful discharge tide: A case for arbitration.Employee Relations Law Journal, 13, Winter, 404–425.Google Scholar
  41. Graziano, W. G. (1987). Lost in thought at the choice point: Cognition, context, and equity. In Masters, J. C., & Smith, W. P. (Eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Perspectives 265–295. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Greenberg, J. (1987). Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisal.Social Justice Research, 1, 219–234.Google Scholar
  43. Greenberg, J. (1990a). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, 111–157. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  44. Greenberg, J. (1990b). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.Journal of Management, 16, 399–432.Google Scholar
  45. Greenberg, J. (1991). Managing fair impressions of performance appraisal.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 4, 22–35.Google Scholar
  46. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus, P. B. (Ed.),Basic Group Processes, 235–256. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Hamilton, V. L. (1980). Intuitive psychologist or intuitive lawyer: Alternative models of the attribution process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 767–772.Google Scholar
  48. Hawkins, M. W. (1988). Employment at will: A survey.Labor Law Journal, August, 525–527.Google Scholar
  49. Hill, M., & Sinicropi, A. V. (1986).Management Rights: A Legal and Arbitral Analysis. Washington, DC: BNA.Google Scholar
  50. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In Lerner, M., & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change, 125–143. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  51. Holly, J. F. (1957). Considerations in discharge cases.Monthly Labor Review 80, June, 684–688.Google Scholar
  52. Homans, G. C. (1961).Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  53. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice.American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.Google Scholar
  54. Jennings, J., & Wolters, R. (1976). Discharge cases reconsidered.Arbitration Journal, 31, 164–180.Google Scholar
  55. Klaas, B. S. (1989). Determinants of grievance activity and the grievance system's impact on employee behavior: An integrative perspective.Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 445–458.Google Scholar
  56. Kuhn, J. (1961):Bargaining in Grievance Settlement. New York Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social relations: Introduction.Journal of Social Issues 31, 1–19.Google Scholar
  58. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms.Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52.Google Scholar
  59. Lerner, M. J., & Lerner, S. C., Eds. (1981).The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  60. Leung, K., & Li, W. (1990). Psychological mechanisms of process-control effects.Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 613–620.Google Scholar
  61. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In Thibaut, J. W., Spence, J. T., & Carson, R. (Eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology, 211–239. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  62. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K., Greenberg, M., & Willis, R. (Eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, 27–55. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  63. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula, G. (Ed.)Justice and Social Interaction, 167–218. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  64. Lewin, D. (1987). Dispute resolution in the nonunion firm: A theoretical and empirical analysis.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 465–502.Google Scholar
  65. Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 643–653.Google Scholar
  66. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988).The Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lorber, L., Kirk, J., Kirschner, K., & Handorf, C. (1984).Fear of Firing—A Legal Analysis of Employment at Will. Alexandria, VA: ASPA Foundation.Google Scholar
  68. Malinowski, A. A. (1981). An empirical analysis of discharge cases and the work history of employees reinstated by labor arbitrators. Arbitration Journal, 36(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
  69. McCabe, D. M. (1988).Corporate Nonunion Complaint Procedures: A Strategic Human Resources Management Analysis. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  70. McDermott, J., & Newhams, J. (1971). Discharge-reinstatement: What happens thereafter.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 24, 526–540.Google Scholar
  71. Mobley, W. H. (1982)Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  72. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982).Employee-Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Tumover. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  73. Peach, D. A., & Livernash, E. R. (1974).Grievance Initiation and Resolution: A Study in Basic Steel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Peck, C. (1979). Unjust discharge from employment: A necessary change in the law.Ohio State Law Journal, 40, 1–49.Google Scholar
  75. Peterson, R. B., & Lewin, D. (1990). The nonunion grievance procedure: A viable system of due process?Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 3, 1–18.Google Scholar
  76. Putnam, L. L. (1983). The interpretivist perspective: An alternative to functionalism. In Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.),Communication and Organizations, An Interpretive Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  77. Reis, H. T. (1987). The nature of the justice motive: Some thoughts on operation, internalization, and justification. In Masters, J. C., & Smith, W. P. (Eds.),Social Comparison, Social Justice, and Relative Deprivation: Theoretical Empirical, and Policy Perspectives 131–150. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Reuter, V. G. (1977). Suggestion systems: Utilization, evaluation, and implementation.California Management Review, 19, 78–89.Google Scholar
  79. Rodgers, R. C., Helburn, I. B., & Hunter, J. E. (1983).Cumulating Results Across Studies: Is Seniority Related to Performance? Working paper 83/84-4-6, Graduate School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, TX, October.Google Scholar
  80. Ross, A. (1975). The arbitration of discharge cases: What happens after reinstatement. In McKelvey, J. T. (Ed.),Critical Issues in Arbitration—Proceedings of the National Academy of Arbitrators, 21–60 Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  81. Rousseau, D. (1989). The impact of psychological and implied contracts on behavior in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.Google Scholar
  82. Shepard, I. M., Heylman, P., & Duston, R. L. (1989).Without Just Cause: An Employer's Practical and Legal Guide to Wrongful Discharge Washington DC: BNA.Google Scholar
  83. Shepard, I., & Moran, N. (1982) Wrongful discharge litigation.ILR Report, 10(1), 26–29.Google Scholar
  84. Sheppard, B. (1984). Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6 141–190. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  85. Simkin, W. E. (1986). Some results of reinstatement by arbitration.Arbitration Journal, 41, 53–58.Google Scholar
  86. Sommer, R., & Sommer, B. B. (1980).A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research Tools and Techniques. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  87. South Carolina Code sec 41-17-10 (1976).Google Scholar
  88. South Carolina Department of Labor (1986).Fifty-first Annual Report. Columbia, SC: Department of Labor and State Budget and Control Board.Google Scholar
  89. Stephens, E. C., & Chaney, W. (1974). A study of the reinstatement remedy under the National Labor Relations Act.Labor Law Journal, 25, 31–41.Google Scholar
  90. Stieber, J., & Blackburn, J. (1983).Protecting Unorganized Employees against Unjust Discharge. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State School of Labor and Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  91. Stieber, J., & Murray, M. (1983). Protection against unjust discharge: The need for a federal statute.University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 16(2), 319–341.Google Scholar
  92. Summers, C. W. (1976). Individual protection against unjust dismissal: Time for a statute.Virginia Law Review 62, 481–533.Google Scholar
  93. Summers, C. W. (1980). Protecting all employees against unjust dismissal.Harvard Business Review, January–February, 123–139.Google Scholar
  94. Teele, J. W. (1962). The thought processes of the arbitrator.Arbitration Journal, 17, 87–98.Google Scholar
  95. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975)Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  96. Tyler, T. R. (1984). The role of perceived injustice in defendant's evaluations of their courtroom experience.Law and Society Review, 18, 51–74.Google Scholar
  97. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?Law and Society Review, 22, 301–335.Google Scholar
  98. Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carroll, J. (Ed.),Advances in Applied Social Psychology: Business Settings, 77–98. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  99. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 72–81.Google Scholar
  100. Uniform employment termination act. (1991).Individual Employee Rights Manual, 540, 21–39. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  101. Utne, M. K., & Kidd, R. F. (1980). Equity and attribution. In Mikula, G. (Ed.),Justice and Social Interaction, 63–93. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  102. Vidmar, N. (1981). Justice motives and other psychological factors in the development and resolution of disputes. In Lerner, M. J., & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, 395–423. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  103. Walizer, M. H., & Weiner, P. L. (1978).Research Methods and Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  104. Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice.Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 21–44.Google Scholar
  105. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.Google Scholar
  106. Westin, A. F., & Feliu, A. G. (1988).Resolving Employment Disputes Without Litigation. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  107. Wrongful discharge from employment act. (1991).Individual Employee Rights Manual, 567, 5–7. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  108. Yenny, S. L. (1977). In defense of the grievance procedure in the non-union setting.Employee Relations Law Journal, 2(4), 434–443.Google Scholar
  109. Youngblood, S. A., & Bierman, L. (1985). Due process and employment-at-will: A legal and behavioral analysis. In Rowland, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.),Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  110. Youngblood, S. A. & Tidwell, G. L. (1981). Termination at will: Some changes in the wind.Personnel, May–June, 22–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart A. Youngblood
    • 1
  • Linda Klebe Trevino
    • 2
  • Monica Favia
    • 2
  1. 1.M. J. Neeley School of BusinessTexas Christian UniversityFort Worth
  2. 2.Department of Management and Organization, Smeal College of Business AdministrationThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations