Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 187–206 | Cite as

Drama theory and its relation to game theory. Part 1: Dramatic resolution vs. Rational solution

  • Nigel Howard
Article

Abstract

Drama theory differs from game theory in that it does not regard actors' preferences and perceived opportunities as fixed, but as capable of being changed by the actors themselves under the pressure of pre-play negotiations. Thus characters in a drama undergo change and development. A manyperson, multiphase theory of dramatic transformation is presented, showing how thecore of a drama (in the sense of game theory) is transformed by the interaction between the characters into a strict, strong equilibrium to which they all aspire. The process of dramatic transformation is shown to be driven by actors' reactions to various “paradoxes of rationality”; it is proved that when all these paradoxes have been overcome, a full dramatic resolution has been reached, satisfying actors' emotional and moral demands, as well as the demands of rationality.

Key words

drama theory game theory preference change emotion soft games 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J. (1959). “Acceptable Points in General Cooperativen-Person Games.” In A.W. Tucker and R.D. Luce (eds.),Annals of Mathematics Studies No. 4, Princeton, NJ, pp. 287–324.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, P.G. (1980). “Hypergames: Developing a Model of Conflict,”Futures 12, 489–507.Google Scholar
  3. Howard, N. (1978) “Categories of Games,” unpublished.Google Scholar
  4. Howard, N. (1990). “‘Soft’ Game Theory,”Information and Decision Technologies 16, 215–227.Google Scholar
  5. Howard, N. et al. (1992). “Manifesto for a Theory of Drama and Irrational Choice,”Journal of the Operational Research Society.Google Scholar
  6. Howard, N. (1992). “A Paradigm Shift,”Cooperation and Conflict 6(1), 1–2 (formerly theCONAN Newsletter, published by Nigel Howard Systems, 10 Bloomfield Rd., Birmingham, B13 9 BY, UK).Google Scholar
  7. Howard, N. (1971).Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Nash, J.F. (1953). “Two-Person Cooperative Games,”Econometrica 21, 128–140.Google Scholar
  9. Pirandello, L. (1924).Six Characters in Search of an Author. Translated by E. Storer in Eric Bentley (ed.),Naked Masks, Five Plays by Luigi Pirandello (1952). New York.Google Scholar
  10. von Neumann, J. (1939). “On the Theory of Games of Strategy.” Translated and reprinted in A. W. Tucker and R.D. Luce (eds.),Annals of Mathematics Studies No. 4, Princeton, NJ (1959), pp. 13–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel Howard
    • 1
  1. 1.Nigel Howard SystemsBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations