Pediatric Radiology

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 701–705 | Cite as

Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension

I. Experimental study
  • K. Helmke
  • H. C. Hansen


The optic nerve, ontogenetically part of the central nervous system, is surrounded by subarachnoidal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and dura mater. Because of the connection with the intracranial subarachnoidal space, CSF pressure variations influence the optic nerve sheath (ONS) diameter. Histologic studies revealed a segment of the optic nerve in which maximal diameter fluctuations could be expected, namely the bulging dura mater region approximately 3 mm behind the papilla. Twenty preparations of optic nerves obtained post mortem were examined sonographically before and after dilatation of the ONS, by means of measurement from three different projections. After gelatine-induced widening of the subarachnoidal space, the mean diameter increased by 60 % at 3 mm behind the optic nerve head, but only by 35 % at 10 mm distance. Independent measurements by two examiners correlated highly, which indicates excellent reproducibility of the sonographic measurements. The optimal experimental scanning position was at a right angle to the optic nerve (longitudinal section). Under clinical conditions, however, only axial sections can be obtained using anterior probe positions with transbulbar sound directions. Using such axial projections the 3 nm7 position proved reliably reproducible. The reduced resolution of the optic nerve itself, allowing it to be distinguished from its surrounding sheath, proved to be somewhat disadvantageous from this projection angle.


Optic Nerve Subarachnoidal Space Dura Mater Intracranial Hypertension Optic Nerve Head 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Marshall LF, Bowers-Marshall S, Klauber MR, et al (1991) A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75: 14–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy A, Teasdale E, Matheson M, Galbraith S, Teasdale G (1983) Relationship between CT indices of brain swelling and intracranial pressure after head injury. In: Ishii S, Nagai H, Brock M (eds) Intracranial pressure, vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 562–563Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toutant S, Klauber M, Marshall L, et al (1984) Absent or compressed basal cisterns of first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 61: 691–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Dongen K, Braakmann R, Gelpke GJ (1983) The prognostic value of computed tomography in comatose headinjured patients. J Neurosurg 59: 951–957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghajar JBG (1986) A guide for ventricular catheter placement. Technical note. Neurosurgery 63: 54–59Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Powell MP, Crockhard HA (1985) Behavior of an extradural pressure monitor in clinical use. Comparison of extradural with intraventricular pressure in patients with acute and chronic intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 63: 745–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ostrup RC, Luerssen TG, Marshall LF, Zornow MH (1987) Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure with a miniaturized fiberoptic device. J Neurosurg 67:206–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barlow P, Mendelow AD, Lawrence AE, Barlow M, Rowan JO (1985) Clinical evaluation of two methods of subdural pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 63:578–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    North B, Reilly P (1986) Comparison among three methods of intracranial pressure recording. Neurosurgery 18: 730–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, et al (1986) Intracranial pressure monitors: epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 80: 369–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anders K, Becker GW, Jäger M, Krüger O (1971) Die Abhängigkeit mechanischen Verhaltens menschlicher Faszie von Faserverlauf, Alter und Konservierung. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 69: 246–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anders K, Häring R, Krüger O, Steigerthal I, Pickartz H, Zühlke H (1979) Bis zu welchem Zeitpunkt post mortem ist die Entnahme allogener Venen für den Gefässersatz vertretbar? Vasa 8: 122–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Byrne SF (1978) The echographic measurement and differential diagnosis of optic nerve lesions. In: Ossoinig KC (ed) Ophthalmic echography. (Doc Ophthalmol Proc series, vol 48) Nijhoff/Junk, Dordrecht, pp 571–585Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coleman DJ, Carolli FD (1972) Evaluation of optic neuropathy with B-scan ultrasonography. Am J Ophthalmol 74: 915–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ossoinig KC, Cennamo G, Byrne SF (1981) Echographic differential diagnosis of optic-nerve lesions. In: Thijssen JM, Verbeek AM (eds) Ultrasonography in ophthalmology. (Doc Ophthalmol Proc series, vol 29) Junk, The Hague, pp 327–332Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Skalka HW (1981) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve. Neuroophthalmology 4: 261–272Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schröder W, Guthoff R (1981) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve. In: Thijssen JM, Verbeek AM (eds) Ultrasonography in ophthalmology. (Doc Ophthalmol Proc series, vol 29) Junk, The Hague, pp 359–362Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ossoinig KC (1993) Standardized echography of the optic nerve. In: Till P (ed) Ophthalmic echography, vol 13. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, pp 3–99Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guthoff R, Triebel G, Schröder W, Onken C, Abramo F (1990) Evaluation of the subarachnoidal space — comparisons between ultrasound and high resolution NMR-techniques. In: Sampolesi R (ed) Ultrasonography in ophthalmology, vol 12. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 55–62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Helmke
    • 1
  • H. C. Hansen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric RadiologyUniversity Hospital Eppendorf University of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital EppendorfHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations